Curt Doolittle

Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • 1) The english immigrants were germanic, and were eugenicists before the term wa

    1) The english immigrants were germanic, and were eugenicists before the term was coined.

    2) the german immigrants improved on the english, by increasing the numbers of germanic peoples

    3) the scotts irish at least held onto our traditions.

    4) the consequences of the potato-famine irish and catholic were severe (see New England)

    5) the consequences of the italians were worse (see NE/NJ)

    6) the consequences of the (eastern) jews were the worst of all.

    7) the destruction of the souther black agrarian family was the tipping point.

    8) the invasion by the Caribbeans, south Americans (Mestizos), and Muslims has been catastrophic.

    And now we are at civil war.

    How can we measure these things? In effect on law.

    Who caused it? Look at THE DATA. Women + Catholics. Whose idea was it? Jews.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-22 11:33:00 UTC

  • Adam Voight I liked this guy’s lecture on the meaning of the Ottoman Caliphate a

    Adam Voight I liked this guy’s lecture on the meaning of the Ottoman Caliphate and the outcome of WWI.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=659f5wuTgzY

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-21 12:43:00 UTC

  • MESOPOTAMIA Which class rule evolved first mesopotamia: Warriors or Priests? (we

    MESOPOTAMIA

    Which class rule evolved first mesopotamia: Warriors or Priests? (we know the answer)

    Which class emerged in control of rule?

    Did that class adopt the role of the other (conflate)?

    Did that ruling class conflate roles of religion and law?

    Now, the little rhetorical problem here is that I made the original statements about the tendencies of CIVILIZATIONS to make use of different TECHNOLOGIES of organization, and the unintended consequences of those rules. I make this argument in order to expand upon the differnces between western, fertile crescent, hrappan/indian, and chinese civilizations, and how our earliest assumptions about the world, man, the good, and the true, originated in the ancient past and still govern us today – with unintended consequences. And I make this argument so that westerners understand why, as poor people, small in number, lacking concentrate capital of the river valleys, developed FASTER (not first, just faster) than other civilizations in the pre-historic, ancient, and modern eras.

    Why is that? Well, I think I know, and I think it’s something we CAN know.

    Here is another example.

    If we read the inscriptions from the Palace Stele from Ur, the Cuneiform of Cyrus and Darius and his Son Darius (starting with the 27th or Persian Dynasty), with the inscriptions of similar periods of the Egyptians (just prior to persian conquest), with the writings of Homer and shortly after of the ‘Athenians’, or any of the greeks, with the writing of the romans, of the german law and myth, of the english law and myth, then what is the difference in the method of narration, explanation and argument?

    All civilizations produce some level of occult(experiential), religion, myth, literature, history, law, mathematics, and ‘science'(existential). But we can actually MEASURE that distribution. And we can easily determine the level of conflation or deflation (from occult down to science) that governance relies upon, and we can measure changes in the economies that result from those (a) distributions of use and (b) use in government. So we can MEASURE the consequences of say, how chinese rule changed when the migrated from empirical to moral rule. We can measure the consequences of the use of islam by the aristocracy and it’s use as a method of general rule.

    (btw: the fellow in the original thread does not know just how much knowledge I have of the ancient middle east, but I’m pretty sure it’s comparatively non trivial. and it would turn into a pissing match if I took that avenue with him. )

    THE WAY WE SPEAK, THE METHODS OF NARRATION, EXPLANATION, ARGUMENT, AND DECIDABILITY profoundly influence us. And if we conduct rule by those different methods they profoundly affect us more. The problem is the means of rule by scientific law is expensive and requires a high trust low context society, and the means of mythological rule is inexpensive but only requires indoctrination in a high context but produces a low trust society.

    These are profound questions that explain our evolutionary differences.

    Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-21 11:08:00 UTC

  • THE ORIGINS OF CIVILIZATION: MILITIA, PROPERTY, MARRIAGE by Joel Davis Civilizat

    THE ORIGINS OF CIVILIZATION: MILITIA, PROPERTY, MARRIAGE

    by Joel Davis

    Civilization emerges from 3 fundamental institutions:

    1) Militia (how to compete in the violence market),

    2) Property (how to compete in the production market) and

    3) Marriage (how to compete in the reproduction market).

    The polity fails or succeeds in competition by the functionality of three institutions. Through success in the violence market, the polity may establish and regulate it’s production and reproduction markets (via property and marriage). The polity regulates these institutions by LAW.

    Women were given the power to influence law, they weren’t also given the responsibility to defend societies institutions in the violence market, without this responsibility they lack signals of threats in the violence market required to inform their decisions.

    As their interests extended most significantly into the production and reproduction markets, they have voted to progressively destroy the institutions of property and marriage to transfer improved competitiveness to themselves (a logical exercise of self-interest, considering the signaling they’re exposed to).

    Without allegiance to the polity established through ‘skin’ in the violence market, allegiance to property and marriage (as institutions of group competitive advantage) naturally lacks also.

    We have two options:

    – Determine a method of signaling to Women which brings them into allegiance with the group in the violence market (stable husbands and children seem to do this to conservative women).

    – Remove enfranchisement from female classes due to the inherent risks to the group in the violence market their collective actions cause.

    Or, potentially a third option.. Find a method of limiting female franchise to women who have a form of “skin” in the violence market (wives/mothers/daughters of men with “skin in the game”)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-19 21:20:00 UTC

  • OUR ERA IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ENLIGHTENMENTS: THE RESTORATION OF EUROPA FROM SEM

    OUR ERA IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ENLIGHTENMENTS: THE RESTORATION OF EUROPA FROM SEMITIC AND IRANIAN INFLUENCE.

    The enlightenment succeeded in the physical sciences, but not in the social sciences, and we can see the german, french, russian, jewish, chinese reactions as social counter-enlightenments. What seems to have been under development in the 1800’s in Germany was the second scientific enlightenment (which benefitted the USA mostly), and the second attempt at social scientific revolution. Poincare, Maxwell, Darwin, Weber/Pareto/Durkheim, Menger, Spencer, Nietzche, Popper(science), Hayek (law) all came very close, and Weber, Mises, Popper, Brouwer, and Bridgman actually independently came to about the same conclusion, but they could not succeed against the pseudoscientific marxists and keynesians, just as the enlightenment philosophers could not succeed against the church and state.

    We can succeed. Because we have cognitive science, the record of the failure of keynesian economics, the record of the failure of communism, socialism, social democracy and the record of failure of rousseauian and lockeian man.

    The world merely needs the answer that the first scientific enlightenment, the second failed enlightenment (german) and the american post-german attempt failed to produce.

    Social science = natural law = reciprocity and the unit of measure = property.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-19 17:34:00 UTC

  • Look: our ancestors organized the west to produce agency because agency is requi

    Look: our ancestors organized the west to produce agency because agency is required for fellow sovereigns. If you look at every other culture and civilization, what is it that those groups attempt to produce? Does islam teach agency? Does Confucianism? Does judaism? Does buddhism?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-19 13:46:00 UTC

  • I am on my side. I am on my kin’s side I am on my extended kin’s side I am on my

    I am on my side.

    I am on my kin’s side

    I am on my extended kin’s side

    I am on my civilization’s side.

    Truth happens to be the weapon of choice in this battle, because it lets us build commons and compete via commons against those that cannot compete via commons. And because it is by cunning deceits sold to women and the underclass that we have been defeated in the ancient and modern worlds.

    I considered myself a classical liberal. I had the constitution and declaration and a map of the world on my bedroom walls, and a set of encyclopedias under that map. I stared at them a lot. Not romantically, and not ideologically, but in the context of what I learned from those and other encyclopedias.

    I considered my self a libertarian (a hayekian classical liberal) when I believed in the potential of mankind..

    And current events have made me understand that such a fantasy was the product of european eugenics, and that the rest of humanity except for perhaps the Japanese and koreans is are still but animals, and we we must protect ourselves and our generations from them.

    I love sovereignty and will pay for it with my life.

    I love liberty for those who can pay for it.

    I love freedom for those who can wield it.

    For the rest, the best we can do is prevent them from harming us, our people, our civilization, and this planet.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-18 15:39:00 UTC

  • Superior, Yes. Not First, But Fastest, and Best

    SUPERIOR YES. NOT FIRST, BUT FASTEST AND BEST All evidence in the Stone, Copper, Bronze, Iron, Steel ages is not that whites were superior to all other races but that whites on the eurasian plain possessed certain geographic advantages that allowed them to avoid developing monolithic civilizations in order to defend against competitors from multiple directions so endemic to warmer climates. The general argument is that X civilization did something or other first. And this will always be true of the irrigated river valley civilizations, because of the caloric savings provided by those river valleys. But as a consequence whites never developed the ‘bads’ that came with monolithic social and political orders, or intellectual orders, or religious orders. So, while whites were individually wealthier, they were institutionally poorer. And as a consequence, whites preserved a professional warrior caste and dependence upon a militia. So because of this constant competition in all walks of life, combined with the ‘testimonial’ epistemology necessary in militia and warrior armies, whites advanced FASTER than the rest in each era. In other words, good farm land but lack of concentration of river floods, left the west with institutional disadvantages and lack of concentration of wealth, and preserved competition between individuals, families, tribes, nations, and later states. The consequence of preserving military epistemology (testimony: objective truth telling) across the land holding polity, and the competing institutions is *rapidity*. Whites calculate change more comfortably and faster than all other social orders, and this is even evident in our very precise (high syntax, low context) languages. And it is this organized chaos we call ‘markets in every aspect of life’ that produces such stressful uncertainty in western civilization, and we export that stress to all other civilizations, as we drag them against their will out of ignorance, superstition, stagnation, poverty, violence, tyranny and disease. So yes. Except for that period around 1000 between the plagues of Justinian and the black plague (Both brought from Asia), whites have been demonstrably superior. Not first. But always best. Are whites inferior?

  • Superior, Yes. Not First, But Fastest, and Best

    SUPERIOR YES. NOT FIRST, BUT FASTEST AND BEST All evidence in the Stone, Copper, Bronze, Iron, Steel ages is not that whites were superior to all other races but that whites on the eurasian plain possessed certain geographic advantages that allowed them to avoid developing monolithic civilizations in order to defend against competitors from multiple directions so endemic to warmer climates. The general argument is that X civilization did something or other first. And this will always be true of the irrigated river valley civilizations, because of the caloric savings provided by those river valleys. But as a consequence whites never developed the ‘bads’ that came with monolithic social and political orders, or intellectual orders, or religious orders. So, while whites were individually wealthier, they were institutionally poorer. And as a consequence, whites preserved a professional warrior caste and dependence upon a militia. So because of this constant competition in all walks of life, combined with the ‘testimonial’ epistemology necessary in militia and warrior armies, whites advanced FASTER than the rest in each era. In other words, good farm land but lack of concentration of river floods, left the west with institutional disadvantages and lack of concentration of wealth, and preserved competition between individuals, families, tribes, nations, and later states. The consequence of preserving military epistemology (testimony: objective truth telling) across the land holding polity, and the competing institutions is *rapidity*. Whites calculate change more comfortably and faster than all other social orders, and this is even evident in our very precise (high syntax, low context) languages. And it is this organized chaos we call ‘markets in every aspect of life’ that produces such stressful uncertainty in western civilization, and we export that stress to all other civilizations, as we drag them against their will out of ignorance, superstition, stagnation, poverty, violence, tyranny and disease. So yes. Except for that period around 1000 between the plagues of Justinian and the black plague (Both brought from Asia), whites have been demonstrably superior. Not first. But always best. Are whites inferior?

  • Invasion vs Immigration

    by John Dow

    1. Imagine two hypothetical nations.. Let’s call them Nation A and Nation B.
    2. They have different cultures.. Let’s call them Culture A and Culture B.
    3. And because of these different cultures, they have different sociopolitical structures.. Let’s call them Sociopolitical Structure A and Sociopolitical Structure B.
    4. Now, if a bunch of people from Nation A all decide to force their way into Nation B for the purpose of altering Nation B’s sociopolitical structure, we correctly call this an invasion.
    5. However, if a large number of people from Nation A immigrate to Nation B, they will gain sociopolitical influence, and because they have Culture A, they cause the sociopolitical structure to alter akin to Nation A.In both scenarios, people from Nation A are occupying Nation B and altering their sociopolitical structure.

      So really, a military invasion and mass immigration differ only in method, but have the same result.

      If someone aides a foreign power to invade their own nation, this is called treason, so why do we tolerate those who endorse and facilitate mass immigration?