I love in old english that we used “right” and “unright”, just like we used “clean” and “unclean”.
Now we use right and wrong, clean and dirty.
Why?
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-03 09:30:00 UTC
I love in old english that we used “right” and “unright”, just like we used “clean” and “unclean”.
Now we use right and wrong, clean and dirty.
Why?
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-03 09:30:00 UTC
—“Carnap: In the 1930s he developed a pragmatic theory in which many traditional philosophical disputes are viewed as the expression of different linguistic frameworks, not genuine disagreements. This distinction between a language (framework) and what can be said within it was central to Carnapβs philosophy, reconciling the apparently a priori domains such as logic and mathematics with a thoroughgoing empiricism: basic logical and mathematical commitments partially constitute the choice of language. There is no uniquely correct choice among alternative logics or foundations for mathematics; it is a question of practical expedience, not truth. “—
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-03 05:26:00 UTC
EPISTEMOLOGY OF FIGHTING
—“Russians only understand things properly after a good fight”— Dmitry Chernov (Priceless)
The epistemology of fighting has high empirical content and can be trusted. Contrast with the anglo epistemology of commerce. Maybe that is a great way of communicating the difference between our cultures given our vastly different levels of trust.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-03 02:37:00 UTC
Propertarian argument is sort of what Mises dreamed praxeology to be. With practice it makes you *look* smart. π
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-01 14:25:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/748885221693468672
Reply addressees: @JohnRebel14 @Lead_Farmer7
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/748877923457896448
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable β we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/748877923457896448
We do not judge religions by what they claim, but by differences. Same with science. Same with epistemology. Name != Cause.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-01 07:09:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/748775618372706304
Reply addressees: @LibertarianMike
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/748754129485377536
IN REPLY TO:
@LibertarianMike
The United States is in no way founded upon the Christian religion — George Washington & John Adams, in a diplomatic message to Malta.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/748754129485377536
This is why I work so hard on Testimonial Truth. It’s a counter to counter the French, German, and Jewish enlightenments.
Source date (UTC): 2016-06-28 19:51:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/747880093033369600
Reply addressees: @FriedrichHayek
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/747862214107791360
IN REPLY TO:
@FriedrichHayek
@curtdoolittle what is the “Ashenkazi” role?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/747862214107791360
we all need approximate narratives for consistent decision making when we encounter the many gaps in our knowledge.
Source date (UTC): 2016-06-28 11:38:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/747756053832540160
Reply addressees: @ne0colonial
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/747730932094767104
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable β we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/747730932094767104
When making truth claims we must ensure we arent arguing by analogy but name. Otherwise, we lie to ourselves w/false deduction.
Source date (UTC): 2016-06-28 06:33:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/747679276401573893
Reply addressees: @ne0colonial
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/747672860584476672
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable β we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/747672860584476672
This is a very smart observation. I think truth must consist of words. Strategy as their external consequence… So lies work.
Source date (UTC): 2016-06-28 05:56:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/747670069266759680
Reply addressees: @ne0colonial
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/747660781131554816
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable β we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/747660781131554816
I work in (Testimonial) Truth. Since every ideological group lies like hell, it’s no wonder they all damn me. But why do they fear truth? π
Source date (UTC): 2016-06-28 05:11:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/747658775096590337