The Method – Introducing The Presenter and the Institute
https://youtu.be/VqhkEPmhXLw
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-28 03:29:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387247590052356098
The Method – Introducing The Presenter and the Institute
https://youtu.be/VqhkEPmhXLw
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-28 03:29:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387247590052356098
The Method – A Preface
https://youtu.be/sp49myLW5fw
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-28 03:29:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387247585031823361
The Method Part I – An Overview of the Method
https://youtu.be/qBwfWcBPjAA
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-27 20:29:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387141874188754944
The purpose of the scientific pursuit of truth is the discovery of first principles from which we can then practice a logic of those first principles. Chemistry is known. Physics has a few more steps. I’m explaining the universal logic of ALL first principles – esp. behavioral. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1386693441191497729
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-26 14:50:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386694206408871943
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1386693441191497729
Skepticism in pursuit of truth is necessary for exhaustive permutation+falsification. Conspiracy theorizing isn’t necessarily unscientific or irrational unless (a) it’s supporting justification of an intuition, (b) conflates common interest, incentive, intent, organization, plan.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-26 14:40:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386691622214189057
I don’t do humanities. I just do the data. 😉 there is consistency between physics, neurology, demonstrated behavior, evolution, their measurement in economics and in law. The first principles are consistent across all formal, physical, behavioral, evolutionary sciences.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-26 00:19:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386474954749882368
Reply addressees: @MMMalign @BLUNDERBUSSTED
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386463452953300994
Formal logic of decidability in science, economics, law and testimony. Writing proofs of construction from first causes in and across behavioral sciences. And no you wouldn’t understand. 🙂 It requires deep knowledge of multiple fields, not the least of which is cog sci. Cheers.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-25 23:28:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386462200450199558
Reply addressees: @MMMalign @BLUNDERBUSSTED
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386450731897602051
Disambiguate multiplivation and you have addition. The rule is arbitrary not necessary or consistent.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-25 15:56:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386348418579193865
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @milordog1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386343907395522561
Internal consistency which I illustrated in the three sets is that it would follow the truth table.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-25 15:34:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386342936493924355
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @milordog1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386342384250798085
T & T = T _ 1 + 1 = 2 _ 1 * 1 = 1
T & F = F _ 1 + -1 = 0 _ 1 * -1 = -1
F & F = F _ -1 + -1 = -2 _ -1 * -1 = (?) Why?
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-25 15:21:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386339493217701890
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @milordog1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1386337681517465601