Curt Doolittle

Category: Epistemology and Method

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544626378 Timestamp) —“Inferences can’t be measured, property-en-toto (a demonstrated definition – i.e. demonstrated interests) can. so no, couching agency isn’t a meta-frame for cults, nor a result of ignorance of the agency-structure interdependence, but rather a matter of calculating agency by its resulting output. (the key point of confusion is the presumption that property is restricted to tangible stuff [materialism] where as property-en-toto includes the intangibles, things like, relationships, goals, identity – anything we invest our time, effort and care into [demonstrated investment])”— Bill Joslin Perfect. No one will defeat Bill now.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544796934 Timestamp) Within the subject of Face vs Truth, what is the difference between Loyalty and Duty?

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544796934 Timestamp) Within the subject of Face vs Truth, what is the difference between Loyalty and Duty?

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544724200 Timestamp) SECOND BIT OF CLARITY FOR THE DAY: DIMENSIONS OF DUE DILIGENCE Dimensions of Necessary Warranty of Due Diligence:

    • 0 identity
    • 1 internal consistency (logical) (verbal)
    • 2 external correspondence (empirical) (existential)
    • 3 existential possibility (operational) (actionable)
    • 4 rational choice (voluntary and rational) (choice)

    + 5 reciprocity (reciprocally voluntary and rational)(morality)

    + limits, full accounting, and parsimony (complete)

    = Coherence (complete consistency) (a) I sometimes don’t separate out rational choice and reciprocity and simply use Morality for the combination. (b) I sometimes don’t enumerate limits, full accounting, and parsimony, but just use full accounting. (c) I sometimes don’t mention coherence because it only seems to confuse people that it’s the consistency across all of the dimensions (d )All of these are simply tests of consistency within or across (coherence) dimensions that it is possible for man to test. (e) Limits, Full Accounting, Parsimony, are tests of every individual dimension The rest of the tests, only the given dimension.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544724200 Timestamp) SECOND BIT OF CLARITY FOR THE DAY: DIMENSIONS OF DUE DILIGENCE Dimensions of Necessary Warranty of Due Diligence:

    • 0 identity
    • 1 internal consistency (logical) (verbal)
    • 2 external correspondence (empirical) (existential)
    • 3 existential possibility (operational) (actionable)
    • 4 rational choice (voluntary and rational) (choice)

    + 5 reciprocity (reciprocally voluntary and rational)(morality)

    + limits, full accounting, and parsimony (complete)

    = Coherence (complete consistency) (a) I sometimes don’t separate out rational choice and reciprocity and simply use Morality for the combination. (b) I sometimes don’t enumerate limits, full accounting, and parsimony, but just use full accounting. (c) I sometimes don’t mention coherence because it only seems to confuse people that it’s the consistency across all of the dimensions (d )All of these are simply tests of consistency within or across (coherence) dimensions that it is possible for man to test. (e) Limits, Full Accounting, Parsimony, are tests of every individual dimension The rest of the tests, only the given dimension.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544807804 Timestamp) THE GRAMMARS OF THE RED PILL We all get our red pills from different sources. Mine was running businesses, watching the press lie about what my father said in town council, encountering the immorality of the legal system, and the one sidedness and immorality of divorce. I don’t care whether you get it from the manosphere(personal), the alt-light(social), alt-right (political), propertarianism(institutional or intellectual?), nasdap(military) sphere. We all understand the world in the power-language that we are most familiar with, and can best empathize with, and are most motivated by. What matters is that we have an OPERATIONALLY POSSIBLE solution for the survival of our genetic lines, our people, our culture, our civilization, and our ability to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, into the gods we imaged – the universe is ours for the taking. The only thing I focus on is the solution. I’m happy if everyone else focuses on REACH. -hugs

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544807804 Timestamp) THE GRAMMARS OF THE RED PILL We all get our red pills from different sources. Mine was running businesses, watching the press lie about what my father said in town council, encountering the immorality of the legal system, and the one sidedness and immorality of divorce. I don’t care whether you get it from the manosphere(personal), the alt-light(social), alt-right (political), propertarianism(institutional or intellectual?), nasdap(military) sphere. We all understand the world in the power-language that we are most familiar with, and can best empathize with, and are most motivated by. What matters is that we have an OPERATIONALLY POSSIBLE solution for the survival of our genetic lines, our people, our culture, our civilization, and our ability to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, into the gods we imaged – the universe is ours for the taking. The only thing I focus on is the solution. I’m happy if everyone else focuses on REACH. -hugs

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544806260 Timestamp) Transcendence by Truth is the most intolerant religion of all. … The Most Intolerant Wins.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545053983 Timestamp) GRAMMARS IN TESTIMONIALISM I use a definition of grammar that limits semantic content to the grammatical operations available. 0) Universal Grammar: (serial, continuous, recursive, disambiguation) 1) Grammar: Limited to dimensions of reality. 2) Semantics: Vocabulary within the limits of the Grammar So you can look at language the old way: semantics on up. Or you can look at language the new way, grammars on down. So when I use ‘grammar’ it is closer to ‘means of communication, advocacy, persuasion, argument, and rejection’.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545053983 Timestamp) GRAMMARS IN TESTIMONIALISM I use a definition of grammar that limits semantic content to the grammatical operations available. 0) Universal Grammar: (serial, continuous, recursive, disambiguation) 1) Grammar: Limited to dimensions of reality. 2) Semantics: Vocabulary within the limits of the Grammar So you can look at language the old way: semantics on up. Or you can look at language the new way, grammars on down. So when I use ‘grammar’ it is closer to ‘means of communication, advocacy, persuasion, argument, and rejection’.