Curt Doolittle

Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • “PROPERTARIANISM IS THE WORST CULT I’VE EVER SEEN” by Stephen Thomas Propertaria

    “PROPERTARIANISM IS THE WORST CULT I’VE EVER SEEN”

    by Stephen Thomas

    Propertarianism is the worst cult I have ever seen.

    There are no financial requirements.

    There are no social requirements.

    There are no official leaders.

    There are only 2 things required to “join”.

    Honesty

    Intelligence

    Honest people don’t engage in RRGSM unless provoked by dishonesty or RRGSM.

    Intelligent people can learn the excruciatingly difficult, monetarily free material.

    I don’t know of any cults intentionally pursing honest and intelligent people. Seems counterintuitive.

    —“We’re the cult of non submission completed.”—Alain Dwight

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 11:00:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/81889801_178569603541201_55313853571

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/81889801_178569603541201_5531385357137870848_o_178569596874535.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/82546247_178569556874539_5339151764954284032_o_178569550207873.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/81981537_178569523541209_5885099330125168640_o_178569520207876.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/81536112_178569536874541_4710918424597889024_o_178569530207875.jpg GREAT INFOGRAPHICS

    https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/pie2019.html

    77 percent rearrested within five years.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-04 10:16:00 UTC

  • I have no idea why this book has no reviews when economists recommend it so freq

    https://www.amazon.com/Best-Karl-Marx/dp/1630691844/(review)

    I have no idea why this book has no reviews when economists recommend it so frequently. The author’s introduction alone summarizes the argument against Marx and his entire body of work: it’s based upon false premises that were exposed by the Marginalists before he died, and the reason Marx having read them, never finished his works – he just kept taking money from Engels under the promise he would. Marx was the most influential of the Jewish Pseudoscientists: Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Bohr, Adorno, Fromm et al, Friedan et all, Derrida et al, Rand and Rothbard et al;. But it has taken a century to falsify each, leaving only Bohr surviving, and only Bohr (and in part Einstein) surviving past 2010, with current mathematics and physics still lost in mathematical sophistry – and few others, mostly in computer science ( Wolfram ) and molecular biology and genetics plugging away while physics spins.

    https://www.amazon.com/Best-Karl-Marx/dp/1630691844/Updated Jan 2, 2020, 7:33 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-02 19:33:00 UTC

  • “I seem to be very good at bringing cognitively feminine people to multiple RRGS

    —“I seem to be very good at bringing cognitively feminine people to multiple RRGSMs.”— Martin ล tฤ›pรกn

    Propertarian Quote of the day.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-02 19:17:00 UTC

  • OF DEFEATING LIBERAL LIES, ON LIES, AND MORE LIES Jan 1, 2020, 11:47 AM

    https://www.aier.org/article/fact-checking-the-1619-project-and-its-critics/COST OF DEFEATING LIBERAL LIES, ON LIES, AND MORE LIES

    https://www.aier.org/article/fact-checking-the-1619-project-and-its-critics/Updated Jan 1, 2020, 11:47 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-01 11:47:00 UTC

  • YEAR THOUGHTS ON RAMZPAUL’S PREDICTIONS PLS? Dec 31, 2019, 11:22 PM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfMdrMFPoi8NEW YEAR THOUGHTS ON RAMZPAUL’S PREDICTIONS PLS?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfMdrMFPoi8Updated Dec 31, 2019, 11:22 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-31 23:22:00 UTC

  • P is Difficult? Understanding is overrated. Soldiers do their duty. Man up. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    P is Difficult?

    Understanding is overrated.

    Soldiers do their duty.

    Man up. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-31 09:22:00 UTC

  • “Curt Doolittle is a moron…. Because is talks nonsense, its just waffle which

    —“Curt Doolittle is a moron…. Because is talks nonsense, its just waffle which doesn’t link together. He compared himself to Aristotle in reply to a comment I made on one of his videos. He isn’t very smart and can’t make higher connections to the true. He is similar to Jordan B Peterson or Ben Shapiru…. Because he thinks he has done some genius work by converting political language and idea’s into scientific language, which just makes political stuff much more complex than it actually is. What he’s doing is looking at a cream wall and trying to find the flecks of white in it. Its utterly pointless.”—William Walker

    lol….

    Answer a question: by what system of rules are governments – the largest organizations in the world – operated? (law) What differs between those organization (the body of laws and the limits upon them). By what other means is it possible for them to be operated? (none). Law is the operating system for governments. And if you had sufficient worldly knowledge and experience, you would know that.

    Logistics in war, Law in State, Contract in Commerce, Protocols in Medicine, Norm in commons, Tradition in Family.

    It’s ok if you’re only fit for the soldiery. You don’t need to understand. You either need to fight for your people or stay out of the way.

    As for understanding the work, well, you know, stupidities such as “Calculus is hard so it mustn’t be useful or true” apply to Propertarianism. It’s hard. Its useful. And it’s true. You don’t understand the constitution or the law either. Yet you think you do and you live by the rules put in place by the vast body of the common law, the constitution, the amendements, the findings of the court, the federal code, the state codes, and the regulations that make them possible.

    You don’t understand quantum mechanics and you still can use a cell phone, a computer, the internet, and satellite GPS systems.

    Understanding is overrated.

    Soldiers do their duty.

    That’s why we win.

    Man up.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-31 09:13:00 UTC

  • (from elsewhere) Thank you brother for the honest question. I understand that wh

    (from elsewhere)

    Thank you brother for the honest question.

    I understand that when one cannot comprehend the truth or falsehood of a set of ideas that one must trust that the man who utters them *does* comprehend them – and relays them with his warranty of due diligence in both the truth of the content, and the meaning he conveys when relaying it.

    My position is that I don’t want you to trust me, since truth should stand on its own. The problem then, is overcoming the barrier of complexity.

    There are a lot of you who want me to sound like a preacher selling a moral parable. There are others of you who want me to sound like a politician selling an ideology. There are others of you who want me to sound like a general inspiring the troops. But I am a judge rendering judgements in the law of nature and the natural law of men.

    So we are in a difficult position of you (all of you) one way or another, demanding some impossible test of character.

    Yet the only test is this: why would a man of accomplishment sacrifice everything in his life: time, wealth, business, family, relationships, and risk ostracization, punishment, imprisonment, and even death, to write down in law for the first time a scientific understanding of his people’s strategy, history, in recipe form, to give them moral license, a set of demands, a means of transition, and a plan of execution of a revolution – in order to save them from the second dark age that threatens this time to not only enslave them but to exterminate them?

    Who else would pay that cost but one who was devoted to it? Do you have any idea what I have given up to do this? I’ve bet my entire life that I can give mission to a revolution that restores my people to their historical path, and defeats the enemy forever.

    If you can’t comprehend my words. You can’t sympathize with my thoughts. You can’t empathize with my feelings, you can at least take the evidence of my incentives.

    We must win. I bet more than anyone else so far that I can make us win.

    You must only choose whether you trust your own judgement.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-30 21:12:00 UTC

  • Keep your ‘desperating’. lol

    Keep your ‘desperating’. lol

    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-30 15:35:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1211672177566724096

    Reply addressees: @AreRadical @TheCelticOrder

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1211671801274736640

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable โ€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1211671801274736640