I am talking about the difference between meaning(analogy) and knowledge(cause) and the tendency of idiots claim wisdom from analogy.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-31 08:51:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715461615450255360
Category: Epistemology and Method
-
“If you think of it this way then…”, or you say something like “x is y”. Then
“If you think of it this way then…”, or you say something like “x is y”. Then stop. That’s a way to communicate with others. That’s all.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-31 08:50:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715461187891290112
-
The name of a thing, consists of the causes of its existence, not your sparse me
The name of a thing, consists of the causes of its existence, not your sparse memories.If you find an analogy that’s irrelevant. Find Cause.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-31 08:48:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715460720851288064
-
Demonstrating free-association (analogies by which you obtain meaning) is nothin
Demonstrating free-association (analogies by which you obtain meaning) is nothing more than demonstrating your ignorance, and justifying it.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-31 08:45:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715460008683679744
-
True. However critics call it unscientific. It’s an analogy. Its meaningful. It
True. However critics call it unscientific. It’s an analogy. Its meaningful. It isn’t causal. Ergo it’s meaningful not true.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-31 06:38:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715428127720284160
Reply addressees: @BobDude15
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715427096164569088
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715427096164569088
-
The name of a thing, consists of the causes of its existence, not your sparse me
The name of a thing, consists of the causes of its existence, not your sparse memories.If you find an analogy that’s irrelevant. Find Cause.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-31 04:48:00 UTC
-
Demonstrating free-association (analogies by which you obtain meaning) is nothin
Demonstrating free-association (analogies by which you obtain meaning) is nothing more than demonstrating your ignorance, and justifying it.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-31 04:45:00 UTC
-
Please don’t try to be cunning. The purpose of my work is to make self-deception
Please don’t try to be cunning. The purpose of my work is to make self-deception and other-deception impossible. You aren’t smart enough.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-30 16:54:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715220641268506624
-
I am trying to speak in unloaded language and economics and finance disallow dec
I am trying to speak in unloaded language and economics and finance disallow deceit and self deception. Justification = lie.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-30 16:52:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715220185117011968
Reply addressees: @soapjackal
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715219169986355200
IN REPLY TO:
@soapjackal
@curtdoolittle tbf youre just trying to apply propertarian market metaphors.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715219169986355200
-
If you want to find an excuse in religion or philosophy you will find it if you
If you want to find an excuse in religion or philosophy you will find it if you look hard enough. Most philosophers looked hard enough.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-30 15:11:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715194841911701504