CHOOSING BETWEEN FEMININE LEFTIST LIES AND MASCULINE RIGHTIST TRUTH (In Response to the NYT) [T]he foundations of western civilization rely upon traditions we developed during the great age of transformation where we first came into being as western indo europeans. Those traditions are still with us. They are Truth before Face regardless of cost as contribution to the commons; Duty before Self and Family as contribution to the Commons, Heroism and Excellence as Contribution to the Commons; Sovereignty and Reciprocity in Law as contribution to the commons; Observance of The jury and their Verdict as contribution to the commons; Observance of, and Oath To these traditions for membership, and fighting others and defending our own, leaving only voluntary cooperation in markets in allways of life: association, cooperation, reproduction, production of goods and services, production of justice we call law, production of commons we call governing, and production of war – which to our ancestors was an entrepreneurial process, indifferent from the current economic which institutionalize that tradition in commerce. The differentiation between west and the rest is in this combination of Testimonial Truth, Grant of Reciprocity, and Sovereignty, as reciprocal insurance between each member of the polity having demonstrated by oath and payment in risk, his purchase of the franchise. ALthough in most simple terms, truthful speech is merely reciprocity warrantied, to be free of loading and framing. The NYT, The Monotheists, Marxists, Postmoderns and Neoliberal Left, want us to choose between contra-evidentiary Lying about anything and everything that obscures evidentiary truth of Gender, Race, Subrace, Culture, Class, Personality, Intelligence, and physical differences, and our use of markets to cooperate on means despite our differences in ability, preference and desired ends while advancing all of us together – presuming we limit the reproduction of the bottom quintile. That’s Choice is the question of the 20th Century playing out as a cold civil war on the verge of turning hot in the 21st: Restoring female genetic, and semitic civilizational strategy’s demand for equality that produces dysgenia and dark ages, or restoring Male and Western ( “Greek, Roman, Prussian” ) civilization’s demand for Meritocracy that produces eugenics and rapid innovation, dragging the rest of mankind and our women out of ignorance, poverty, superstition, hard labor, early death, infanticide, child labor, disease, and transforming ourselves into the gods the envious opposition imagine. There is only one solution to the civil war that the Feminine genetic and Semitic strategic left have created by attempt to restore dysgenic, stagnating, supernatural theology, with it’s updated versions using pseudoscience and sophism: Marx, Boax, Freud, Adorno, Derrida: Separation, Specialization, and Speciation along lines the European shrinking of the world, and the pressure of agrarian age’s compromise reversed. Europeans may have made a world of mankind from race, fist in the presumption of domestication under rule, then by enforcement of commercial self rule. But the effort has failed, and with it the world order we sought to build to organize, cooperate, and operate it. For while the female method of conflict of undermining dominant males by gossiping, rallying, shaming, ridicule, moralizing, psychologizing, and denial in order to suppress truth, and instill conflict, works while men tolerate it – in the end, men’s method of conflict resolution decides, because as always might determines whatever right exists whether or not it is reciprocal and naturally hierarchical as the masculine and eugenic world desires, or proportional as the feminine, equalitarian, and dysgenic world desires. So we can peacefully separate into your feminine egalitarian, deceitful, undermining, equalitarian, dysgenic, redistributive polity, and our masculine hierarchical, meritocratic, truth telling, market, eugenic polity – and we can leave you to the resulting squalor you seek to create – or we can war – in a war you cannot ever win. Because while the feminine means of undermining by selling supernatural false promise to females and slaves (immigrants, minorities, underclasses) in the ancient world was successful in destroying every great civilization that they could reach – all five of them- and worse than the bronze collapse of the sea peoples – enough of us are aware that you have fooled us once and caused a thousand year dark age from which the north sea people rescued mankind – kicking and screaming all the while – that we will not let this systemic undermining of civilization by imposing lies, sophisms, supernaturalism, pseudosciences of ignorance and dysgenia cause another dark age. So arm yourselves for war. Because recent events have been the last straw in our hope that you too could join the Aristocracy of Everyone the Greco Romans and the Modern Europeans invested their efforts into. And just as the left caused one hundred million deaths with your communist class warfare; you will have caused one hundred million deaths or more with your second attempt by creating gender and race warfare. The new Jewish heretics we call Christians destroyed the arts, literature, architecture, schools, of the ancient world, killed the philosophers who taught in them, prevented the restoration of roman aristocracy, and drowned our civilization in the superstition and ignorance that european truth and reason had rescued them from, and the monopoly of thought and governance that the hittites, then greeks, then romans, then all of europe rebelled against after centuries of piracy, slaving, and raiding our world, culminating in the destruction of old southeastern europe – which we cannot seem to reverse. So we learned from your destruction of knowledge, tradition, arts, literature, teachers, propagandists, intellectuals, customers, architecture, how civilizational warfare is conducted by means counter to western accommodation, inclusion, education, and the rewards of doing so. We domesticated warfare in the ancient world. We domesticated it further in the middle ages. We domesticated it elegantly by the Westphalian Peace. And we domesticated it since the world wars. And we tried in vain to domesticate you. And we learned from our mistakes – and you have not. So who are the producers of the propaganda, arts, literature, architecture and schools of the postwar era attempting to create the same destruction of the third great civilization of european peoples? You. So having learned that warfare must be conducted on the enemy’s terms, not our own domesticated terms, and that we must defeat you on your terms. Our law requires Restitution and Prevention, both by the individual actor, and by those who might imitate that actor. Restitution is easy. But Prevention will be brutal. Because we must create a punishment that provides sufficient incentives, that the repetition of the female strategy of undermining civilization, evolution, and our transcendence into the gods we imagine is never again attempted. We must carve a law into history that will last ten thousand years or more. So may your gods have mercy on you. Because we will not. 😉
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
RT @pumkinbaer: @JayMan471 The least rational policy prefs are found in childles
RT @pumkinbaer: @JayMan471 The least rational policy prefs are found in childless women educated at elite schools employed in verbal IQ job…
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 15:26:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180504419160473600
-
THE QUESTION IS, WHY ARE NYT ALLOWED TO TELL LIES, AND DENY THE TRUTH? —“NYT,
THE QUESTION IS, WHY ARE NYT ALLOWED TO TELL LIES, AND DENY THE TRUTH?
—“NYT, a propagandist: Why is anyone allowed to tell the truth? Me, an intellectual: Why are you allowed to tell lies?”–Implicit Eli – @MartianHoplite
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 15:24:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180504102226268160
Reply addressees: @nytopinion
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180097787658153984
IN REPLY TO:
@nytopinion
“Noxious speech is causing tangible harm. Yet this fact implies a question so uncomfortable that many of us go to great lengths to avoid asking it. Namely, what should we — the government, private companies or individual citizens — be doing about it?” https://t.co/tJQTFnBcOy
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180097787658153984
-
RT @MartianHoplite: NYT: Why is anyone allowed to tell the truth? Me, an intelle
RT @MartianHoplite: NYT: Why is anyone allowed to tell the truth?
Me, an intellectual: why are you allowed to tell lies? https://t.co/7CEys…
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 15:22:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180503589183250432
-
True. And it still can be. 😉
True. And it still can be. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 15:15:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180501826715750402
Reply addressees: @I_Vae_Victis_I
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180496699577503744
IN REPLY TO:
@I_Vae_Victis_I
F√¢k o££, Pinko!
The Moon should’ve been
the 51st State.
@curtdoolittleOriginal post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180496699577503744
-
TALEB, WOMEN, AND THE CATHEDRAL Taleb’s early books are an effort to feed his eg
TALEB, WOMEN, AND THE CATHEDRAL
Taleb’s early books are an effort to feed his ego (self image)
His later works are an effort to defend his ego (self image). He made a career popularizing… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=478639752732920&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 14:59:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180497773101289472
-
AS DELUDED AS MARX BUT WITH SOME ECONOMIC LITERACY THROWN IN THE MIX TO DAZZLE A
AS DELUDED AS MARX BUT WITH SOME ECONOMIC LITERACY THROWN IN THE MIX TO DAZZLE AND CONFUSE PEOPLE.
By: Daniel Jordan via Michael Hayes
I think it’s difficult for some people to get their brain out of a certain loop.
Once someone destroys the illusion that the wealthy are not by necessity rich due to exploitation of the poor because the pie isn’t fixed (only the past is a fixed pie). The next illusion that gets propped up is created by applying this logic to other avenues of life. The idea that mass migration cannot possibly effect you because again the ‘pie isn’t fixed’ or that it simply should not effect you if not for bad policies (excessive welfare state brought onto you by force of the government) and so the next illusion that is propped up in tandem with the non fixed pie view of immigration is the NAP(non aggression principal). And this farcical idea of speculative harm being out of the question for use of force.
Now we see the axiom that lays at the root of the ex socialist, neo-liberal.
The most important commodity in the commons is trust. Trust that for various biological/cultural reasons can be eroded.
NAP can collapse on its own merits if we even allow one iota of punishment for the most heinous of crimes such as murder. It’s not an axiom/ethic congruent with our nature to simply let evil walk free in the name of NAP. Consider the fact that the whole reason you lock someone up for murder is based on speculative future harm.
Take the idea of air pollution or water pollution. The latter can generally be solved efficiently through property rights and give people all the protection we need. The former requires targeted regulation due to the nature of the problems and that it’s not really possible to have someone own the air (other than perhaps air traffic rights). Both of these things however have to be backed up by the courts (force, aggression if you will) and both require proactive (speculative) measures.
Libertarians generally get economic issues, but they do not have a consistent view of the use of force. I suppose they are perfectly consistent if they are genuine ancaps, but really very few of them are, and that kind of Rothbardian view of humanity is pure fantasy, just as deluded as Marx but with some economic literacy thrown in the mix to dazzle and confuse people.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 11:04:00 UTC
-
“Libertarians generally get economic issues, but they do not have a consistent v
—“Libertarians generally get economic issues, but they do not have a consistent view of the use of force. I suppose they are perfectly consistent if they are genuine ancaps, but really very few of them are, and that kind of Rothbardian view of humanity is pure fantasy, just as deluded as Marx but with some economic literacy thrown in the mix to dazzle and confuse people”— Daniel Jordan
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 11:04:00 UTC
-
TALEB, WOMEN, AND THE CATHEDRAL Taleb’s early books are an effort to feed his eg
TALEB, WOMEN, AND THE CATHEDRAL
Taleb’s early books are an effort to feed his ego (self image)
His later works are an effort to defend his ego (self image). He made a career popularizing mandelbrot.
He DID successfully restore ‘whatever doesn’t kill you only serves to make you stronger” as anti-fragility to the popular will but was unsuccessful in turning it into political policy or mandate – because it is contrary to female instinct and females control both the vote, consumer spending, the academy revenues.
So females control the cathedral complex: state, academy, advertising, marketing, consumption, and males control military, finance, and production which services them. Which has led to this problem.
As I remind us constantly – everything is institutions and incentives, and incentives always boil down to reproductive strategy, from which the rest of life is merely an exaggerated representation.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 10:59:00 UTC
-
Do you mean college debt and the financial system as two different things or did
Do you mean college debt and the financial system as two different things or did you mean something else?
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 00:45:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180282754556157952
Reply addressees: @ClownBa73413423
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180282435193446401
IN REPLY TO:
@FullAccountant
@curtdoolittle Can you do a formal post about the college/financial rent seeking you were trying to articulate in that John Mark video? I don’t think I fully grasped it and cannot find similar writings of you discussing it.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180282435193446401