PHILOSOPHY IS RELEGATED TO PREFERENCE? So, as I just defined science that means:

PHILOSOPHY IS RELEGATED TO PREFERENCE?

So, as I just defined science that means:

Philosophy consists of developing methods of decidability in matters of preference, the good, and the true.

I question whether at this point, it is only relegated to that of the preferential and the good, since as I have defined science, science is now the discipline of truthful speech, and philosophy merely the choice of preferences (self) or good (group).

Ergo, in SCIENCE we use logical (subjectively testable) and instrumental (reducing the imperceptible to the subjectively testable), in order to produce decidability on the truth or falsehood of propositions independent of human scale.

Philosophy then is limited to the selection of preferences, and as far as I can tell, that correctly categorizes philosophy as it is practiced.

And philosophy is then a subset of science: philosophy is the science of preference and choice – otherwise it is the discipline of deception. Because All else is not real, but experiential, ideal, theological, or a conflation of two or more of the above.