The Final Iteration https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/the-final-iteration/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 13:56:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266730181512830976
The Final Iteration https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/the-final-iteration/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 13:56:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266730181512830976

—“In the final iteration is it not the pawnbroker/ money lender > government bond issuer > central banker that puts the globalist corporatist cosmopolitan Davos man (haute bourgeoisie) above our ultimate line of national defense (national monarchs, national/local nobility, local militia)?”—Scott De Warren
(The flip side of “I, Pencil”.) (probably an important lesson) Military(organization of territory) <> Judiciary (organization of cooperation-contract) <> Finance (organization of money(stored time)) <> Entrepreneurship (Organization of opportunity, capital, people) <> Professionals (organization of production(calculation)) <> Managers (Organization of people) <> Producers (Organization of resources) <> Distributors (organization of distribution) <> Trade (organization of transactions) <> Consumers (organization of consumption) <> Parents (organization of reproduction) <> teachers, priests, public intellectuals politicians ( sedation, facilitation, and amelioration of stress arising from scarcity, individual and familial irrelevance, and alienation in the division of labor upon which they depend.) Given the problem of “I,Pencil” (distribution of knowledge), an individual farmer has to input a lot of diverse knowledge and effort for low return on investment, in no small part because petroleum products, industrialization, fertilizer, feed were fully commoditized. A farmer organizes primary resources (animals, food stuffs) and as such must be a skilled craftsman (organizers of specialized resources) at the very limit of craftsman’s capital (tools – no other craftsman requires so many tools). But the returns on the organization of resources are small – there are few multipliers. As you move up the production hierarchy you are responsible for organizing more and more and more people – where there are multipliers. This is why Marx is wrong. In order to organize people by rational incentives, one must produce marginal competitive differences by which to influence their choices. As such the entire difficulty in organizing production is organizing the human beings in a vast network to engage in it with nothing other than the bribe of doing the work (payment).
(The flip side of “I, Pencil”.) (probably an important lesson) Military(organization of territory) <> Judiciary (organization of cooperation-contract) <> Finance (organization of money(stored time)) <> Entrepreneurship (Organization of opportunity, capital, people) <> Professionals (organization of production(calculation)) <> Managers (Organization of people) <> Producers (Organization of resources) <> Distributors (organization of distribution) <> Trade (organization of transactions) <> Consumers (organization of consumption) <> Parents (organization of reproduction) <> teachers, priests, public intellectuals politicians ( sedation, facilitation, and amelioration of stress arising from scarcity, individual and familial irrelevance, and alienation in the division of labor upon which they depend.) Given the problem of “I,Pencil” (distribution of knowledge), an individual farmer has to input a lot of diverse knowledge and effort for low return on investment, in no small part because petroleum products, industrialization, fertilizer, feed were fully commoditized. A farmer organizes primary resources (animals, food stuffs) and as such must be a skilled craftsman (organizers of specialized resources) at the very limit of craftsman’s capital (tools – no other craftsman requires so many tools). But the returns on the organization of resources are small – there are few multipliers. As you move up the production hierarchy you are responsible for organizing more and more and more people – where there are multipliers. This is why Marx is wrong. In order to organize people by rational incentives, one must produce marginal competitive differences by which to influence their choices. As such the entire difficulty in organizing production is organizing the human beings in a vast network to engage in it with nothing other than the bribe of doing the work (payment).
It will profoundly normalize life. It will also do wonderful things to the capital sector as it must seek longer term investments.
Combined with right to repair, and minimum durable use, it will make a huge difference.
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 21:24:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266480468540772356
Reply addressees: @EricLiford
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266479753336369156
Zero interest on durable consumer goods, when borrowed from the treasury. Zero enforceability of consumer debt. In other words, you loan at hazard, because you can’t bait into hazard. This will end the collection industry and all the negative incentives that result from credit.
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 21:16:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266478656144236548
Reply addressees: @EricLiford
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266477245616586757
The Malincentive https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/the-malincentive/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 21:10:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266476994180665346
Mar 5, 2020, 1:25 PM
—“What would be the propertarian view on lending with interest? Or investment banking?”—
Interest is necessary for temporal calculation of production, distribution and trade, but not for consumption. All end point interest, meaning consumer credit on capital purchases (durable goods) under fiat money(a fractional share in the economy) is rent seeking (prohibited). Houses, boats, cars, appliances, furniture, clothing etc – anything not entertainment is rent seeking. If we exchange zero interest for accelerated payments we dont disrupt the pricing system (rapidly) but we do rapidly make children affordable. Similarly there appears to be little value in private insurance against catastrophe. Anything that can be calculated with that degree of statistical precision, yet it subject to the creation of rent seeking and hazard in the business side, can be done without the business side as a non-profit treasury run piece of infrastructure.
Mar 5, 2020, 1:25 PM
—“What would be the propertarian view on lending with interest? Or investment banking?”—
Interest is necessary for temporal calculation of production, distribution and trade, but not for consumption. All end point interest, meaning consumer credit on capital purchases (durable goods) under fiat money(a fractional share in the economy) is rent seeking (prohibited). Houses, boats, cars, appliances, furniture, clothing etc – anything not entertainment is rent seeking. If we exchange zero interest for accelerated payments we dont disrupt the pricing system (rapidly) but we do rapidly make children affordable. Similarly there appears to be little value in private insurance against catastrophe. Anything that can be calculated with that degree of statistical precision, yet it subject to the creation of rent seeking and hazard in the business side, can be done without the business side as a non-profit treasury run piece of infrastructure.
“IS TAXATION DYSGENIC?” https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/is-taxation-dysgenic/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 12:34:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266347088591360004