Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • The Doolittle Policy Spreads: Quality.

    —“And, as I have adopted the Curt Doolittle high quality policy of blocking people who lie, slander, and refuse to stay on topic and debate with facts, you are blocked.”— Al Freeman
  • The Doolittle Policy Spreads: Quality.

    —“And, as I have adopted the Curt Doolittle high quality policy of blocking people who lie, slander, and refuse to stay on topic and debate with facts, you are blocked.”— Al Freeman
  • THE DOOLITTLE POLICY SPREADS: QUALITY. —“And, as I have adopted the Curt Dooli

    THE DOOLITTLE POLICY SPREADS: QUALITY.

    —“And, as I have adopted the Curt Doolittle high quality policy of blocking people who lie, slander, and refuse to stay on topic and debate with facts, you are blocked.”— Al Freeman


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-27 11:22:00 UTC

  • You sometimes speak of jews having “inverted sexual dimorphisms”. Could you elab

    You sometimes speak of jews having “inverted sexual dimorphisms”. Could you elaborate on that or maybe provide some sources? From my experience it’s certainly fair to say that jews have reduced sexual dimorphisms, e.g. jewish women are more assertive than aryan women, but not more assertive than jewish men. On a scale of manliness it might look like that: |—-W—-M—-| …for jews |–W——–M–| …for aryans So the span is smaller but (as I see it) not inverted. Another possible source of variation is translation: |—W—-M—–| …for jews |–W——–M–| …for aryans The span probably affects sex relations. A less submissive woman probably means more infighting. On a social scale that might explain the rise of feminism after emancipation (jewesses rebelling against gentile males unable to handle them).
  • You sometimes speak of jews having “inverted sexual dimorphisms”. Could you elab

    You sometimes speak of jews having “inverted sexual dimorphisms”. Could you elaborate on that or maybe provide some sources? From my experience it’s certainly fair to say that jews have reduced sexual dimorphisms, e.g. jewish women are more assertive than aryan women, but not more assertive than jewish men. On a scale of manliness it might look like that: |—-W—-M—-| …for jews |–W——–M–| …for aryans So the span is smaller but (as I see it) not inverted. Another possible source of variation is translation: |—W—-M—–| …for jews |–W——–M–| …for aryans The span probably affects sex relations. A less submissive woman probably means more infighting. On a social scale that might explain the rise of feminism after emancipation (jewesses rebelling against gentile males unable to handle them).
  • Curt Doolittle have you come across any decent studies of language which accurat

    Curt Doolittle have you come across any decent studies of language which accurately report the early adopters of written language, and actually convey the comprehensive affect on the winners; and rise of subsequent competitors and that impact? What does such a back and forth look like? Winners, losers. All societies logically connected to this story imo, and I suspect there might remain a few untold lessons or affirmations to be gleamed. Vindication for right argumentation could be a benefit, as well. Which would offer even less wiggle room for false arguments. 🙂
  • Seriously. Ask the lifetime warriors. Hunting humanoids is lotsa fun. The proble

    Seriously. Ask the lifetime warriors. Hunting humanoids is lotsa fun. The problem is, getting a permit is very difficult.
  • Seriously. Ask the lifetime warriors. Hunting humanoids is lotsa fun. The proble

    Seriously. Ask the lifetime warriors. Hunting humanoids is lotsa fun. The problem is, getting a permit is very difficult.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-25 16:30:00 UTC

  • Seriously. Ask the lifetime warriors. Hunting humanoids is lotsa fun. The proble

    Seriously. Ask the lifetime warriors. Hunting humanoids is lotsa fun. The problem is, getting a permit is very difficult.
  • “So the military has a choice: engage in extraction, or protect the capitalists

    —“So the military has a choice: engage in extraction, or protect the capitalists ability to engage in fraud, or protect the court’s ability to administer natural law.”–Zachary Miller A militia has no choice but the court. An Army has the choice of the first two. An empire has only the first.