The Method – Part I – Operational Sentences (Prose)
https://youtu.be/UwFKSX60CrA
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-02 12:29:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1388833037987762176
The Method – Part I – Operational Sentences (Prose)
https://youtu.be/UwFKSX60CrA
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-02 12:29:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1388833037987762176

Screenshot from Episode of The Method: “The Grammars”, that explains the evolution of language from movement: wayfinding. So, yes, we’re bots. Get over it. 😉

Source date (UTC): 2021-05-02 11:58:27 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106165482755126667

Screenshot from Episode of The Method: “The Grammars”, that explains the evolution of language from movement: wayfinding. So, yes, we’re bots. Get over it. 😉 https://t.co/UWasfi838S

Source date (UTC): 2021-05-02 11:55:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1388824589107613698
Recorded The Method Part 1 – Operational Sentences today. Rendering now. Have two versions. Tomorrow, I think, we’ll do the grammars.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-01 23:25:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1388635611599355907
Or when change was so limited that regularity could be identified. And when the industrialization of lying required a church and generations, not an academy, intellectuals, and propaganda. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-30 21:51:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1388249612948025352
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1388249360106938374
One cannot condescending for speaking the truth of the vast inequality of ability, knowledge, achievement and value bettered us. To say otherwise is to suppress truth by lying. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-30 17:16:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1388180354427674627
Reply addressees: @ItsNotPersonal0 @euronewsliving @WWF
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1388138766301372416
Consensus exists to create social constructions of falsehood. If you had even the minimum knowledge of the history of intellectual technological and scientific development you would know that it’s not consensus but 3 generations of exhaustive falsification that discovers truth.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-30 04:45:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387991420208828422
Reply addressees: @The_Reckoning86 @euronewsliving @WWF
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387989828759851009
PHILOSOPHY IS NOW AN ARCHAIC RELIGION
From atop our accumulated knowledge, the history of thought is valuable b/c it explains how difficult it’s been, how often we failed, why almost everyone failed, how the pursuit of truthful testimony(science) succeeded despite those failures – but that otherwise, it’s nonsense.
The study of philosophy is now, like the study of theology, just cultural anthropology – the study of an archaic and primitive literature stumbling in the dark as testimony (science) emerged from the imaginary, ideal, sophomoric, pseudoscientific, and occult.
By and large, all but some few digits to the right of the decimal point are possess both agency and consciousness – and only after disciplined study and experience. Otherwise the degree to which humans are just another self domesticated animal is humiliating.
Speech isn’t enough to demarcate human from beast.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-29 22:50:16 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106151058895636940
The study of philosophy is now, like the study of theology, just cultural anthropology – the study of an archaic and primitive literature stumbling in the dark as testimony (science) emerged from the imaginary, ideal, sophomoric, pseudoscientific, and occult. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1387850293967208454
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-29 19:37:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387853546134065152
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1387850293967208454
From atop our accumulated knowledge, the history of thought is valuable b/c it explains how difficult it’s been, how often we failed, why almost everyone failed, how the pursuit of truthful testimony(science) succeeded despite those failures – but that otherwise, it’s nonsense.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-29 19:24:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387850293967208454
Reply addressees: @mr_scientism
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387845875637047299