Curt Doolittle

Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • WHY IS KANT UNFORIVABLE? —“Specifically what about Kant is unforgivable?”—Be

    WHY IS KANT UNFORIVABLE?

    —“Specifically what about Kant is unforgivable?”—Benjamin Thurston

    Inventing pseudorationalism that (1) provided an excuse to circumvent the anglo invention of empiricism, (2) created the possibility for the ‘pseudo-rational, post-mystical, fantasy moral literature that we call continental philosophy”, and (3) gave Marx and the cosmopolitans the means of verbal deception necessary to fool so many people by loading, framing, and overloading. (4) and led to the postmoderns, critical theory / political correctness movement.

    In other words, by attempting to restate christianity in pseudorational terms, he created the next generation of mysticism: pseudorationalism as the subsequent means of literary deception, which was then taken up by the jews (cosmopolitans) who combined it with jewish law (poly ethical poly logical) to create pseudoscience: boaz, marx, freud, cantor, mises, {the frankfurt school}, rothbard(libertinism), and strauss(neoconism).

    In other words, he created a technical revolution in religion as a way to lie by suggestion. A way that it has taken me most of my life to counter.

    The british worked so hard to create the scientific enlightenment by observing the record of empirical law, and tried to restore our ancient order (natural law), and then Kant comes along and restates christianity in a new form of mysticism before the empirical project had been completed.

    (PS: It appears that marx knew he was lying by saying something on the order of “…but I have written it all as dialectic (what we call Pilpul) so I can’t be held accountable if I’m wrong…”. )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-18 14:06:00 UTC

  • WHAT COULD I DEBATE CHRIS ABOUT? Something meaningful? I mean, I don’t follow hi

    WHAT COULD I DEBATE CHRIS ABOUT?

    Something meaningful? I mean, I don’t follow him. He’s a populist. But I get the impression that I don’t really disagree with him about much (at the level he discourses).

    I suspect he’s still in the ‘rothbardian’ (libertine) ideology, rather than classical liberal (libertarian) ideology, and certainly not in my camp (sovereignty), and I suspect not fascism(tribal authoritarianism).

    I suspect he’s still practicing cosmopolitanism(universalism) rather than nationalism(particularism).

    I suspect he’s still a ‘NAP’-er.

    He seems reasonably red-pilled (masculinity). I mean, that’s the only clear value I can deduce from the content of his reading list.

    He seems pretty anti-state, rather than anti-discretion or pro rule of law.

    He seems pretty pro-violence (which is what I care about).

    What could I debate him about?

    What would you like me to ‘correct’ him about?

    Thanks

    Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-18 13:49:00 UTC

  • THE LEFT’S CASTING OF GENDER SPECIALIZATION AS CLASS WARFARE – BUT MASCULINITY I

    THE LEFT’S CASTING OF GENDER SPECIALIZATION AS CLASS WARFARE – BUT MASCULINITY IS A VIRTUE NOT A VICE

    January 11, 2017 by Alberto Zambrano

    —“The left has to use indignation and offenses because it is absolutely incapable of using the truth without exposing itself.

    So, given the inability to use the truth, the leftists extract their cooperative procedures and threaten to withdraw.

    We must respond to the threats of retreat as severely as we respond to threats or to those who cheat or cheat us.

    This is deeply important as a concept to study in the sick behavior of the leftists.

    There is a lot of research that confirms how we react to such lies and rejections, those differences are biological, existent and widely diffused. And those same researches have shown that the female sex is more sensitive to them, which is why the left has sought to seize the vanguard of women.

    As men we must fight at all costs to retain the integrity of our group. We are genetically programmed by nature to do so. And it affects us at cognitive levels in the same way that music affects us.

    The influence of our force is the ultimate strategy to defeat the left, to sabotage its norms, to challenge its conventions by being brutally honest causes the mass withdrawal of the lies that the leftists throw at us daily.

    If we raise not only the level of debate, but our ability to create a vanguard that borders the left, we will have won the ideological war by default. The cost of cohesion and internal preferences for our own group, cooperating with our peers, and caring for our women and children creates in the left a series of doubts that they consider dangerous threats for their survival since the leftists appeal to what We do not protect as a group for them to create avant-garde.

    The left rejects the masculine character of the struggle and substitutes it for the class struggle, putting us in a terrain where we are equal in a struggle that does not exist. If we reject the class struggle and rejoice at the true meaning of the blood, sweat and tears that men have shed in order to make their nations great, we will have made our great nations again and we will have gained them to the left.

    Masculinity is positive, desirable and attractive to the opposite sex

    Just as femininity is fundamental to civilization, to preserve the species, and to cultivate lasting relationships, masculinity is necessary to preserve the character and moral fiber of our nation.

    The left with its lies seeks to separate us from our women and children and put them against us.

    Leftist elites, with their false intelligentsia, produce silly and deceptive ideas that gain their status as a result of the merit of those who spit them out, and that these ideas (feminism, gender ideology) parasitize our nation’s superior order of trust. These elites and those who follow them believe that they will win, and may do so unless we have patience and do not alter the conditions under which they are able to exploit the higher order of trust upon which our nation depends.

    If our superior order of trust is so superior that it is impassable for the left, we will preserve a society and nation that can flourish homogeneously, a tactic that the left, so ethnically, morally, and ideologically heterogeneous, is incapable of preserving without entering into Fundamental contradictions of their own ideals.

    It is for this reason that the left is unable to obtain and maintain the loyalty of the interests of the other classes without maintaining a proper warrior and masculine class of its own.”—

    Alberto R. Zambrano U.

    In collaboration for The Propertarian Institute.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-18 13:32:00 UTC

  • CONGRATULATE Alberto Zambrano ON BRINGING PROPERTARIANISM TO SPANISH SPEAKERS. F

    https://propertarianism.com/category/attributes/espanol-spanish/PLEASE CONGRATULATE Alberto Zambrano ON BRINGING PROPERTARIANISM TO SPANISH SPEAKERS.

    For the past six months or so Alberto R Zambrano has been producing (a) ORIGINAL WORK in Spanish for Propertarianism.com, and (b) TRANSLATING important articles in to Spanish.

    His original pieces are exceptional. His translations also. I wish we could do the same in Italian, German, Ukrainian, and Russian!!!!!

    In my view this scale of work, and its quality, qualifies him for membership in the propertarian institute. So I’m adding him to the list of contributors.

    Here is a link to the Spanish Language articles:

    https://propertarianism.com/category/attributes/espanol-spanish/

    (I wish I could make this post ‘sticky’!)

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    (I’ll post his most recent article, translated into english, above.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-18 13:30:00 UTC

  • OVERVIEW OF PROPERTARIANISM FOR SERIOUS NEWBIES

    https://propertarianism.com/2016/01/05/an-overview-of-propertarianism-for-serious-newbies/REMINDER: OVERVIEW OF PROPERTARIANISM FOR SERIOUS NEWBIES

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-18 11:46:00 UTC

  • THIS AS LEGIT? If it’s true I’m making cupcakes and celebrating. Thieves. Guess

    http://worldpoliticus.com/2017/01/16/hillary-clinton-decided-fire-employees-clinton-foundation-done/CONFIRM THIS AS LEGIT?

    If it’s true I’m making cupcakes and celebrating. Thieves.

    Guess i’ll never get my 2m back from them now… lol

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-18 03:22:00 UTC

  • “This is so awesome. To finally find a way of looking at the world that doesn’t

    —“This is so awesome. To finally find a way of looking at the world that doesn’t cause me massive cognitive dissonance, as well as endless qualifiers in conversations.

    Propertarianism is the future of the right.

    Thanks Curt and Ely.”—- Daniel Travis

    Made my day.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-17 19:46:00 UTC

  • WORTH REPEATING (important concepts)

    WORTH REPEATING

    (important concepts)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-17 10:34:00 UTC

  • (from elsewhere) James, if this is a forum for discussion, then it’s a value. Wh

    (from elsewhere)

    James, if this is a forum for discussion, then it’s a value. Which would require posting both sides of the debate. If this is a form for you to express your frustrations then it is no longer anything to do with theory policy and philosophy, but simply just emotional. Just create an “I hate trump” forum and put it there. But at present you’re not acting any differently from the alt-right-green-frog folks except your posting pseudo-rational propaganda instead of openly irrational green-frog cartoons.

    You have energy and a particular gift. And if you employ it honestly then you can make a contribution to the world.

    I’m honest about my work and my bias. (and yes, the fact that The Clinton Foundation defrauded me of $2M they said they would pay me for developing the greenhouse-gas measurement software, after we rescued their efforts in India at Microsoft’s request; and the fact that I have direct experience with these people – including Murdoch’s wife – might color my judgement a bit. These are ‘bad’ immoral, people for whom lying is simply a justifiable means of achieving their ends.)

    Anger destroys honesty. Half truths are lies. Half arguments are just half truths.

    Hence why I argue in the manner that I do: the only ‘good’ is exchange. The only ‘moral’ is non-imposition of costs.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-17 07:17:00 UTC

  • SCREWED AMERICA THE ‘CANCEROUS’ GENERATION

    https://www.amazon.com/Barbarians-Boomers-Immigrants-Screwed-Generation/dp/1541136942/BOOMERS SCREWED AMERICA

    THE ‘CANCEROUS’ GENERATION

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-15 21:09:00 UTC