Curt Doolittle

Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • Intellectual History In A Nutshell

    0) THE BIRTH OF THE WEST: SOVEREIGNTY. COUNTER-REVOLUTIONS 1) RELIGION: THE FIRST INFANTILIZATION OF THE INDO-EUROPEANS. (corrected with aristotelian reason, stoic and roman law)

    2) CHRISTIANITY: THE FIRST INFANTILIZATION OF THE WESTERN INDO-EUROPEANS (corrected with empiricism, and anglo common law) 3) COSMOPOLITANISM: THE SECOND INFANTILIZATION OF THE WEST. AND THE NEW WEST. (corrected with testimonialism, and propertarian natural law) WHY IS IT WE MUST DE-INFANTILIZE MAN IN EVERY GREAT ERA?

  • The Western Transcendent Series

    1) SOVEREIGNTY (leads to) 2) MARKETS IN EVERYTHING, (leads to) 3) DEFLATIONARY/DECONFLATIONARY, (leads to) 4) REASON, RATIONALISM, EMPIRICISM, TESTIMONIALISM (leads to) 5) TRUTH: PERFECT PARSIMONY (leads to) 6) TRANSCENDENCE.

  • The Western Transcendent Series

    1) SOVEREIGNTY (leads to) 2) MARKETS IN EVERYTHING, (leads to) 3) DEFLATIONARY/DECONFLATIONARY, (leads to) 4) REASON, RATIONALISM, EMPIRICISM, TESTIMONIALISM (leads to) 5) TRUTH: PERFECT PARSIMONY (leads to) 6) TRANSCENDENCE.

  • An urban minority is not the same as a demographic or territorial minority. Outs

    An urban minority is not the same as a demographic or territorial minority. Outside of the urban favelas-in-training, it’s homogenous.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 14:00:00 UTC

  • WILL YOU SURRENDER YOUR CIVILIZATION TO ANOTHER DARK AGE OF THOSE-WHO-INVENT-LIE

    WILL YOU SURRENDER YOUR CIVILIZATION TO ANOTHER DARK AGE OF THOSE-WHO-INVENT-LIES?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 10:29:00 UTC

  • 0) THE BIRTH OF THE WEST: SOVEREIGNTY. COUNTER-REVOLUTIONS 1) RELIGION: THE FIRS

    0) THE BIRTH OF THE WEST: SOVEREIGNTY.

    COUNTER-REVOLUTIONS

    1) RELIGION: THE FIRST INFANTILIZATION OF THE INDO-EUROPEANS.

    (corrected with aristotelian reason, stoic and roman law)

    2) CHRISTIANITY: THE FIRST INFANTILIZATION OF THE WESTERN INDO-EUROPEANS

    (corrected with empiricism, and anglo common law)

    3) COSMOPOLITANISM: THE SECOND INFANTILIZATION OF THE WEST. AND THE NEW WEST.

    (corrected with testimonialism, and propertarian natural law)

    WHY IS IT WE MUST DE-INFANTILIZE MAN IN EVERY GREAT ERA?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 08:51:00 UTC

  • Definitions of Relations

    EMPLOYEE Responsible for own provision of room and board and care from the product of one’s wages.

    FARMER Holds sufficient land and labor to produce goods not only for consumption but for sale in the market, as personal property. PEASANT Holds a small plot of land farmed by the family, for family consumption, as family property (this is an important distinction) – one does not have control over the property – the family does.. SERF Holds access to a portion of land for family in exchange for a combination of labor on the manor’s holdings, in addition to some percentage of his personal production. And is bound to the land, having little or no right of exit except under certain conditions. INDENTURED SERVITUDE Receives room and board, and possible small spending money, in exchange for labor. But loses right of exit. SLAVE Bound to the land, manor, and or family, providing room board and clothing, but holds no title or rent, and no discretion. slavery as we understand it is an historical fabrication. one could be everything from the equivalent of a full-time household employee treated as a cherished member of the family, to a farm hand, to a disposable laborer, to a prisoner with no chance of survival working in the mines. PRISONER (SLAVE) terrible conditions which you might not be expected to survive, under hard labor, as a form of punishment.

  • Definitions of Relations

    EMPLOYEE Responsible for own provision of room and board and care from the product of one’s wages.

    FARMER Holds sufficient land and labor to produce goods not only for consumption but for sale in the market, as personal property. PEASANT Holds a small plot of land farmed by the family, for family consumption, as family property (this is an important distinction) – one does not have control over the property – the family does.. SERF Holds access to a portion of land for family in exchange for a combination of labor on the manor’s holdings, in addition to some percentage of his personal production. And is bound to the land, having little or no right of exit except under certain conditions. INDENTURED SERVITUDE Receives room and board, and possible small spending money, in exchange for labor. But loses right of exit. SLAVE Bound to the land, manor, and or family, providing room board and clothing, but holds no title or rent, and no discretion. slavery as we understand it is an historical fabrication. one could be everything from the equivalent of a full-time household employee treated as a cherished member of the family, to a farm hand, to a disposable laborer, to a prisoner with no chance of survival working in the mines. PRISONER (SLAVE) terrible conditions which you might not be expected to survive, under hard labor, as a form of punishment.

  • The Three Orders: Kin, Cult, State

    I would say that the Cathedral Complex (state, academy, media) are all engaged in customer seeking – an incrementalist form of rent seeking. They profit from the building of customers and rents. The interesting question not discussed is that because we humans make use of law, religion, and market, but we choose a dominant bias with which to employ them in our social orders, yielding:

    (1)kin/law, (2)cult/religion, or (3)state/corporatism; depending upon homogeneity or heterogeneity of the population; to overcome resistance to the creation and preservation of commons – so that why is it that one bias in the order is always better off than the others? And why does not social-criticism and intellectual-decidability limit itself to the order desired by the population? of course, we know the answer is genetic in both desire for construct, and in the expression of that desire for construct as a will to power. I frequently ask the same question: why do economists vary in bias of decidability? for the same reason: austrian-social-science and rule of law preserving sovereignty, freshwater limits of rule of law as a commons against harm, and saltwater abandonment of rule of law in favor of preferential discretion in order to acquire customers for the state. If it isn’t clear to you, then the answer is this: anything other than kin/law is nothing more than an act of war by slower means. We have been at war. We are at war. Time to win the war.

  • The Three Orders: Kin, Cult, State

    I would say that the Cathedral Complex (state, academy, media) are all engaged in customer seeking – an incrementalist form of rent seeking. They profit from the building of customers and rents. The interesting question not discussed is that because we humans make use of law, religion, and market, but we choose a dominant bias with which to employ them in our social orders, yielding:

    (1)kin/law, (2)cult/religion, or (3)state/corporatism; depending upon homogeneity or heterogeneity of the population; to overcome resistance to the creation and preservation of commons – so that why is it that one bias in the order is always better off than the others? And why does not social-criticism and intellectual-decidability limit itself to the order desired by the population? of course, we know the answer is genetic in both desire for construct, and in the expression of that desire for construct as a will to power. I frequently ask the same question: why do economists vary in bias of decidability? for the same reason: austrian-social-science and rule of law preserving sovereignty, freshwater limits of rule of law as a commons against harm, and saltwater abandonment of rule of law in favor of preferential discretion in order to acquire customers for the state. If it isn’t clear to you, then the answer is this: anything other than kin/law is nothing more than an act of war by slower means. We have been at war. We are at war. Time to win the war.