Category: Epistemology and Method

  • I work in testimonial (scientific) truth. Since every ideological group lies lik

    I work in testimonial (scientific) truth. Since every ideological group lies like hell, it’s no wonder they all damn me. ๐Ÿ™‚


    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-28 05:10:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/747658299173126146

    Reply addressees: @enlightdark

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/747650625488494594


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable โ€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/747650625488494594

  • Crossing my fingers that we will soon depart the STATISTICALLY CORRELATIVE era o

    Crossing my fingers that we will soon depart the STATISTICALLY CORRELATIVE era of policy, and enter the OPERATIONALLY EXISTENTIAL era of policy.

    Will science defeat the era of pseudoscience?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-28 01:51:00 UTC

  • I work in (Testimonial) Truth. Since every ideological group lies like hell, it’

    I work in (Testimonial) Truth. Since every ideological group lies like hell, it’s no wonder they all damn me. But why do they fear truth? ๐Ÿ™‚


    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-28 01:12:00 UTC

  • Just as falsification tells us what may be true by that which we cannot make fal

    Just as falsification tells us what may be true by that which we cannot make false; and proofs tell us what is not false but not what is true; and the law tells us now what we must do, but only what we must not do; and evolution tells us only what fails, not what succeeds, it is not important that the best people lead, as much as it is important that the worst do not. For this reason we must limit access to power to those least likely to lead poorly. How do we know? Demonstrated character in familial, entrepreneurial, political, and military excellence over multiple generations. And the elimination of consideration of those who fail the test of character in familial, entrepreneurial, and military excellence across multiple generations.

    Nobility is most frequently demonstrated by intergenerational excellence. For those who cannot master their passions enough for good breeding, good rearing, good production, and good defense, have demonstrated by their actions that they and their families are unsuitable for leadership.

    Note that survival from the opinions of others in schooling, academy, politics and church, tell us nothing about an individual other than his ability remember and to obey, while engaging in various forms of politicking and deceit. Only family, commercial, and military experience tell us about the capacity of an individual to lead.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-26 13:39:00 UTC

  • Why Not Spread Truth Telling?

    June 25 ยท
    Religion spread with farming and literacy. Law with money and trade. Rationalism with print and industry. Pseudoscience with academy and fiat money. Propaganda with media and student loans So why not spread Truth-telling and science with education?
  • Why Not Spread Truth Telling?

    June 25 ยท
    Religion spread with farming and literacy. Law with money and trade. Rationalism with print and industry. Pseudoscience with academy and fiat money. Propaganda with media and student loans So why not spread Truth-telling and science with education?
  • Religion spread with farming and literacy. Law with money and trade. Rationalism

    Religion spread with farming and literacy.

    Law with money and trade.

    Rationalism with print and industry.

    Pseudoscience with academy and fiat money.

    Propaganda with media and student loans

    So why not spread Truth-telling and science with education?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-25 12:53:00 UTC

  • Philosophical Crimes:

    0 – Ignorance 1 – Error 2 – Bias 3 – Wishful Thinking 4 – Suggestion, Loading and Framing 5 – Obscurantism, Pseudorationalism, Pseudoscience 6 – Overloading, Saturation, and Propaganda 7 – Deceit

  • Philosophical Crimes:

    0 – Ignorance 1 – Error 2 – Bias 3 – Wishful Thinking 4 – Suggestion, Loading and Framing 5 – Obscurantism, Pseudorationalism, Pseudoscience 6 – Overloading, Saturation, and Propaganda 7 – Deceit

  • The Difference Between Personal-Preferential and Political-Decidable Philosophies

    We can make use of whatever free associations our unobservable minds give us. That says nothing about the truth of anything. it says only about the utility of randomly generated meaningful ideas. So personal philosophy(religion) can be constructed of such nonsense. Because people need to act in a way that they can feel confident in acting or they would be unable to act. But philosophy as a science: in which we seek decidability between different ideas, and to limit the damage of others ideas is something quite different.

    This is what separates personal ‘philosophy’ which is not philosophy per se, but philosophy by analogy…. and political philosophy by which we create ethics, morals, norms, laws, institutions, commons, and war. This is the difference between what you call philosophy and has nothing to do with truth (decidability) and the science of decidability that is provided by attempts at using truth to decide between one thing and another – especially in matters of conflict. So as I say: it doesn’t matter how you come up with ideas. Just don’t call it true, don’t call it philosophy, and don’t call it science. It is what it is: justification for working with personal intuition sot hat you need not depend on others for guidance.