4. As such your proposition seeks a permissive definition under which we do not scrutinize (practice skepticism). Are his assets earned? Are here breasts real? Are you signaling VIRTUE WITH OTHER PEOPLE’S MONEY. And that’s the question that plagues us. The virtue signal theft.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 16:36:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176173594751184898
Reply addressees: @EPoe187
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176173233659404289
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@EPoe187 3. So the presumption in the literature is that it’s ‘evidence’. If it is just communication, then the central problem is that humans innovate to lie (cheat) more than they innovate to compete (produce).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1176173233659404289
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@EPoe187 3. So the presumption in the literature is that it’s ‘evidence’. If it is just communication, then the central problem is that humans innovate to lie (cheat) more than they innovate to compete (produce).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1176173233659404289
Leave a Reply