WHAT COULD I DEBATE CHRIS ABOUT? Something meaningful? I mean, I don’t follow hi

WHAT COULD I DEBATE CHRIS ABOUT?

Something meaningful? I mean, I don’t follow him. He’s a populist. But I get the impression that I don’t really disagree with him about much (at the level he discourses).

I suspect he’s still in the ‘rothbardian’ (libertine) ideology, rather than classical liberal (libertarian) ideology, and certainly not in my camp (sovereignty), and I suspect not fascism(tribal authoritarianism).

I suspect he’s still practicing cosmopolitanism(universalism) rather than nationalism(particularism).

I suspect he’s still a ‘NAP’-er.

He seems reasonably red-pilled (masculinity). I mean, that’s the only clear value I can deduce from the content of his reading list.

He seems pretty anti-state, rather than anti-discretion or pro rule of law.

He seems pretty pro-violence (which is what I care about).

What could I debate him about?

What would you like me to ‘correct’ him about?

Thanks

Curt