Category: Epistemology and Method

  • LACK OF DUE DILIGENCE = LYING Aug 06, 2017 1:51pm by Bill Joslin —“Curt equate

    LACK OF DUE DILIGENCE = LYING

    Aug 06, 2017 1:51pm

    by Bill Joslin

    —“Curt equates a lack of due diligence to vet ones ideas against error, bias, self deception, overloading etc as lying. Any primacy of consciousness or theism stands as arguing for a preference opposed to arguing a point in the commons.

    Theism and primacy of-conciousness are not verifiable in the commons – to proceed with them you must accept these premises.

    ***When we verify via our best empirical methods, our arguments gain credibility from reality. When we assert based on a priorisms which can not be found in reality we use logic to “steal credibility from reality” – we assert it as reality without consulting reality- a transfer of credibility from existence in reality, to the interpretive framework.***

    If an argument holds arbitrary assertions we can dismiss it off-hand. (If asserted without evidence it can be dismissed without evidence)”—


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 10:14:00 UTC

  • Part of the art of saying unpleasant things, is saying unpleasant things that on

    Part of the art of saying unpleasant things, is saying unpleasant things that only peers can understand….


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-25 17:06:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1011294625707982849

    Reply addressees: @wjfrisby

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1011282723460304897


    IN REPLY TO:

    @wjfrisby

    @curtdoolittle Let’s put it this way: if I worked for Twitter, and I wanted to further their (stated and unstated) aims, I would ban you like a shot, coz I actually understand what you are saying. Most of it, anyway 😛

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1011282723460304897

  • The Geometry of Meaning : The Demand for Narrative

    From the series: math/logic > science > philosophy > religion we can construct the series: physical > mental > emotional, and the series: logic > description > fiction, and the series: associable > reasonable > calculable > computable. and we can use them to calculate the series: lack of agency > potential agency > demonstrated agency The weak of will want religion, to defend against others’ wills; The able of will want philosophy, to advocate their will and; The strong of will want science, to put their will to work; And those who are strongest will want Law: Because law is the means by which the strong impose their will. Because we want what our Agency demands.

  • The Geometry of Meaning : The Demand for Narrative

    From the series: math/logic > science > philosophy > religion we can construct the series: physical > mental > emotional, and the series: logic > description > fiction, and the series: associable > reasonable > calculable > computable. and we can use them to calculate the series: lack of agency > potential agency > demonstrated agency The weak of will want religion, to defend against others’ wills; The able of will want philosophy, to advocate their will and; The strong of will want science, to put their will to work; And those who are strongest will want Law: Because law is the means by which the strong impose their will. Because we want what our Agency demands.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE GEOMETRY OF MEANING : THE DEMAND FOR NARR

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE GEOMETRY OF MEANING : THE DEMAND FOR NARRATIVE

    From the series:
    math/logic > science > philosophy > religion

    we can construct the series:
    physical > mental > emotional,

    and the series:
    logic > description > fiction,

    and the series:
    associable > reasonable > calculable > computable.

    and we can use them to calculate the series:
    lack of agency > potential agency > demonstrated agency

    The weak of will want religion, to defend against others’ wills;
    The able of will want philosophy, to advocate their will and;
    The strong of will want science, to put their will to work;
    And those who are strongest will want Law:
    Because law is the means by which the strong impose their will.

    Because we want what our Agency demands.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-23 14:29:40 UTC

  • 1 – EXISTENCE Math (Measurement) Science (Deflation) 2 – COOPERATION Testimony (

    1 – EXISTENCE
    Math (Measurement)
    Science (Deflation)

    2 – COOPERATION
    Testimony (Truth )
    Law (Cooperation )

    3 – CHOICE
    History (Description )
    Philosophy (Choice and Good )

    4 – STRATEGY
    Group Strategy ( Competition )
    Religion ( Indoctrination ) (Myth, Ritual, Oath, Festival)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-23 11:25:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1010483925465038848

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. 1 – EXISTENCE Math (Measurement) Science (Def

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    1 – EXISTENCE
    Math (Measurement)
    Science (Deflation)

    2 – COOPERATION
    Testimony (Truth )
    Law (Cooperation )

    3 – CHOICE
    History (Description )
    Philosophy (Choice and Good )

    4 – STRATEGY
    Group Strategy ( Competition )
    Religion ( Indoctrination ) (Myth, Ritual, Oath, Festival)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-23 11:25:04 UTC

  • THE GEOMETRY OF MEANING : THE DEMAND FOR NARRATIVE From the series: math/logic >

    THE GEOMETRY OF MEANING : THE DEMAND FOR NARRATIVE

    From the series:

    math/logic > science > philosophy > religion

    we can construct the series:

    physical > mental > emotional,

    and the series:

    logic > description > fiction,

    and the series:

    associable > reasonable > calculable > computable.

    and we can use them to calculate the series:

    lack of agency > potential agency > demonstrated agency

    The weak of will want religion, to defend against others’ wills;

    The able of will want philosophy, to advocate their will and;

    The strong of will want science, to put their will to work;

    And those who are strongest will want Law:

    Because law is the means by which the strong impose their will.

    Because we want what our Agency demands.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-23 10:29:00 UTC

  • 1 – EXISTENCE Math (Measurement) Science (Deflation) 2 – COOPERATION Testimony (

    1 – EXISTENCE

    Math (Measurement)

    Science (Deflation)

    2 – COOPERATION

    Testimony (Truth )

    Law (Cooperation )

    3 – CHOICE

    History (Description )

    Philosophy (Choice and Good )

    4 – STRATEGY

    Group Strategy ( Competition )

    Religion ( Indoctrination ) (Myth, Ritual, Oath, Festival)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-23 07:25:00 UTC

  • THE WEAK USE TOOLS OF THE WEAK The problem with mythology, conflation and fictio

    THE WEAK USE TOOLS OF THE WEAK

    The problem with mythology, conflation and fictionalism is that like numerology astrology and scriptural interpretation, you can find any meaning you look for. Just as any opponent can do the same. As such it is just the wittiest liar that wins the tactical argument and the most utilitarian lies that win the war of political control. The only way for the good to win is the truth, and to abandon all convenient sophisms and to prosecute as liars all who do otherwise.

    Weak and false is weak and false no matter how useful weakness and falsehood are.

    THE STRONG USE TRUTH , VIOLENCE, AND RULE


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-22 12:04:00 UTC