MINOR UPDATE TO THE GRAMMARS Fussing with this problem a long time but have improved the categories of the Fictionalisms by converting to spectrums. … Deceits … … … Fictionalism … … … …. Pseudoscience -> Magic … … … …. Idealism-> Surrealism, and … … … …. Supernaturalism->Occult === LIST (W/O DEFLATIONARY GRAMMARS) === THE SPECTRUM: 1. Sense(stimuli) … … Perception (composition) … … … Association 2. Logic Facility (constant relations) … … Imagination Facility (prediction) … … … Reason Facility (comparison, permutation) 3. Grammar facility (statements) … … Paradigms (‘metaphysics’, ‘dimensions’) … … Vocabulary … … … Sounds … … … Signs (acts, actions) … … … Marks (records) … … … … accidental … … … … intentional … … … … … Mark … … … … … Symbol … … … … … … Glyph … … … … … Pictogram … … … … … Picture … … … … … Picture Series … … … … … Animation 4. Communication Facility (“Language”) … Truths … … Logics (deflationary Grammars) … … Rhetoric (argumentative, persuasive Grammars) … Descriptions … … Testimony … Ordinary Language … Narrations (inflationary Grammars) … … Narrative (description) … … … Storytelling (loading, framing) … Deceits … … … Fictionalism … … … …. Pseudoscience -> Magic… … … …. Idealism-> Surrealism, and… … … …. Supernaturalism->Occult … … … Obscurantism (Obscuring, Overloading) … … … … Propaganda … … … Misdirection (Deceit) … … … Fraud (for gain) … … … Harm (Evil, for harm regardless of gain)
Category: Epistemology and Method
-
Minor Update to The Grammars
MINOR UPDATE TO THE GRAMMARS Fussing with this problem a long time but have improved the categories of the Fictionalisms by converting to spectrums. … Deceits … … … Fictionalism … … … …. Pseudoscience -> Magic … … … …. Idealism-> Surrealism, and … … … …. Supernaturalism->Occult === LIST (W/O DEFLATIONARY GRAMMARS) === THE SPECTRUM: 1. Sense(stimuli) … … Perception (composition) … … … Association 2. Logic Facility (constant relations) … … Imagination Facility (prediction) … … … Reason Facility (comparison, permutation) 3. Grammar facility (statements) … … Paradigms (‘metaphysics’, ‘dimensions’) … … Vocabulary … … … Sounds … … … Signs (acts, actions) … … … Marks (records) … … … … accidental … … … … intentional … … … … … Mark … … … … … Symbol … … … … … … Glyph … … … … … Pictogram … … … … … Picture … … … … … Picture Series … … … … … Animation 4. Communication Facility (“Language”) … Truths … … Logics (deflationary Grammars) … … Rhetoric (argumentative, persuasive Grammars) … Descriptions … … Testimony … Ordinary Language … Narrations (inflationary Grammars) … … Narrative (description) … … … Storytelling (loading, framing) … Deceits … … … Fictionalism … … … …. Pseudoscience -> Magic… … … …. Idealism-> Surrealism, and… … … …. Supernaturalism->Occult … … … Obscurantism (Obscuring, Overloading) … … … … Propaganda … … … Misdirection (Deceit) … … … Fraud (for gain) … … … Harm (Evil, for harm regardless of gain)
-
2) … – with preference for the stoic method (self authoring, virtues of action
2) … – with preference for the stoic method (self authoring, virtues of action), the epicurean objective (within one’s control), testimonial (scientific) knowledge, the play (ritual), and team sport, festival, and feast (celebration). …
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-25 11:34:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176822279759630337
Reply addressees: @AndrewCordeaux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176821532108214273
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@AndrewCordeaux 1) I mean the physical, cognitive and emotional discipline to control the subject of attention on the present intent, insulated from distractions whether personal, environmental, or interpersonal. But …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1176821532108214273
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@AndrewCordeaux 1) I mean the physical, cognitive and emotional discipline to control the subject of attention on the present intent, insulated from distractions whether personal, environmental, or interpersonal. But …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1176821532108214273
-
For information to be stored one needs a means of storing state in order to comp
For information to be stored one needs a means of storing state in order to compare states, to detect differences and predict futures. Where is that information stored, how is it organized, and by what process does it perform prediction permutation, and choice?
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 20:30:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176232371173154816
Reply addressees: @emailmikelowry
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176192218408685568
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176192218408685568
-
4. As such your proposition seeks a permissive definition under which we do not
4. As such your proposition seeks a permissive definition under which we do not scrutinize (practice skepticism). Are his assets earned? Are here breasts real? Are you signaling VIRTUE WITH OTHER PEOPLE’S MONEY. And that’s the question that plagues us. The virtue signal theft.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 16:36:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176173594751184898
Reply addressees: @EPoe187
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176173233659404289
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@EPoe187 3. So the presumption in the literature is that it’s ‘evidence’. If it is just communication, then the central problem is that humans innovate to lie (cheat) more than they innovate to compete (produce).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1176173233659404289
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@EPoe187 3. So the presumption in the literature is that it’s ‘evidence’. If it is just communication, then the central problem is that humans innovate to lie (cheat) more than they innovate to compete (produce).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1176173233659404289
-
Fields, Not Ideals, Truths, Or Favorites
Fields, Not Ideals, Truths, Or Favorites https://propertarianism.com/2019/09/23/fields-not-ideals-truths-or-favorites/
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 15:18:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176153768532090880
-
RT @MartianHoplite: The future may already be written. But it can never be read.
RT @MartianHoplite: The future may already be written. But it can never be read. The first time it is, it’s the present. After that, it’s t…
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 01:03:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175938784518709248
-
This is a problem that arises from disciplinary specialization rather than maste
This is a problem that arises from disciplinary specialization rather than mastery of multiple fields – and is another example of why I teach the Grammars, and use Economics (demonstrated behavior at scale) where others do not. Groups demonstrate different criteria for selection.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 00:49:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175935215824322561
Reply addressees: @User1233213
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175934766559965185
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@User1233213 For example Jayman will disagree group selection but he limits the term to its origins, rather than expanding it to cover increasing means of selection based upon circumstantial demand – the most obvious being masculine traits in stress, and less so in plenty.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175934766559965185
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@User1233213 For example Jayman will disagree group selection but he limits the term to its origins, rather than expanding it to cover increasing means of selection based upon circumstantial demand – the most obvious being masculine traits in stress, and less so in plenty.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175934766559965185
-
This is a test of verbalisms. Do we use one term for kin and extrapolate from th
This is a test of verbalisms. Do we use one term for kin and extrapolate from there, or do we use a series beginning with kin selection, or do we take the terms from behavioral economics, and talk in the term of discounts. There are multiple term-category conflicts in this space.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 00:46:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175934427270209537
Reply addressees: @User1233213
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175933781062115328
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@User1233213 Kin selection is demonstrated in every single stage of social order from the drowning test, friend selection, to neighborhood selection, to workplace, to voting patterns, to buying and art patterns. Clannishness varies as does trust by race and subrace. WTF are you talking about?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175933781062115328
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@User1233213 Kin selection is demonstrated in every single stage of social order from the drowning test, friend selection, to neighborhood selection, to workplace, to voting patterns, to buying and art patterns. Clannishness varies as does trust by race and subrace. WTF are you talking about?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175933781062115328
-
Again. Dimensions. 0. Logic = Constant relations of sense perceptions. 1. Identi
Again. Dimensions.
0. Logic = Constant relations of sense perceptions.
1. Identity =(NAMES)
– Internally consistent, not inconsistent, sets of properties
– Constant Relations between… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=469511913645704&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-21 00:23:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175203913303244801