Priceless https://t.co/8pv0NkRPch
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-05 15:11:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158395140807020544
Priceless https://t.co/8pv0NkRPch
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-05 15:11:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158395140807020544
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-05 14:05:19 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102564752220256045
RT @Steve_Sailer: @JJPeregrine @AdamRutherford Thanks.
However, “folk taxonomies” means the opposite of Linnaean taxonomies, but of cours…
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-05 12:25:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158353425660297216
Boost of @tradition
This graphic is powerful and important, fam!! Let’s make it go viral everywhere!
https://twitter.com/DSAMikeP/status/1158259496524943360
‘Mass shootings being a “white thing” is a malicious lie that is used to silence and intimidate whites. Here are all mass shooters for 2019. Data comes from the wikipedia list. Shooters are overwhelmingly black. Leftists, anarchists and LGBT activists outnumber white nationalists.” — Mike Enoch

Source date (UTC): 2019-08-05 09:57:03 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102563943403626623
So that means you’re going to stop opining on twitter?
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-04 23:31:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158158556509757440
Reply addressees: @adversescrutiny
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158158364859351041
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158158364859351041
Are you trying to tell me what to do with my body, to limit my freedom of speech, to oppress my right of expression; that you won’t respect differences of opinion, by people with different backgrounds and traditions, without having to deal with your complaint and criticism?
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-04 23:28:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158157778994847746
Reply addressees: @adversescrutiny
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158156389082181634
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158156389082181634
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-04 22:16:33 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102561021494548703
DOOLITTLE’S “SCAM” OR DOOLITTLE’S PLAN?
—“A handful of observant readers of your page might notice the whole scam that you have going here at this point:
You’re too much of a pussy even though you’re so full of ideology… Too much of a pussy to do the thing that you want to do so you get young impressionable men to listen to your words. They’ve got a little bit more piss and vinegar in them so they’ll actually go do the hard work for you without spending too much energy thinking about it. I don’t expect you to be so intellectually honest as to tell them all that’s what’s actually happening here right?”— Casey King, Jacksonville Florida.
( https://www.facebook.com/CaseyLKing)
—“Has that not been the underlying strategy for war since the dawn of civilization?”—John Dabb
Of course it is the underlying strategy for war since the dawn of civilization, and the dawn of man. He [Casey King] is just (like a woman) using GSRRM – in this case (a) a straw man, and (b) moralizing, and (c) shaming – because he doesn’t have an argument. Because dim people, lacking ability, experience, knowledge, and agency can only demonstrate disapproval and shaming and rallying – they have no other ability to work with.
The Straw Man
(a) You should run into public and so something dramatic, symbolic, and emotional (ie: be a woman).
(b) otherwise you are immoral (irreciprocal, dishonest)
(c) because, you are asking other men to run into the public and do something symbolic, and emotional (ie: be women).
Reality, Repeated Daily
(a) Doolittle’s Message is:
… Never act until we all act
(b) And
… Act when we have;
… … – a moral license (check)
… … – a set of actionable demands (check)
… … – a plan of transition (check)
… … – a means of winning by insurrection (check)
… When
… … – we can rally sufficient starting numbers (~.1M-1M) (Check)
… … – the overton window is over the conservative mean. (Almost)
… Where
… … – Our demands solve the problems of the era (check)
… … – it’s immoral to fail to accept them (check)
… … – giving us moral license for war to restore the constitution (check)
… Therefore
… … – We can negotiate and settle before violence.
… … – Or, We can escalate to force negotiation
… … – Or, We can escalate to force submission
… … – Or, We can escalate into decimation.
… Because
… … – we are the largest army in the world by orders of magnitude.
What is john doing?
What are curt and ely doing?
What are bill and the majority of Propertarians doing?
See?
But simpletons see the world through simpleton eyes.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-04 21:18:41 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102560793909538244
IT IS ONE THING TO SHAME THE ABSENCE OF ARGUMENT, AND ANOTHER TO SHAME BECAUSE OF ITS ABSENCE.
—“Haven’t you used the same ‘feminine’ approaches consistently to vilify the left.”—@adamszequi
—“We don’t seek to undermine their arguments, because they don’t have any. We seek to expose their lack of arguments. We don’t need to vilify them, their actions when brought to light condemn them better then anything we could ever do.”—Noah Revoy @noahrevoy
Adam, (All);
1) It is one thing to shame the absence of argument, and another to shame because of its absence.
2) If you encounter GSRRM (avoidance of argument) then respond with it, then repeat the central argument.
3) Use their shaming as a vehicle for distributing information: illustration of their lack of argument, their inability to provide one, and the counter argument in Propertarian (natural law) to demonstrate their attempted fraud or deceit..
4) Repeat this cycle until they give up, or all opportunity to spread the argument has been exhausted.
– Cheers
( cc @stefanmolyneux
Stefan uses the tolerant British(anglo) Technique of Wit.
I use the intolerant technique of Prosecution.
I have little ‘christian’ left in me.
It’s suicidal.
)
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-04 21:16:11 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102560784120723231
THE DEAD DON”T RESIST, AND THEY DON”T HAVE TO BE SENT HOME. 😉
So go home.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-04 21:04:49 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102560739441629925