Curt Doolittle

Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • MORITZ BIERLING ON ‘THE ONLY SCALABLE SOLUTION’. —“The Western peoples transfe

    MORITZ BIERLING ON ‘THE ONLY SCALABLE SOLUTION’.

    —“The Western peoples transferred, or rather limited, the universal drive to find and exploit high yield, low investment, low maintenance sources of energy from other people (“parasitism”) to immediately and personally moveable resources including your own body and everything it produces (“industry”). Turns out that’s the only scalable solution.”—Moritz Bierling

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 11:23:00 UTC

  • In each great transformational era we cast off the errors, justifications, and l

    In each great transformational era we cast off the errors, justifications, and lies of the prior. And in doing so produce waves of retaliation by new errors, justifications and lies by those who benefitted from the former, or find opportunity in the newer.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-17 09:31:00 UTC

  • Is Male Bonding The Source Of Civilization?

    (hmmm… well, lets do a propertarian analysis of that question)—“How do you feel about mannerbunds?”—Harrison Baker

    Well you know, I tend to stay away from silly terminology and instead make operationally testable statements. men evolved to work in groups of brothers to herd women, hold territory, and kill competitors and take their stuff. this requires both cooperation: shared risk, and loyalty: elimination of defectors and parasites, and a division of spoils preserving both cooperation, loyalty, and the punishment of defectors and cheats. civilization is the result of teh accumulated knowledge and institutions that allow us to scale this system to ever larger and ever more competitive circumstances. in this sense, yes, the bond between men that we traditionally call the ‘intitiatic brotherhood of soldiers’ is in fact, the source of what we call ‘civilization’: cooperation at very large scales. But we could just as likely say that it’s the need for men to bind to herd women and hold territory and develop institutions that is the source of civilization. or we could say that it is man’s reaction to the untrustworthiness of women that is the origin of civilization since all we do is invent better farms in which to herd our women at lower cost to us. Or we could say that women are untrustworthy in order to force us to build good farms (nests) for them in which they can nest. And that it is women’s untrustworthiness that forces us to cooperate and create nesting areas for them. Roll that little model around in your head for a while? 😉 Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Is Male Bonding The Source Of Civilization?

    (hmmm… well, lets do a propertarian analysis of that question)—“How do you feel about mannerbunds?”—Harrison Baker

    Well you know, I tend to stay away from silly terminology and instead make operationally testable statements. men evolved to work in groups of brothers to herd women, hold territory, and kill competitors and take their stuff. this requires both cooperation: shared risk, and loyalty: elimination of defectors and parasites, and a division of spoils preserving both cooperation, loyalty, and the punishment of defectors and cheats. civilization is the result of teh accumulated knowledge and institutions that allow us to scale this system to ever larger and ever more competitive circumstances. in this sense, yes, the bond between men that we traditionally call the ‘intitiatic brotherhood of soldiers’ is in fact, the source of what we call ‘civilization’: cooperation at very large scales. But we could just as likely say that it’s the need for men to bind to herd women and hold territory and develop institutions that is the source of civilization. or we could say that it is man’s reaction to the untrustworthiness of women that is the origin of civilization since all we do is invent better farms in which to herd our women at lower cost to us. Or we could say that women are untrustworthy in order to force us to build good farms (nests) for them in which they can nest. And that it is women’s untrustworthiness that forces us to cooperate and create nesting areas for them. Roll that little model around in your head for a while? 😉 Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • “If people trusted their senses it would be obvious to everyone that almost ever

    —“If people trusted their senses it would be obvious to everyone that almost every big American city is not an aristocrats garden, but more like a labor camp.”—Brian Barr

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 12:19:00 UTC

  • IS MALE BONDING THE SOURCE OF CIVILIZATION? (hmmm… well, lets do a propertaria

    IS MALE BONDING THE SOURCE OF CIVILIZATION?

    (hmmm… well, lets do a propertarian analysis of that question)

    —“How do you feel about mannerbunds?”—Harrison Baker

    Well you know, I tend to stay away from silly terminology and instead make operationally testable statements.

    men evolved to work in groups of brothers to herd women, hold territory, and kill competitors and take their stuff.

    this requires both cooperation: shared risk, and loyalty: elimination of defectors and parasites, and a division of spoils preserving both cooperation, loyalty, and the punishment of defectors and cheats.

    civilization is the result of teh accumulated knowledge and institutions that allow us to scale this system to ever larger and ever more competitive circumstances.

    in this sense, yes, the bond between men that we traditionally call the ‘intitiatic brotherhood of soldiers’ is in fact the source of what we call ‘civilization;: cooperation at very large scales.

    But we could just as likely say that it’s the need for men to bind to herd women and hold territory and develop institutions that is the source of civilization.

    or we could say that it is man’s reaction to the untrustworthiness of women that is the origin of civilization since all we do is invent better farms in which to herd our women at lower cost to us.

    Or we could say that women are untrustworthy in order to force us to build good farms (nests) for them in which they can nest. And that it is women’s untrustworthiness that forces us to cooperate and create nesting areas for them.

    Roll that little model around in your head for a while? 😉

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 10:19:00 UTC

  • Neither statement is scientific, objectively moral, or necessarily true. There i

    Neither statement is scientific, objectively moral, or necessarily true. There is no higher order than kin.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 20:56:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798630666384486401

    Reply addressees: @dallasosa @SpeakerRyan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798628166512283649

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798628166512283649

  • An urban minority is not the same as a demographic or territorial minority. Outs

    An urban minority is not the same as a demographic or territorial minority. Outside of the urban favelas-in-training, it’s homogenous.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 19:00:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/798601621240475648

  • Yes we killed all the natives. We are hella good at killing. Are you sure you wa

    Yes we killed all the natives. We are hella good at killing. Are you sure you wanna take this to the wall?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 18:47:00 UTC

  • Intellectual History In A Nutshell

    0) THE BIRTH OF THE WEST: SOVEREIGNTY. COUNTER-REVOLUTIONS 1) RELIGION: THE FIRST INFANTILIZATION OF THE INDO-EUROPEANS. (corrected with aristotelian reason, stoic and roman law)

    2) CHRISTIANITY: THE FIRST INFANTILIZATION OF THE WESTERN INDO-EUROPEANS (corrected with empiricism, and anglo common law) 3) COSMOPOLITANISM: THE SECOND INFANTILIZATION OF THE WEST. AND THE NEW WEST. (corrected with testimonialism, and propertarian natural law) WHY IS IT WE MUST DE-INFANTILIZE MAN IN EVERY GREAT ERA?