SURVEY (REALLY)
(a) Is Curt Doolittle Alt-Right?
(b) if so, why?
(c) if not, then?
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 17:08:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180167926839689217
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
SURVEY (REALLY) (a) Is Curt Doolittle Alt-Right? (b) if so, why? (c) if not, the
-
( Resistance PGA has frustrated me for years. )
( Resistance PGA has frustrated me for years. )
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 14:17:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180124667958452224
Reply addressees: @hbdchick
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180118751095742464
IN REPLY TO:
@hbdchick
Polygenic adaptation after a sudden change in environment https://t.co/lCYkq0YPhY
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180118751095742464
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/72215863_478073399456222_18159492383
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/72215863_478073399456222_1815949238316564480_n_478073396122889.jpg SURVEY (REALLY)
(a) Is Curt Doolittle Alt-Right?
(b) if so, why?
(c) if not, then … ?
(via David German Hoppe)SURVEY (REALLY)
(a) Is Curt Doolittle Alt-Right?
(b) if so, why?
(c) if not, then … ?
(via David German Hoppe)
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 13:09:00 UTC
-
( A funny one for your collection @[1508617762:2048:Oksana Kavetska] )Updated Oc
( A funny one for your collection @[1508617762:2048:Oksana Kavetska] )Updated Oct 4, 2019, 9:46 AM
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 09:46:00 UTC
-
Those are your dad’s. Or, al least who she thinks is your dad – she isn’t sure.
Those are your dad’s. Or, al least who she thinks is your dad – she isn’t sure. Although your complexion is a bit off, isn’t it?
😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 04:59:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179984319626039296
Reply addressees: @Protagoris7788 @MartianHoplite @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179983317413720067
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179983317413720067
-
Neither do you, I see. And neither to the ex’s I’ve dumped. And neither did your
Neither do you, I see. And neither to the ex’s I’ve dumped. And neither did your mom – but it was reciprocal. I paid and left.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 04:33:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179977734342283265
Reply addressees: @Protagoris7788 @MartianHoplite @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179967066482204672
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179967066482204672
-
oh… That was good. You went there. lol
oh… That was good. You went there. lol
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 02:36:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179948335421153280
Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux @ScottAdamsSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179939438366883846
IN REPLY TO:
@StefanMolyneux
@ScottAdamsSays Especially because traditionally trolls do in fact eat babies.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179939438366883846
-
You’re way better at translating this kind of thing. I can’t do it. I know you c
You’re way better at translating this kind of thing. I can’t do it. I know you can. I have this feeling that if you could explain it to me enough to get it, then it might be worth talking to him. But so far he exasperates me too much to get through his work.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 01:20:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179929253049245696
Reply addressees: @PoseidonAwoke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179928857249550338
IN REPLY TO:
@PoseidonAwoke
@curtdoolittle In some ways this socio-sexual-psychological analysis of EMJ doesn’t feel as meaty as your economic analysis, but he’s definitely saying something similar to ‘dysgenia’, and he is def on the right track with “projection”.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179928857249550338
-
omfg
omfg
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 00:56:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179923136755781633
Reply addressees: @PoseidonAwoke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179000431722283008
IN REPLY TO:
@PoseidonAwoke
“Modernity is rationalized sexual misbehavior… The University system is nothing more than an elaborate rationalization of sexual misbehavior”.
There. He has it. At its root.
https://t.co/TGFB9mHE6oOriginal post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179000431722283008
-
“Modern Day Founding Fathers”
—“Also since I got your attention, I have never felt relief from discovering a political theory but propertarianism is genius. You and John mark are doing amazing work, truly modern day founding fathers. So thank you for doing this. It’s restored my faith for a better tomorrow.”—The Cultural Oncologist @CultureKancer
Made my day.