Category: Epistemology and Method

  • Why is it that we use the term free speech rather than truthful speech? To keep

    Why is it that we use the term free speech rather than truthful speech? To keep the mainstream media in business.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-15 19:34:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731930874686640128

    Reply addressees: @realDonaldTrump @nytimes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731924988060651520


    IN REPLY TO:

    @realDonaldTrump

    Why did the failing @nytimes refuse to use any of the names given to them that I was so proud to have helped with their careers. DISHONEST!

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731924988060651520

  • THINKING OUT LOUD. WHERE DOES “INFORMATION” GO? Is information a commons? Or is

    THINKING OUT LOUD. WHERE DOES “INFORMATION” GO?

    Is information a commons? Or is information a category?

    Is information superior to commons, or are commons superior to information?

    Information can be considered a primary institution just as economics. Economics can be seen as the act of production distribution, trade, and consumption, … or it can be seen as the method of communicating information such that production, distribution, trade and consumption are made possible.

    —TABLE OF CONTENTS–

    (Use Synopsis Method so that reading the TOC explains the work)

    BOOK ONE

    PART I – HISTORY (narrative)

    (Problem Statement)

    (… the argument… )

    PART II – MAN (Science)

    Biology(Genetics)

    Mind (capabilities, limits and biases)

    Psychology (incentives)

    Sociology (cooperation / ethics)

    Economics (production)

    —> Information Here?

    Commons (investment)

    ——–>Or Information Here?

    Politics (organization)

    Evolution(strategy against competitors)

    Aesthetics (inspiration/beauty)

    PART III – PHILOSOPHY (reason)

    Purpose (general rules of decidability)

    Metaphysics (existence/action)

    Epistemology (science/criticism as universal method)

    Testimony (due diligence and warranty)

    Ethics (non imposition)

    —> Information here?

    ………………informational commons, religion, education, etc.

    —> Or Commons here?

    ………………Information here? as sub?

    Politics (decision on commons)

    Evolution (Group Strategy against competitors)

    Aesthetics (inspiration/beauty)

    PART IIII – LAW (the logic of law)

    PART V – INSTITUTIONS (perpetuation)

    BOOK TWO

    PART VI – MASTERY (argument)

    PART VII – EXECUTION (revolution)

    PART VIII – EXPANSION (transcendence)

    BOOK THREE

    PART IX – LITERATURE AND ART (inspiration)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-15 09:18:00 UTC

  • So how do you measure that they don’t deliver intended results?

    So how do you measure that they don’t deliver intended results?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-14 13:58:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731483885163446273

    Reply addressees: @GaltsGirl @GrossmanJoshua @pye @RightOnCrime

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731483415019577350


    IN REPLY TO:

    @GaltsGirl

    @curtdoolittle All costs are meaningful. Especially, when they don’t deliver stated and intended results. @GrossmanJoshua @pye @RightOnCrime

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/731483415019577350

  • THE SCOPE OF CRITICAL EPISTEMOLOGY (testimonialism, propertarianism, nomocracy,

    THE SCOPE OF CRITICAL EPISTEMOLOGY

    (testimonialism, propertarianism, nomocracy, and aristocratic egalitarianism, in a nutshell)

    Truth:

    We can never know we speak the truth, only if we speak truthfully, and then only by performing due diligence against error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, and deceit.

    Epistemology:

    We can freely associate and develop an hypothesis. The method by which we arrive at the hypothesis does not influence the truth of our guess. Those hypotheses that survive our due diligence against error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, and deceit, may be warrantied to one another as theories. Those theories that survive criticism against error, bias, wishful thinking and deceit, are truth candidates. Those that survive enduringly we call ‘laws’. All knowledge follows this evolution: Free association, hypothesis, theory, law.

    Ethics:

    We cannot know what is a good action, only what is a bad action. A bad action is one that imposes costs. The only way not to impose costs is to limit one’s actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer free of the external imposition of costs upon others.

    Law:

    Create negative law empirically by the resolution of disputes, and incrementally evolve the suppression of parasitism, leaving only new innovations in parasitism, and the remaining positive actions available.

    Liberty:

    Suppress corruption and involuntary transfer and only liberty remains.

    Rule:

    We cannot know good rule except in distant retrospect, we can only know bad rule. The best rule then is that no man rule, and we rule by law. Law does not ask us to be good. It demands only that we are not bad.

    Politics:

    We cannot know what is good, only what we are willing to pay for. The majority cannot know what is good, only what is bad. Ego: Transform democratic majority assent into legal (suit) minority dissent in producing commons. Anything that is both willingly paid for and survives the test of badness or falseness, is the only possible good.

    Religion:

    We cannot know what religions are good, only those that are bad. Those that are bad are not compatible with natural and physical law. Those that are compatible are the only religions that remain.

    Universal:

    The only way to know what to do unto one’s neighbor is to not do that which you would not want done unto you.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-14 10:12:00 UTC

  • A SHORT COURSE IN TESTIMONIAL TRUTH

    A SHORT COURSE IN TESTIMONIAL TRUTH

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/06/28/a-short-course-on-propertarianisms-testimonial-truth/


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-12 13:09:00 UTC

  • THE CURE FOR PROPAGANDA: TRUTH AND INFORMATIONAL COMMONS

    THE CURE FOR PROPAGANDA: TRUTH AND INFORMATIONAL COMMONS

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/01/18/the-cure-for-propaganda-and-western-civilization/


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-12 13:07:00 UTC

  • Recipes are true. (operations). But is meaning ever true? Is meaning but a name

    Recipes are true. (operations). But is meaning ever true? Is meaning but a name for a recipe?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-12 04:56:00 UTC

  • TRUTH When we testify to one another we are seeking to produce a ‘not-false’ tes

    TRUTH

    When we testify to one another we are seeking to produce a ‘not-false’ testimony, not a ‘true’ or ‘complete’ testimony.

    The costs of producing that testimony, and the costs of interpreting that testimony must be offset by the value of the information received by the testimony, and the cooperation, or options on cooperation, or optional discounts on future testimony, that one anticipates obtaining in exchange for performing the testimony.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-11 05:08:00 UTC

  • Identity: The Categorical Instrument Logic: The Set Instrument Mathematics: The

    Identity: The Categorical Instrument

    Logic: The Set Instrument

    Mathematics: The Relational Instrument

    Physics: The Causal Instrument

    Operationalism: The Existential Instrument

    Economics: The Cooperative Instrument

    Reason: The Rational (Linguistic) Instrument

    Social Instrumentalism: Debate, Criticism, Testing.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-08 14:10:00 UTC

  • Unfortunately, being well educated is synonymous with being thoroughly indoctrin

    Unfortunately, being well educated is synonymous with being thoroughly indoctrinated.

    Being well read in science, economics, and history can avoid that problem.

    The enlightenment was a failure because it merely tried to justify a change in power, and as such was incomplete. There was nothing wrong with the Anglo model other than our failure to understand it.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-06 04:53:00 UTC