Hitler was a cuck.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-18 18:45:00 UTC
Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology
-
so tired of the peasantry. do they deserve to lose their civilization? Lose your
so tired of the peasantry. do they deserve to lose their civilization? Lose your aristocracy and you are nothing. everyone who does dies. is overwhelmed by the competing bottom.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-18 17:09:00 UTC
-
YES WE CAN RESTORE WESTERN CIVILIZATION – EASILY —“It appears that a golden bu
YES WE CAN RESTORE WESTERN CIVILIZATION – EASILY
—“It appears that a golden bullet would be to reduce the value of [false] advertising, and this ineffectiveness would lead to the media industry being starved of revenue. Any suggestions on how this could be achieved?”—- Julian le Roux
GREAT QUESTION!!!! YES!
EASILY:
(a) require testimonial truth in all public speech.
(b) rescind copyright protection, replacing it with creative commons protection. (you may not profit from it at civic expense, and then neither may anyone else.). This reduces copyright to a trademark and therefore fraud issue rather than a license for unnecessary and perversive rents.
Honestly, it’s that simple. We would crush the entertainment, advertising, media, propaganda, public intellectual, political in 120 days. That is all the cash flow that they have to survive with. Even the threat of it would wipe out the industry.
As we have seen with book authorship, artistic authorship, and even independent cinema, the creative works would continue to be produced no matter what. There is no reason to subsidize them if by doing so we subsidize the production of critique (propaganda).
The impact on civilization – reversing the economic incentives and economic possibility of engaging in the industrialization of lying, would vanish.
If intellectuals professors, advertisers and marketers, industry and politicians, media and artists must warranty their works as truthful, then the size, scale, and composition of the information system will return to that which is possible and rewarding: truthful.
We have built a civilization funded by lying just as much as we built the internet funded by pornography.
WE MADE IT POSSIBLE BY A GRATUITOUS VIOLATION OF NATURAL LAW. WE CAN UNMAKE THE POSSIBILITY BUT RESTORING NATURAL LAW.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-18 14:01:00 UTC
-
I’m only menacing to the underclass, and only to the under class of other tribes
I’m only menacing to the underclass, and only to the under class of other tribes – since my tribe’s underclass are my kin. If one finds me menacing, then this says only that one is himself a member of the underclass. 😉
(a rebuke)(from elsewhere)
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-17 08:41:00 UTC
-
“The patrician class that made up the officer corp of the Roman military, as wel
—“The patrician class that made up the officer corp of the Roman military, as well as the civilian leadership of their society during the Republican era lived in villas outside the city center.
They weren’t unlike knights who lived as small scale rural lords and had their station due to being able to maintain their accouterments, go on extended campaigns without financial ruin (because their wealth was based on ownership and not labor) and could provide additional soldiers from among the vassals in their patronage networks. Which is how Roman society was structured with patricians having a direct relationship with a particular constituency of plebs. Rome was not ruled by an “urban” population initially and it was noted by Romans themselves that their society had decayed when their ruling cohort became strictly urban and the patricians no longer had a direct connection to any particular constituency and whose wealth was self-perpetuating and non-generative.
The various Greek polis had many different systems and not all of them had an urbanized ruling coalition and they were also independent of each other. Athens had an urban ruling cohort but it was a maritime trading city built on a rocky peninsula. There almost wasn’t such a thing as a rural Athenian to have divergent interests with.
If New York was an independent city-state whose interests lay with maintaining relationships to people who could feed them and in maintaining its’ own class of defenders so as to not be conquered by this rural population its’ people and leadership would have a vastly different outlook. Ancient cities didn’t start out full of consumerist free riders, nor did rulers descend from such a cohort.”—
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-17 01:03:00 UTC
-
RT @Realistic_Right: @curtdoolittle & @jordanbpeterson, 2 of the world’s greates
RT @Realistic_Right: @curtdoolittle & @jordanbpeterson, 2 of the world’s greatest thinkers, both say the foundation of Western Civ is TRUTH…
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-15 01:42:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/831679971659767809
-
Retweeted Realistic_Right (@Realistic_Right): @curtdoolittle & @jordanbpeterson,
Retweeted Realistic_Right (@Realistic_Right):
@curtdoolittle & @jordanbpeterson, 2 of the world’s greatest thinkers, both say the foundation of Western Civ is TRUTHFUL SPEECH.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-14 20:42:00 UTC
-
THE PROPERTARIAN TAKE ON WESTERN HISTORY (important concept) Let’s note that in
THE PROPERTARIAN TAKE ON WESTERN HISTORY
(important concept)
Let’s note that in propertarianism we don’t have to resort to the terms ‘good’ or ‘bad’ just true (moral) and false (immoral). If you work from the via-positiva, you are stuck with the impossible presumption of knowing the ‘good’. If you work from via-negativa, we only need to know know the bad. If you work from sovereignty over property-in-toto we can empirically test the bad, leaving only the good to survive the ‘battle’. (The origins of trial by combat are rational in this context).
And if you grasp that the only method of cooperating under sovereignty over property-in-toto is productive, fully informed, warrantied, transfer limited to productive externalities, then no ‘commands’ in ‘legislation’ exist: only contracts for exchanges. In some exchanges we are seeking merely reciprocal burden of the costs of the production of commons. In others we are seeking behavior in exchange for financing. In others we are seeking behavior in exchange for subsidy.
What Roman empire and the church provided was an insurer that monarchies(rulers) adhered to natural law – at least in commerce. In a world where monarchs could be readily replaced by advantage-seeking-peers if they broke natural law, and were given license by the church – the militias (people) would not defend their kings. This limited monarchies to an incremental evolution of christian natural law monarchies, culminating in the late medieval period as enlightened monarchs.
We blew it. We took a very long time to develop government without a state (rule of law), in sufficient scale across our civilization, that sovereignty reserved for the aristocracy, was nearly achieved at scale. By ‘jumping the gun’ with the enlightenment, and seizing power from the aristocracy and church, the anglos and french let loose the undomesticated animal man in the lower classes to undo that sovereignty that the aristocracy had spent 3500 years developing through the incremental suppression of parasitism, producing the incremental domestication, and incremental rise of animal man through slave, serf, freeman, lesser nobility, nobility, and aristocracy. Because by achieving aristocracy one has transcended parasitic man to sovereign brotherhood of non-parasitic humans.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-13 08:10:00 UTC
-
THE THREE COMMON NARRATIVES OF WESTERN CIV (important concept) (Note: I view #3
THE THREE COMMON NARRATIVES OF WESTERN CIV
(important concept)
(Note: I view #3 more broadly, as a set of waves: the invasion of the pre 1200bc civilizations from the north, the rise of those invaders, the hollowing-out of the celtic civilization making room for the german, and the german invasion from the north, hollowing out the ancient, and the Mulsim invasion from the east killing off the ancient and hollowing out the northern, and the rise of the Hanseatic (german), and the discovery of the Americas, interrupting the hanseatic, and the profits colonialism of which were used to hollow out the Hanseatic (German), and the present decline of the west because of that hollowing out, the invasion of european lands. The question is will we survive this ‘dark age’ at this scale of globalism?)
Eric Field on Metaschools
(from elsewhere)
Broadly speaking there are three metaschools of historiography for defining “Western” civilization.
1. Classical, which takes the classical Mediterranean from the Greco-Roman civilization as being the origin and nucleus of what has become Anglo-American civilization.
2. Medievalist, which views the rise of Christianity, usually the rise of the Church after the fall of Rome as the foundation of our current civilization.
3. Or the sort of Nordic model that Oswald Spengler advocated that asserts that the northern Indo-Europeans (Germanic and Celtic tribes, but later Balts and Slavs as well) came south, smashed into Rome, destroying Classical civilization, but ultimately absorbing the remnants into their own culture.
Academic elites in the West tended to use a mixture of theories 1 and 2. The United States is semi-unique amongst westerners for relying on a much bastardized version of theory two, which places Christianity as the defining role. I’m partial to the third model, but I am an ethnic German, and I think it does a great job reconciling Anglo-American frontier experience with a larger Northern European pattern of migration that goes back to at least the Völkerwanderung.
The Point I’m trying to make with this really autistic unsolicited history lecture is of the three historiographical schools of western civ, Americans (especially the rightwing) tend to be shaped by a version that considers Christianity the central defining feature of this civilization.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-13 07:22:00 UTC
-
(I don’t think of it as marxist terms by the way. The west has always practiced
(I don’t think of it as marxist terms by the way. The west has always practiced the model of aristocracy, nobility, burgher, freeman, serf, slave, and ‘other’. All that changes is the distribution of power between aristocracy(military), nobility (managerial), and clergy (administrative). What’s ‘Novel’ is the expansion of the ‘burgher’ s (merchants) and the transfer of the clerical class and revenues from the clergy to what we consider the middle class. )
—“Results from these three research methods suggests that in the United States today approximately 15 to 20 percent are in the poor, lower class; 30 to 40 percent are in the working class; 40 to 50 percent are in the middle class; and 1 to 3 percent are in the rich, upper class.”—-
I use Paul Fussel’s book “Class” as the best overall analysis to date.
Prior to the enlightenment, 50% of europe’s lands were in the hands of the church and rented out for profit. The monasteries produced goods and functioned as the ‘big corporations do today’, The clergy, because it maintained a near monopoly on literacy, fulfilled much of the clerical labor force – at least as far as government went.
With the enlightenment and the printing press (a) the clergy no longer had a monopoly (similar to today’s academy/state/media complex is losing it’s monopoly on the control of information, and (b) the revolutions deprived the church of its means of income, and (c) private industry could concentrate capital and invest and the church could not.
When Darwin dealt a death blow to the only income stream related to the church (a channel to the divine), the academy ‘left the parent’s home’ so to speak and took over teaching the ‘new religion of sciences’ so to speak.
Unfortunately, the truth was only appealing to the upper classes. So once the academy found the lies of the cosmopolitans to serve as a product for the ascendent middle, working, and lower classes, they stepped in and replaced the church as the propagandists and ‘priests’ of the new state.
What has happened, primarily since (a) the failure of the great society program, and (b) the fall of world communism, the expansive corruptoin of all socialist polities, and (c) the incremental erasure of the (((cosmopolitan pseudosciences))) strangely enough, in no small part by (((a group of intellectuals))) who are nearly forced to admit that given the record of democratic voting, the economic and political record, the results of cognitive, genetic, and archeological science, that the conservatives (aristocracy) was right all along.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-12 17:34:00 UTC