Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy

  • Hamster Wheel of Urban Economics

    Jan 5, 2020, 5:20 PM Proximity decreases opportunity costs (time). Decreases in opportunity costs increase transactions. Increases in transactions increase monetary velocity. Monetary velocity increases the possibility of consumption. Increases in consumption increase the possibility of taxation. An increase in taxation increases the possibility of commons. Increases in commons produce increases in demand for use (if not consumption) Increase in use of commons creates demand for government An increase in demand for the government creates increases in opportunities for rent. Increase in opportunity for rent increase rents. Increases in rents decrease the opportunity for commons and consumption and… you see where this goes. There is greater incentive and control in accessing rents than in creating or using commons or production. As in all cases rents accumulate until maintenance of commons is impossible Incomes decline. Rents and debt remain. Top margin leaves. Leaving only extractors (financial sector), and rent extractors (dependence and the state). Finally the major industries leave. And that’s it. Urban death follows. The only possibility is external wealth, such as Byzantium could extract as trade moved through the narrow straights. This is why the middle east is a disaster. It evolved to specialize in parasitism not production. When the trade route fell because of the age of sail it was dark ages for them, just as the Muslim destruction of Mediterranean trade caused the economic dark ages in Europe. The Hamster Wheel of economics.

  • Hamster Wheel of Urban Economics

    Jan 5, 2020, 5:20 PM Proximity decreases opportunity costs (time). Decreases in opportunity costs increase transactions. Increases in transactions increase monetary velocity. Monetary velocity increases the possibility of consumption. Increases in consumption increase the possibility of taxation. An increase in taxation increases the possibility of commons. Increases in commons produce increases in demand for use (if not consumption) Increase in use of commons creates demand for government An increase in demand for the government creates increases in opportunities for rent. Increase in opportunity for rent increase rents. Increases in rents decrease the opportunity for commons and consumption and… you see where this goes. There is greater incentive and control in accessing rents than in creating or using commons or production. As in all cases rents accumulate until maintenance of commons is impossible Incomes decline. Rents and debt remain. Top margin leaves. Leaving only extractors (financial sector), and rent extractors (dependence and the state). Finally the major industries leave. And that’s it. Urban death follows. The only possibility is external wealth, such as Byzantium could extract as trade moved through the narrow straights. This is why the middle east is a disaster. It evolved to specialize in parasitism not production. When the trade route fell because of the age of sail it was dark ages for them, just as the Muslim destruction of Mediterranean trade caused the economic dark ages in Europe. The Hamster Wheel of economics.

  • You don’t need to go to university to undrestand econ

    You don’t need to go to university to undrestand econ https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/you-dont-need-to-go-to-university-to-undrestand-econ/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 14:37:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266740640035082240

  • You don’t need to go to university to undrestand econ

    Feb 4, 2020, 3:38 PM I’m still not sure economics is something you need to go to school for unless you plan on spending a life doing basic research by scouring the world for other people’s data sets. Calculus, Statistics, (good)Math for Physics instead of (bad) math for economics yes. Aside from that, reading a micro and a macro textbook, learning about 150 ‘rules of thumb’, reading Gary Becker’s work on the Economics of Human Behavior, and maybe Rothbard’s Mystery of Banking is enough. It’s mostly common sense, it’s just that it’s invisible and the entire financial system is absurd and arcane (and immoral) and the entire political system simply lies like hell every day because darwin is unacceptable to democracy and marxism. In a perfect world I’d just crank out classes for the institute, because people want a non-woo-woo education – but revolution calls.

  • You don’t need to go to university to undrestand econ

    Feb 4, 2020, 3:38 PM I’m still not sure economics is something you need to go to school for unless you plan on spending a life doing basic research by scouring the world for other people’s data sets. Calculus, Statistics, (good)Math for Physics instead of (bad) math for economics yes. Aside from that, reading a micro and a macro textbook, learning about 150 ‘rules of thumb’, reading Gary Becker’s work on the Economics of Human Behavior, and maybe Rothbard’s Mystery of Banking is enough. It’s mostly common sense, it’s just that it’s invisible and the entire financial system is absurd and arcane (and immoral) and the entire political system simply lies like hell every day because darwin is unacceptable to democracy and marxism. In a perfect world I’d just crank out classes for the institute, because people want a non-woo-woo education – but revolution calls.

  • Our Proposal Is Hard to Refuse

    Our Proposal Is Hard to Refuse https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/our-proposal-is-hard-to-refuse-3/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 14:10:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266733692023644162

  • Our Proposal Is Hard to Refuse

    Feb 5, 2020, 7:41 PM P-Constitution, it’s nationalization of consumer credit, and its prohibitions on rent seeking, will destroy the entire rent seeking structure of the western economies, preserving only those investments that contribute to production. The entire insurance industry, mortgage industry, credit card industry, and any business that makes it’s money from credit rather than production and sale of goods and services will collapse with all the wealth retained by the laboring, working, and middle classes. The Concentration of wealth in DC, NY and via New York to Hollywood/LA will vaporize within months. Investors will flee to Assets. The prohibition on baiting into hazard, and the institution of involuntary warranty; the liability for testimonial speech in public, restoration of defamation, and the extension of defamation to defense of the commons; and the loss of copyright protection other than creative commons will collapse the media and advertising business as they desperately seek to reform. Capital will seek safety first, then alliance with the treasury on investments, and the states will have no alternative than to follow germany, japan, and south korea into competing with china on tech, and depriving china of its market. The requirement for right to repair and limits to labor arbitrage will restore european markets. The distribution of liquidity directly to citizens to maintain spending, and the deprivation of ‘undesirables’ from this distribution will drive them out of the market. This strategy amounts to paying off the middle to destroy the top and bottom.

  • Marxian Economics Do Not Merit More than A Footnote

    Marxian Economics Do Not Merit More than A Footnote https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/marxian-economics-do-not-merit-more-than-a-footnote/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 14:09:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266733377954160642

  • Marxian Economics Do Not Merit More than A Footnote

    Feb 6, 2020, 1:27 PM by Daniel Gurpide The utter inanity of Marxian economics is so evident that the person who is first and foremost a revolutionary and merely seeks for a rational excuse to preach the overturn of the existing order has to look in other directions, towards other social layers to whom preach the revolutionary gospel. That’s why the New Left, Cultural Marxism and Postmodernists appeal to the outcasts of modern society, to the eternal Lumpenproletariat, the term understood not in a sociological sense.

  • Marxian Economics Do Not Merit More than A Footnote

    Feb 6, 2020, 1:27 PM by Daniel Gurpide The utter inanity of Marxian economics is so evident that the person who is first and foremost a revolutionary and merely seeks for a rational excuse to preach the overturn of the existing order has to look in other directions, towards other social layers to whom preach the revolutionary gospel. That’s why the New Left, Cultural Marxism and Postmodernists appeal to the outcasts of modern society, to the eternal Lumpenproletariat, the term understood not in a sociological sense.