Category: Epistemology and Method

  • P IS EASIER THAN THAT by John Mark It’s way faster/easier to learn to think talk

    P IS EASIER THAN THAT

    by John Mark

    It’s way faster/easier to learn to think talk in “operational language” (and force others to that standard, and to the standard of the 5-pt definition of recipricity) than to go thru a checklist of 2 dozen fallacies. (See my video “Don’t Talk Like a Leftist”.)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 09:09:00 UTC

  • RUSSIAN LANGUAGE LIKE MANY CANT FULLY TRANSLATE ENGLISH IDEAS (context: how prop

    RUSSIAN LANGUAGE LIKE MANY CANT FULLY TRANSLATE ENGLISH IDEAS

    (context: how propertarianism is difficult to translate because the anglo saxon conversion of family bias to commons bias and common ownership never occurred elsehwere.)

    —“Has Russia always been that way? Or did they have a “golden age” so to speak where either the language was different, the ideas were different, or both?”—Bradley Morgan

    Every language retains embellishments and scars, every literature and culture embellishments and scars, and every people’s self imiage retains embellishments and scars.

    Russia emerged into modernity behind the rest of christendom simply because (a) distance from the core of commerce, (b) missing out on early adaptation to returns on atlantic trade, the renaissance, the british empirical revolution, the reformation, the continental enlightenment, and (c) having the legacy of mongol conquest, and (d) a long history of serfdom – the boyars were far worse than european feudal lords, and nothing close to west germanic (anglo-scandianvian) free men. In other words, they were just more removed from the center of the european restoration after the exit of the semitic dark ages.

    And Russian Literature was and remains the high point of literature in Christendom. And it occurred partly – as did germany – in response to the terrors of france (napoleon’s conquests).

    There was nothing wrong with Russia that the first world war did not create. It had nowhere near the problems of say Italy. And was closest to following the german unification. Germany at the time included most of what we consider Poland. And german influence was across the entire holy roman empire other than France and Spain. Russia had used her new freedoms to replace the mongols and conquer all of Eurasia from the borders of eastern Europe to Canada, and if they hadn’t been stopped (wrongly) by the British they would have retaken Constantinople from the turks and reversed all the costs of the dark ages.

    The problems of Russia, like the problems of germay, liek the present problem in america, is the result of the jewish bolshevik seizure of power in the unstable period at the end of WW1.

    The Russian language is part of the slavic family of languages that is indeed indo european but went through a strange phonetic rotation, which I am not skilled enough to explain but was the result of moving the glottal sounds backward and then due to that cost, losing the soft vowels, leading to counter- intuitive pairs of consonants without interstitial vowels we expect in wester civilization.

    The structure of Russian language (a category iv language – meaning hard to learn) does not require word order organization like english, and still relies on many (many) suffixes that can be overwhelming.

    However, this means there is as great an art in manipulating the russian language to all softs of parallels and suggestions and subtle meanings as there is an art of doing the same with our huge english vocabulary. And much of russian humor is dependent upon those who are cunning with their language in this form.

    It is also very… beautiful … in that it’s still a heroic language, a language of people on the farm, who are dependent upon community, who will suffer anything and survive, and are very proud of their heroism of endurance

    .

    So this is why Russian literature and culture is ‘deep’

    Because it is deep.

    As deep as americans are shallow.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 18:52:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/83762105_197785768286251_15359929147

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/83762105_197785768286251_1535992914797133824_o_197785758286252.jpg THE P-METHODOLOGY WE USE IN RESTORING OUR RULE OF LAW OF SOVEREIGNSTHE P-METHODOLOGY WE USE IN RESTORING OUR RULE OF LAW OF SOVEREIGNS


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 18:18:00 UTC

  • This is a secular theological, or philosophical, rather than scientific or opera

    This is a secular theological, or philosophical, rather than scientific or operational description. I understand the “strange’ continental obsession with restoring the theology of the church with some secular theology – from rousseau to kant to marx to present europe is ‘stuck’.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 16:05:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224000942862929924

    Reply addressees: @Hauptgefreiter1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223999940432683009


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223999940432683009

  • exactly. it is a very precise language, with a huge vocabulary, with german stru

    exactly. it is a very precise language, with a huge vocabulary, with german structure and common prose, french political prose, latin and greek intellectual prose, with scientific and technical, legal and philosophical, and theological and literary nuance to draw from.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 16:01:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223999883515920384

    Reply addressees: @DeguTanya @FloraMaeBaker @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto @BarackObama @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223997429361463296


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223997429361463296

  • You are using non- operational terms. Try to say the same thing in operational t

    You are using non- operational terms. Try to say the same thing in operational terms. It will expose that you are trying to steal by fraud.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 15:04:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223985526971228161

    Reply addressees: @WildHerbWays @SPQRIUS @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223984942624858116


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223984942624858116

  • ” It is interesting to see how there are difficulties in translating propertaria

    —-” It is interesting to see how there are difficulties in translating propertarian terms and definitions into another language. Can it be because the Anglo-world had evolved many of the P concepts first, and then Curt had scientifically described them? Other languages and nations were not at the same level. I think that German may be the second best language to translate P into. But in my experience concisely translating things like “agency” “commons” and “reciprocity” in Russian is fairly hard. Appears to correlate with how russian empire and then the soviet union was – no agency for people, no reciprocity, and going from no commons to all commons at the costs of millions of lives to virtually no gain”—James Dmitro Makienko

    Yep.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 12:47:00 UTC

  • REMINDER – NO MEMES. Please don’t post memes. I don’t tolerate memes. I teach ar

    REMINDER – NO MEMES.

    Please don’t post memes. I don’t tolerate memes. I teach argument. There are plenty of places to demonstrate you can’t. This isn’t one of them


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 19:47:00 UTC

  • THE THREE-C,Q METHOD 1. Compliment 2. Comment 3. Connection 4. Question How to a

    THE THREE-C,Q METHOD

    1. Compliment

    2. Comment

    3. Connection

    4. Question

    How to answer questions in text.

    THE E-PRIME METHOD

    1. Eliminate the verb to be, and plan your sentence accordingly.

    THE OPERATIONAL METHOD

    1. Complete sentences

    2. Operational vocabulary

    3. Single POV

    4. Describe a complete change in state.

    PROPERTARIAN METHOD

    1. Using economic terms

    2. To describe changes in property in toto as a consequence of both incentives and changes in state.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 18:58:00 UTC

  • WE DO HAVE A NAME FOR IT: DISAMBIGUATION by Bill Joslin —“I think one of the a

    WE DO HAVE A NAME FOR IT: DISAMBIGUATION

    by Bill Joslin

    —“I think one of the aspects of mental existence we have no name for yet …”—CurtD

    But we do have a name for it: its called disambiguation. And as far as I understand the fundamental process of the brain exists as a neuronal competition for caloric reward granted by disambiguation of sensory data which affords further acquisition of calories (to reduce it to a base level).

    Disambiguation – as far as I’m concerned – is the term.

    The issue with human suffering – or more aptly, human objectivity – pertains to the difficulty entailed in disambiguating jntentionality of our predictive faculty whereby past predictions (intentionally held to maintain POV) of this moment becomes superimposed upon sensory faculty – and thus results in an ambiguity (an ambiguation) which that reaps caloric rewards.

    The tough nut being disambiguating the array of self generated models (predictions) which persist due to higher predicted rewards (preference) from models that survive pattern matching to updated inputs.

    But its kind of simple – the former requires effort and is often accompanied by excitation or tension. the later provides relief because once the model matches the input, the caloric cost of the model comes to and end – no more effort required.

    it takes effort to be incorrect. coming into correction is like coming to rest. truth is the reprieve that escapist desire.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 18:12:00 UTC