Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • There remain exceptional artists today but they practice individual aesthetics n

    There remain exceptional artists today but they practice individual aesthetics not ‘team, national, or cultural’ values.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-22 22:47:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801195453886955520

    Reply addressees: @Graf_von_Dienen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801147178345435137


    IN REPLY TO:

    @von_dienstmann

    @curtdoolittle What is your opinion as an art scholar on contemporary and modernist art movements? (Pollock, Mondrian, impressionists, etc)

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801147178345435137

  • The purpose of the movements was to provide an underclass alternative to the wes

    The purpose of the movements was to provide an underclass alternative to the west’s narrative by appealing to base ‘feelz’.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-22 22:31:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801191381964308480

    Reply addressees: @Graf_von_Dienen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801147178345435137


    IN REPLY TO:

    @von_dienstmann

    @curtdoolittle What is your opinion as an art scholar on contemporary and modernist art movements? (Pollock, Mondrian, impressionists, etc)

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801147178345435137

  • Not sure why I had an epiphany tonight but history really is a battle between th

    Not sure why I had an epiphany tonight but history really is a battle between the dark lies and the light of truth, and we must end them forever – permanently – and without mercy, question, or hesitation.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-22 22:02:00 UTC

  • THE RESTORATION: THE SECRET OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION: PROPERTARIANISM IN A NUTSHE

    THE RESTORATION: THE SECRET OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION: PROPERTARIANISM IN A NUTSHELL

    (propertarianism core)

    We can restore the west’s evolutionary trajectory as the principle source of mankind’s innovation, restore our people and our civilization, and overthrow a century and a half of pseudoscience, by restoring to the common law the organizing principle of sovereignty – and consequential markets in everything, with just one law: truthful speech by the involuntary warranty of due diligence against error, bias, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience and deceit, for the purpose of circumventing a voluntary, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, limited to productive externalities, by the imposition of costs against property in toto: that broad spectrum of things, relationships, behaviors, and commons, which we have borne costs to inventory, without imposing costs upon the things, behaviors, and commons of others. This warranty is achieved by proofs (demonstrations) of consistency in 1) categorical consistency, 2) internal consistency, 3) empirical consistency, 4) existential consistency, 5) moral consistency, 6) scope consistency. And while it might take a small effort to learn how to provide these warranties on all information, just as we have learned to provide warranties on products, warranties on services, and limited warranties on the reporting of basic research, we can complete the scientific method and require these proofs on all information.

    In every era we invent new expansions of the method of cooperation we call the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy. But in doing so we create greater asymmetries of knowledge, and therefore new opportunities to invent means of benefitting from the imposition of costs upon others that we call ‘parasitism’. And we rely upon courts, testimony, jury, judge, empirical truth, and the accumulated empirical knowledge of the common law of torts, to incrementally suppress and render illegal each innovation in parasitism as soon as the first case adjudicated is recorded for reference by other lawyers, prosecutors, and judges.

    The west was not first, nor wealthiest, nor possessed of greater numbers, superior resources, superior climate. But instead, by accident of circumstance, chose Sovereignty as their principle of organization – a choice which is possible only under empirical, testimonial speech we call ‘truth’, and a market for the resolution of any negotiation, exchange, or conflict – depriving all of authority over anything other than the preservation of sovereignty. Europeans created the distributed dictatorship of sovereign men, open to any man willing and able to reciprocally insure every other against violations of his sovereignty.

    This choice resulted in a civilization that calculates advancements faster than all other organizing models, and produces the least opportunity for parasitism and rents. And it is this velocity in the ancient and modern worlds that has allowed the west to defeat the red queen of corruption, and drag mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, mysticism, justificationism, conflationism, deception, hunger, poverty, physical labor, cellular decay, disease, and increasingly, the vicissitudes of nature, in an unforgiving universe hostile to life in all but the rarest of exceptions.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-22 11:51:00 UTC

  • EUROPE BEFORE MUSLIM SLAVERY AND COLONIZATION

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_182282971&feature=iv&src_vid=c7y2LRcf4kc&v=qNdwekMcr2EEASTERN EUROPE BEFORE MUSLIM SLAVERY AND COLONIZATION


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-21 18:54:00 UTC

  • In 586 BCE, the forces of the Babylonian Empire conquered the Jews, destroying t

    In 586 BCE, the forces of the Babylonian Empire conquered the Jews, destroying their Temple and carrying off a proportion of the Jewish population into exile. The captives consisted especially of educated and upper-class people as well as the royal family. This “Babylonian captivity” lasted almost fifty years. In 539 BCE the Persians, under the leadership of the Achaemenid King Cyrus, conquered Babylon, and in 538 Cyrus issued a decree stating that the Jews would be allowed to return to their homeland. Not only were the Exiles released, but Cyrus, and to some extent his Achaemenid successors, also supported the rebuilding of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem. Cyrus’ policy was motivated not only by his religious tolerance (he also encouraged other, pagan peoples to maintain their own religions) but by statesmanlike wisdom; people treated generously are less likely to rebel.

    But not all the Jews wanted to go home. In the years of Exile, the adaptable Jewish people had established themselves in Mesopotamia, settling there and engaging in business and even politics. Many Jews, while remaining devout Jews, did not go back to their homeland. They carried on their lives in their new home, and as the Persian Empire consolidated its rule, some Jews even rose to high positions of service in the imperial court.

    It was during the end of the Exile, among the Jews now living in the Persian Empire, that the first significant contact was made between the Jewish and Iranian cultures. And it is evident in the Bible that Jewish thinking changed after the Exile. The question is then: are these changes the result of the cultural meeting of Jewish and Iranian thinkers, or are these changes due to the shock of Exile? During the Exile, Jews had to change not only how they worshipped, since they no longer had their temple or the animal sacrifices which had been at the center of their faith, but also how they thought about God. The Jewish concept of God as their tribal protector, who would save them from being conquered or exiled, had to undergo revision.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-21 13:08:00 UTC

  • (great paragraph from ch1) ***We teach history as the record of achievement and

    (great paragraph from ch1)

    ***We teach history as the record of achievement and invention, and this is all well and good. But when we teach history as the record of firsts, we rarely focus on the most important first: those who are fastest. Or the opposite: who are the slowest. Or worse, who declines and why. Most of human history consists of seeking opportunities at actionable human scale. However, in the current era, our greatest opportunities are those provided not by innovation, but the elimination of error, bias, wishful thinking, and deceit.***


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-21 11:53:00 UTC

  • AT THE PREVIOUS MUSLIM INVASIONS OF EUROPE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7y2LRcf4kcLOOK AT THE PREVIOUS MUSLIM INVASIONS OF EUROPE


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-20 14:59:00 UTC

  • CURT AND MURRAY SELL ON CULTURAL DIFFERENCES —“The Chinese [primary method of

    CURT AND MURRAY SELL ON CULTURAL DIFFERENCES

    —“The Chinese [primary method of decidability] is stability – [non-conflict]. Chinese history is tumultuous so everything must be done in the name of maintaining equilibrium and stability in the nation state(which is seen as a collective entity).

    The American [primary method of decidability] (until very recently) is reason – [negotiation]. Maintaining that people will ultimately do what’s right for themselves in the end and will act in their own self interests.

    (CURT INTERJECTS: Chinese prevent conflict through denial, delay, and deceit. westerners attempt to expose conflicts and resolve them quickly. europeans regulate heavily to prevent legal conflicts later. Americans provide very precise legal rules so that limited regulation is necessary except in those cases where the exceptions have failed. These are three methods of insurance against conflict. The Chinese delay and deceive and deny until ‘matters solve themselves’. The continental method of regulate in order to limit conflicts. And the anglo method: provide clear rule of law so that those conflicts that do arise are decidable.)

    It’s probably why our greatest weapon has been unleashing chaos into societies (weaponized culture)in order to drive events in a way that serve America’s greater interests.

    (CURT INTERJECTS: Americans have followed the anglo enlightenment, peace of Westphalia(States are responsible for all agents within), and Postwar Consensus (human rights and fixed borders), that the world will remain peaceful through economic cooperation rather than territorial expansion. So americans seek to raise in to ‘adulthood’ every nation, so that it can participate in a meritocratic international market. This is ok, except that every nation may not have the human capital to compete successfully, and may try to circumvent that meritocratic competition by other means (islam).)

    I feel like this idea failed with the Middle Eastern destabilization program of the obama administration. The realization that people are literally wired differently from the western mind I feel is a revelatory moment of catharsis for western neoliberal thinkers. Universalism is a generic lazy way of seeing collective groups of people on earth. I have watched lectures on YouTube from the army war college stating that it doesn’t really matter if we technically “lose” wars with other nation states (fail to hold territory). As long as we utterly destroy your nation and knock it back a century in its progress we have technically won against our opponent because they can’t develop a civilization strong enough to challenge us on our own territory. The third world is aware of this and some folks theorize that we are in a multigenerational asymmetric conflict with the devolving world using our own principles and mass migration (another form of warfare) against us…”— Murray Sell

    (CURT INTERJECTS: agreed)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-20 13:22:00 UTC

  • KIN, CLASS, CASTE: MODELS AND FUNCTIONS Kinship System (oligarchy)(small nation

    KIN, CLASS, CASTE: MODELS AND FUNCTIONS

    Kinship System (oligarchy)(small nation states),

    Class System (informal institution – markets) or

    Caste System (formal institution – religion and laws),

    exist universally in all nations, states, and empires. Without exception. It’s arguable the entire world operates as a caste system with whites arguably the minority aristocracy, followed by east Asians, then Hindus, then steppes, then Arabs, then the darker races. The data in every walk of life agrees with it. Just how it is.

    We see it in the patterns of relations in every walk of life. Why? because of (a) kin selection, (b) reproductive desirability, (c) commercial desirability (d) political desirability.

    kinship systems show the least diversity, class the next most diverse.

    Now, is a caste system superior or inferior to a class system? Well it depends upon the problems of managing the size of the underclass. The smaller the underclass the more useful kin and market orders. the larger the underclass the more useful the authoritarian and caste orders.

    All the warm climate states have the problem of the inability to reduce the relative size of the underclass and therefore create a voluntary organization of production using the proceeds of whatever they can produce. This means that any warm climate people unable to cull the lower classes will have permanent favelas and slums, and northern climes that eliminate lower classes will continue to prosper.

    There is a strange economics to the use of air conditioning.

    The hindus are … unnecessarily limited by the cast system and will do much better with the class system in the market order. However, it will mean (likely) degeneration into more Muslim frameworks more tolerable by leadership from the underclasses.

    Islam is suitable for rule of the ‘evil 80’s.’ Hinduism preserves the ability for a class to prevent expansion of rule by the evil 80’s.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 11:50:00 UTC