The logic is the same because logic merely refers to constant relations (consistency).
Consistency between WHAT is always the question. 😉
Reply addressees: @PoshMePretty
Category: Epistemology and Method
-
The logic is the same because logic merely refers to constant relations (consist
-
The logic is the same because logic merely refers to constant relations (consist
The logic is the same because logic merely refers to constant relations (consistency).
Consistency between WHAT is always the question. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-29 23:40:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288620516903968769
Reply addressees: @PoshMePretty
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288620353514811392
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@PoshMePretty Well, I think the question is the premises. 😉
Limiting Constant Relations To:
1. Actions: Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Materialism (Science)
2. Speech: Idealism, Verbalism, Dualism (Philosophy)
3. Emotions, Imagination, Supernaturalism, Spiritualism: (Theology)Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1288620353514811392
-
Well, I think the question is the premises. 😉 Limiting Constant Relations To: 1
Well, I think the question is the premises. 😉
Limiting Constant Relations To:
1. Actions: Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Materialism (Science)
2. Speech: Idealism, Verbalism, Dualism (Philosophy)
3. Emotions, Imagination, Supernaturalism, Spiritualism: (Theology)
Reply addressees: @PoshMePretty -
Well, I think the question is the premises. 😉 Limiting Constant Relations To: 1
Well, I think the question is the premises. 😉
Limiting Constant Relations To:
1. Actions: Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Materialism (Science)
2. Speech: Idealism, Verbalism, Dualism (Philosophy)
3. Emotions, Imagination, Supernaturalism, Spiritualism: (Theology)
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-29 23:40:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288620353514811392
Reply addressees: @PoshMePretty
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288618725927780355
-
So please spare me ‘if it was simple’ nonsense. Literacy, mathematics, geometry,
So please spare me ‘if it was simple’ nonsense. Literacy, mathematics, geometry, calculus, programming, optics, magnetism, relativity, quantum mechanics, chemistry, biochemistry, neurology, cognitive science aren’t “Simple”. Neither is the formal logic of the sentient sciences.
-
So please spare me ‘if it was simple’ nonsense. Literacy, mathematics, geometry,
So please spare me ‘if it was simple’ nonsense. Literacy, mathematics, geometry, calculus, programming, optics, magnetism, relativity, quantum mechanics, chemistry, biochemistry, neurology, cognitive science aren’t “Simple”. Neither is the formal logic of the sentient sciences.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-29 17:38:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288529396819808260
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288528817351532544
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
And while the Abrahamic peoples including the xians tried to destroy the philosophers, reason, realism, naturalism, operationalism, empiricism, and science. And while aristotle’s work was left unfinished – the european system of thought is no longer unfinished. It was just HARD.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1288528817351532544
-
Everyone in the future will practice some version of P-logic and law becuase it
Everyone in the future will practice some version of P-logic and law becuase it solves the problem of extending the formal (logical), and physical (material) sciences into the human (metaphysics, language, psychology, sociology, ethics, politics, and law) as a single logic.
-
Everyone in the future will practice some version of P-logic and law becuase it
Everyone in the future will practice some version of P-logic and law becuase it solves the problem of extending the formal (logical), and physical (material) sciences into the human (metaphysics, language, psychology, sociology, ethics, politics, and law) as a single logic.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-29 17:34:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288528433455206402
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288528129284349953
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
But it’s one thing to explain logic, programming, calculus, relativity, or quantum mechanics and to PRACTICE it as a means of reasoning so that you UNDERSTAND IT. P-law consists of a profound innovation merging cognitive science, programmatic logic,accounting, economics, and law.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1288528129284349953
-
We can let the people remain ignorant of terms, or we can educate people in the
We can let the people remain ignorant of terms, or we can educate people in the meaning of terms. I have to teach what terms mean so that they cannot be abused. Those two phrases mean very different things.
So no. Lazy words produce lazy minds.
Reply addressees: @WrongThink_er @TruthQuest11 @billtalts @JulieBorowski -
We can let the people remain ignorant of terms, or we can educate people in the
We can let the people remain ignorant of terms, or we can educate people in the meaning of terms. I have to teach what terms mean so that they cannot be abused. Those two phrases mean very different things.
So no. Lazy words produce lazy minds.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-29 13:34:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288467858817781760
Reply addressees: @WrongThink_er @TruthQuest11 @billtalts @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288419047789469696