(FB 1544281590 Timestamp) STYLE GUIDE: ATTRIBUTIONS “by” = Written by “h/t” = Forwarded, Recommended by “via” = Published on site, page, whatever… —“quote”—Author being quoted —myquote—Current Author So: THIS IS THE TITLE by John Doe, via His Web Site, h/t Mary Roe this_is_a_link … … ( FILE UNDER: FORMATTING OF POSTS )
Category: Epistemology and Method
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544392745 Timestamp) —“For me Testimonialism is one of the easier concepts in Propertarianism. Much of what you speak about requires a lot more reading, whereas Testimonialism is easy to get if you work with automation, have experience with programming, have read a bit of philosophy of science, have an IQ above two SDs, and has a touch of aspieness.”— Singular Speech lol 😉
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544392745 Timestamp) —“For me Testimonialism is one of the easier concepts in Propertarianism. Much of what you speak about requires a lot more reading, whereas Testimonialism is easy to get if you work with automation, have experience with programming, have read a bit of philosophy of science, have an IQ above two SDs, and has a touch of aspieness.”— Singular Speech lol 😉
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544710123 Timestamp) A LITTLE INCREASED PRECISION ON MY USE OF ‘AGENCY’ I preserve both real and ideal definitions of truth, and so the source of confusion is my deflation of truth into real and ideal terms (truthfulness, and truth proper/ideal truth) and not doing so with agency (agency in fact, and ideal agency) and assuming the reader understands. Second, part of the reason i use the term is to reverse its emphasis on the blame of others(structure) vs the self (mindfulness). And that is because I include reciprocity which includes markets in everything. Which is perfect ‘structure’. So perfect knowledge, perfect action, within limits of reciprocity (perfect structure) is commensurable with perfect testimony (truth proper/ideal truth). So I don’t have a term for agency as you most it (possible range of production), instead of the limit of production. Whereas with truthful and truth i have a term for both the possible range of production, and the limit of production. Agency —————————————————> Good —————————————————–> Honest->Truthful(real)->True(Ideal)->True(Analytic)->Taut.-> Agency(limit) = Omniscience(knowledge), +Omnicognizance(Reason), +Omnipotence(Action), within +Reciprocity(Condition) |Agency| Knowledge->Reason->Action->Condition. Thanks Bill Joslin for helping me with this oversight.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544652110 Timestamp) —“Curt; What are your views on propaganda?”—Gabriel Y. Truth spoken elegantly and succinctly is the best advertising.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544626422 Timestamp) —“Things like motivation can only be measured in the outcomes they produce. You can claim to be as motivated as you like; but with not fruits, you’d only be demonstrating/ expressing a lie {a claim to motivation you don’t demonstrate}.”–Brandon Hayes
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544626378 Timestamp) —“Inferences can’t be measured, property-en-toto (a demonstrated definition – i.e. demonstrated interests) can. so no, couching agency isn’t a meta-frame for cults, nor a result of ignorance of the agency-structure interdependence, but rather a matter of calculating agency by its resulting output. (the key point of confusion is the presumption that property is restricted to tangible stuff [materialism] where as property-en-toto includes the intangibles, things like, relationships, goals, identity – anything we invest our time, effort and care into [demonstrated investment])”— Bill Joslin Perfect. No one will defeat Bill now.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544710123 Timestamp) A LITTLE INCREASED PRECISION ON MY USE OF ‘AGENCY’ I preserve both real and ideal definitions of truth, and so the source of confusion is my deflation of truth into real and ideal terms (truthfulness, and truth proper/ideal truth) and not doing so with agency (agency in fact, and ideal agency) and assuming the reader understands. Second, part of the reason i use the term is to reverse its emphasis on the blame of others(structure) vs the self (mindfulness). And that is because I include reciprocity which includes markets in everything. Which is perfect ‘structure’. So perfect knowledge, perfect action, within limits of reciprocity (perfect structure) is commensurable with perfect testimony (truth proper/ideal truth). So I don’t have a term for agency as you most it (possible range of production), instead of the limit of production. Whereas with truthful and truth i have a term for both the possible range of production, and the limit of production. Agency —————————————————> Good —————————————————–> Honest->Truthful(real)->True(Ideal)->True(Analytic)->Taut.-> Agency(limit) = Omniscience(knowledge), +Omnicognizance(Reason), +Omnipotence(Action), within +Reciprocity(Condition) |Agency| Knowledge->Reason->Action->Condition. Thanks Bill Joslin for helping me with this oversight.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544652110 Timestamp) —“Curt; What are your views on propaganda?”—Gabriel Y. Truth spoken elegantly and succinctly is the best advertising.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544626422 Timestamp) —“Things like motivation can only be measured in the outcomes they produce. You can claim to be as motivated as you like; but with not fruits, you’d only be demonstrating/ expressing a lie {a claim to motivation you don’t demonstrate}.”–Brandon Hayes