Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • @RedPilledWorld @voxday The only reason to follow Vox is to increase the number

    @RedPilledWorld@voxday

    The only reason to follow Vox is to increase the number of morons who self-select out of responsibility for cognitive agency. Between Vox, Nick, Fuentes, and the handful of other morons, the right is self selecting into various specializations in the spectrum of losership. Moths to flames of ignorance, stupidity, reproductive infertility, political infertility, genetic and cultural replacement.

    Truth is a competitive advanage. The enemy’s competitive advantage is lying. The right cannot compete with the lef’ts competitive advantage in lying. The right cannot also resist the left’s baiting the right into defeat in a competition for who can lie deny and undermine the bset. And so most of these right wingers are just bad liars assisting in the distraction of the morons from any possibility of organized victory.

    Natural selection is at work.
    And the feminine left is winning.
    Overwhelmingly.

    As far as I can tell the ethnocentric national socialists are the only competent popele in the field but by associating with uncle adolph and the swasticka instead of simply advocating for similar policies and poltical secession they disallow themselves the field of political opportunity.

    All the christians are exactly what the rest of the world thinks of them: infantilized drug addicts on the opium of socially constructed ignorance.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 23:27:53 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764965251254960

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764768384038667


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    @RedPilledWorld @voxday Oh. I know Vox’s “Math” and as an explanation: non correlation without explaining causation. Now, the means of falsifying this particular argument is relatively simple and someone has already done so in this thread. For example, there are about 100M neural columns in your head. They manage to predict and iteratively test and re-predict a model of the world within a few milliseconds. This EVOLUTION of disorder into order you call perception is possible because those 100M neural colums work in PARALLEL. And they do so by adversarial competition for prediction over time. And those columns that correctly predict contain neurons that get fed for that correct prediction. Now, evolution works the same way. In massive parallel and variation and hybridization and variation and speciation and so on. So the (moronic) oversight of such calculations as vox has stated is presuming that taking an average rate of mutation in a stable life form that by its stability limits mutations is sufficient to statistically represent the wide variety of rates of mutation, the wide variety of selection criteria, and the massive parallelism that occurs as this wide range of potentials compete. Now, of course, the correct answer is that because evolution (evolutionary computation) is the function (first principle) of the universe, and because of the absolutely stupid-simple method of computation by which the universe computes increase in the capture of energy as existence – a stable relation, that anything that can be computed will be computed. And the rate of computation is simply the set of methods of evolutionary computation, the rate of trial and error, the rate and number of regulatory processes, the complexity of the exchange between the cellular biochemistry and the production of molecules, the rate of reproduction, the degree of parallelization, the number and frequency of speciation and recombination, the division of responsibility between cells, organisms, and complex organisms, and the chaos of the selection criteria produced by the environment, resources and competitors. Not how few of those factors are present in the ‘moron math’ of vox day. And how easily you morons are fooled by a basic incomprehension of basic statistics. The big ‘oops’ for example is the capture of mitochondria by one cell that tried to eat another cell. This allowed cells to divide by providing external resources of energy production, and the nucleus to divide the genetic material without increasing genetic mass, and without accounting for energy production. This ‘oops’ is not the only ‘oops’ that appears to have happened. SIMPLE MATH VERSION Any math that ends in infinities is false. Any math that is non-correspondent is false. Any math that cannot provide an operational construction is false. Because all of these failures are evidence of a failure to account for variables – what we call ‘hidden variables’. Vox’s math (which isn’t his by the way), is false.

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764768384038667

  • @Jason_the_Gentleman @no_slunk @veraticus @voxday Again, 1) This is a convenient

    @Jason_the_Gentleman@no_slunk@veraticus@voxday

    Again,

    1) This is a convenient trope.
    2) You can create a lie
    3) You can be a carrier of a lie
    4) You can distribute a lie
    5) You can prmote a lie

    Now,
    1) in criminal law we generally require intent.
    2) In Tort Law we only require responsibility to demand restitution.
    3) In Tort law we only require a failure of due diligence to demand punishment in addition to restitution.

    Now
    you have an incentive to lie,
    you have an incentive to collect an inventory of lies as a carrier of lies.
    You have engaged in the distribution of the lie.
    And by arguing you have attempted to promote the lie.

    Now since we are speaking of a matter of the commons -meaning truth claims in pubilc about matters public, but
    1) have failed due diligence,
    2) actied with intent,
    then
    3) it doesn’t matter if you intend to lie or not,
    4) you distributed a lie for the purpose of self interest against the public interst, because the only public interst is truth.

    The reason for our laws is to ensure that you cannot profit from fraud even if that profit is just to preserve your self image, status, alliances, and the social construction of the fraud you share – a conspiracy of common interest.

    So, Accused, Argued, Convicted, and submitted for Sentencing for Responsibiilty, Restitution, and Punishment.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 22:47:06 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764804906756311

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle @Blooo12901107 In our dysfunctionally dependen

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle @Blooo12901107 In our dysfunctionally dependent society β€œcare” requires you constantly be aware whether o…


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 22:08:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491172032826179584

  • I’m not that smart. lolz

    I’m not that smart. lolz


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 20:29:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491147150495219712

    Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491143370345172992

  • yeah well you shoulda said that up front so I clued in. Otherwise I’m like “WTF

    yeah well you shoulda said that up front so I clued in. Otherwise I’m like “WTF are you spamming me with this for??? “lol


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 20:28:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491147059122307073

    Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491143370345172992

  • @xxxlrx @voxday @JFGariepy (FWIW: I use the ‘smart’ tactic as bait. It causes se

    @xxxlrx@voxday@JFGariepy (FWIW: I use the ‘smart’ tactic as bait. It causes self defensive and moral outrage in the opposition, and its from a position of moral outrage we are most likely to state our truthful intuitions. This is why I rely on the king of the hill (adversarial) method of research on social media. It’s also why people tend to think I’m holding a position that I don’t, I”m just investigating by running tests – and it’s mostly why people (somewhat justifiably)come to hate me. πŸ˜‰ )


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 20:20:56 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764230133421239

  • @xxxlrx @voxday @JFGariepy Not sure who you’re talking to. I called in to suppor

    @xxxlrx@voxday@JFGariepy

    Not sure who you’re talking to.

    I called in to support JFG’s book by crash reading it the day it was released, in order to support him because I’m a fan. I’ve had one back and forth with him on the subject (at least that I recall) becuase we misunderstood each other. I had interpreting him making a general observation to educate the public and I think his theory is that is operational (it’s exactly what happend). Which means that I misunderstood him. I pretty much don’t disagree with JFG except when we talk past each other. And that’s becasue I have to determine what’s decidable in court by decidable means. And JFG is more often in the philosophical (and skeptical) tradition of deciding what is useful, beneficial or good. This is a difference in framing that causes talking past one another. it’s not a disagreement.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 20:18:42 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764221349527400

  • @RenegadeScoutr @Snidely_Whiplash @voxday You just lied again by 1) equating dev

    @RenegadeScoutr@Snidely_Whiplash@voxday You just lied again by

    1) equating devotion (religion) to trust (science)
    Faith (religion) > Belief (Philosohy) > Trust (Action (economics, law))

    2) equating science(testifiable) to a faith(specifically because its untestifiable)

    3) equating the absence of trust in the untestifiable (science) with faith(religion) in the untestifiable specifically because it is untestifiable.

    4) science consists of the application of testimony outside of the field of its origin in the law. In the adversarial marketplace to falsify competing statements, that which survives falsification is the truth candidate. This is not true of faith (social construction of a falsehood). Instead, that which is desirable survives and propagates. Not because it is true – but because it is false and desirable. Why? We only need to know what is true in order to resolve conflicts. We can invent truth, falshood, fraud, and deceit in order to coerce others in to giving us what we want.

    This is why abrahamic religoin spreads: its a lie simple people want to be true. Because it means they are good by social constuction not by the evience of their actions in life.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 20:11:13 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764191934489504

  • @xevious2030 I don’t know you so I’m not really sure which argument you’re tryin

    @xevious2030 I don’t know you so I’m not really sure which argument you’re trying to make. But (a) if you can’t make the argument you don’t understand it yourself. (b) I can make every single argument whose assertion I offer. (c) As is noted in most of the journals the primary problem with the failure of most modern scientific publications is a lack of understanding of statistics, or the evolutionary conditions under which any evolutionary process competes. (we call this a failure of full accounting).

    a) the first article says nothing related to the topic
    b) the second article seeks to demonstrate the rate of reproduction but does not include the rate of genetic variation, or the conditions of selection
    c) the third article uses ecoli to illustrate that in a healthy long-surviving single-cell organism, the mutation rate is constant, and most surviving mutations are beneficial. In other words, the purpose of the article is to express how much work we have to do to understand how cells process information such that harmful mutations rarely succeed (and unlike cancer cells, don’t hyper-reproduce destroying the colony of cells).
    d) the fourth article states the obvious that every time we refine our measurements we discover that there are more bacteria living under more conditions in more niches than we had estimated – fulfilling the theory that ‘bacteria are the most durable adaptive and successful form of life’.

    CONCLUSION
    So what you have tried to do, if I understand, is pretend that these articles are relevant to the discussion, that you possess sufficient konwledge to participate in such a discussion, and that you possess sufficient knowledge to hold an opinion, and that your opinion has any merit.

    And in doing so you have confirmed my accusation that Abrahamic religions and that you are employing the female strategy of deception by claiming your disapproval is equal to falsification, then lying denying and socially constructing a falsehood to obscure your equation of approval with truth, the pretense of knowledge, competency, merit (ie: lying).

    So yes. You just proved again that I was right on my accusation that Abrahamic religions teach you to lie. using the female method of deception that was institutionalized – not as reason, science, technology, economics, and law as in the west, but as supernatural deceit in the middle east.

    You know. (a) it’s very unlikely you (or anyone else for that matter) will approach being smarter than I am in such matters. Largely because my work has resulted in a certain level of skill in lie detection that is unique. (b) and because I’m quite careful about the difference between decidability, undecidability, opinion, and trash talking for amusement. (c) it is however possible to know something I don’t – but then you’d have to demonstrate it. And by your actions you’ve demonstrated that you’re that category of person who neither possesses such knowledge nor would be able to employ it.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 20:05:12 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764168282988316

  • Unfortunatley I didn’t get that this was your intention. Now I underestand. lol.

    Unfortunatley I didn’t get that this was your intention. Now I underestand. lol… sorrry…. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 19:46:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491136459608567809

    Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491132602031669249