Curt Doolittle

Category: Epistemology and Method

  • PHILOSOPHY IS RELEGATED TO PREFERENCE? So, as I just defined science that means:

    PHILOSOPHY IS RELEGATED TO PREFERENCE?

    So, as I just defined science that means:

    Philosophy consists of developing methods of decidability in matters of preference, the good, and the true.

    I question whether at this point, it is only relegated to that of the preferential and the good, since as I have defined science, science is now the discipline of truthful speech, and philosophy merely the choice of preferences (self) or good (group).

    Ergo, in SCIENCE we use logical (subjectively testable) and instrumental (reducing the imperceptible to the subjectively testable), in order to produce decidability on the truth or falsehood of propositions independent of human scale.

    Philosophy then is limited to the selection of preferences, and as far as I can tell, that correctly categorizes philosophy as it is practiced.

    And philosophy is then a subset of science: philosophy is the science of preference and choice – otherwise it is the discipline of deception. Because All else is not real, but experiential, ideal, theological, or a conflation of two or more of the above.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-17 10:37:00 UTC

  • MATHEMATICS: The science of measurement using identity(referent), one-to-one cor

    MATHEMATICS:

    The science of measurement using identity(referent), one-to-one correspondence (balance), positional naming(scale), ratios(relations), in each of the existential dimensions of reality: point(identity), line(distance), area (geometry), volume(algebra), change(time), relative change (calculus), and beyond existential reality in purely logical relations(algebraic geometry).

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-17 09:59:00 UTC

  • REMOVING MATHEMATICS FROM PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY AND RETURNING IT TO THE SCIENC

    REMOVING MATHEMATICS FROM PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY AND RETURNING IT TO THE SCIENCE OF MEASUREMENT.

    In mathematics, construction must be operationally possible (computable), even if the descriptions (proofs) are only deducible.

    Others only provide an IDEAL (logical) justification of why cantor is wrong, and not a REAL (scientific and operational) explanation of why he was wrong: that the technique (like gears) demonstrated something valuable: that the rate of production of positional names produces different sized sets regardless of the point of termination (scale or limit). Cantor is one step removed from theology(ideal by design), and speaking in philosophy (ideals), instead of speaking in mathematics (measurement) and science (operations).

    The depth of this statement allows us to repair mathematics and return it to a science of measurement, rather than this nonsensical platonism used today – a remnant of the ancient greeks.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-17 08:06:00 UTC

  • IS ENOUGH A short course in Testimonial Truth

    https://propertarianism.com/2015/06/28/a-short-course-on-propertarianisms-testimonial-truth/TRUTH IS ENOUGH

    A short course in Testimonial Truth.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-16 07:24:00 UTC

  • I DON’T CARE ABOUT YOUR RACE, NATIONALITY, OR GENDER I don’t care about anything

    I DON’T CARE ABOUT YOUR RACE, NATIONALITY, OR GENDER

    I don’t care about anything other than the content and form of your arguments. I don’t care about nationality or race, or gender. All I care about is building an international group of people who can teach and use natural law in opposition to the abrahamic, marxist, frankfurt, and postmodern schools. Aristocracy For Everyone. Let a thousand Nations Bloom. No people can fail transcendence if they choose it.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 14:46:00 UTC

  • NEWBIES: ITS ALL ABOUT A SINGLE QUESTION: TRUTH —“Why do people follow this bl

    NEWBIES: ITS ALL ABOUT A SINGLE QUESTION: TRUTH

    —“Why do people follow this bloke?”–Declan Keating

    —“Because he uses lots of words”— Philip Maher

    ‘Cause I say smart things, for smart people, in language for smart people, and openly ridicule not-smart people, for not understanding smart things written in language for smart people. And believe it or not, there are smart people around the world. Conversely, only a simple pleb speaks in the simple language of simple plebs. So I don’t speak in the simple language of plebs, because I am not a simple pleb – and doing so would be pandering to simple plebs.

    Seriously though: *I am playing an internet game: How do you do serious philosophy and political theory using the internet as your classroom?* And I am asking one very big question: “Is it possible to legislate the demand for warranty of due diligence for public political and commercial speech just as we demand it for products and services – thereby freeing us from living in a world of lies?” Well, it turns out that there are people who want to do serious philosophy and political theory who can’t or dont want or won’t spend the money to do so full time in universities. And that they are interested in the answer to that question. The price of working as I do, is switching from philosopher, to professor, to troll (animal) controller.

    And it’s hard to separate the decent ordinary folk from the dick-weeds who waste my time and effort. So I have learned to Troll-fight with the best. 😉

    cheers. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 04:47:00 UTC

  • (from elsewhere) I do my job. I do it with rigorous discipline and consistency.

    (from elsewhere)

    I do my job. I do it with rigorous discipline and consistency. Even if I think I intuit the outcome, i ignore my intuition and continue my investigation through aggressive falsification. When the investigation is exhausted, and I can find nothing left to falsify I construct a solution out of what remains. Christianity must die, but jesus-ness is a good thing – as long as it is limited to *personal actions on those within the polity*.

    If you can find many other thinkers with this degree of commitment to falsification of everything they believe, I’d like to meet them. Because as far as I know, we happy few are painfully rare.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 17:46:00 UTC

  • THE PURPOSE OF MEMES, ARGUMENTS, AND THEORIES —“Memes < arguments < arguments

    THE PURPOSE OF MEMES, ARGUMENTS, AND THEORIES

    —“Memes < arguments < arguments turned into memes”—Benji Buckles

    That’s not quite right. Let me rephrase:

    3) Memes( distribution and advertising to opposition markets)

    2) Arguments (production and marketing to different markets)

    1) Theories (Research and Development regardless of market)

    I do theories and arguments. I don’t do memes.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 12:59:00 UTC

  • MEME FREE ZONE WARNING: No memes in this page. Memes are for people who cant mak

    MEME FREE ZONE

    WARNING: No memes in this page. Memes are for people who cant make arguments and so need memes. I can make arguments, and I made a forum specifically for good arguments. And I keep it ‘clean’ of non-arguments and most bad arguments.

    (Sorry. It’s a class thing. )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 12:21:00 UTC

  • *we value subjectively* *we choose subjectively* That does not mean we cannot de

    *we value subjectively*

    *we choose subjectively*

    That does not mean we cannot decide objectively.

    We do decide objectively, whenever we calculate rather than reason.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 17:18:00 UTC