Kin selection by morphology.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-race-and-ethnicity
Kin selection by morphology.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-race-and-ethnicity
Stop pretending that race is irrelevant and look at the data. It’s not.
https://www.quora.com/How-do-we-improve-race-relations-in-America
Advertising in eastern europe: how to look good for your friends, and how to have fun with your friends.
Advertising in america: how to buy stuff and eat stuff alone.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-09 11:44:00 UTC
https://arktos.com/product/faustian-man-in-a-multicultural-age/JUST GOT AN EMAIL FROM RICARDO DUCHESNE
New book is available today!
Of course, I”m going to recommend it to everyone even before I read it myself. 😉 But I will read it myself as soon as I can get my greedy hands on it.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-09 10:16:00 UTC
https://www.quora.com/Has-the-world-been-plunged-into-a-dark-immoral-age
https://www.quora.com/Has-the-world-been-plunged-into-a-dark-immoral-age
Are whites inferior? https://www.quora.com/Are-whites-inferior/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=b52990a0
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-05 02:19:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/838212450981904384
https://t.co/0Qp8zizYpWSUPERIOR YES. NOT FIRST, BUT FASTEST AND BEST
All evidence in the Stone, Copper, Bronze, Iron, Steel ages is that whites were superior to all other races but that whites on the eurasian plain possessed certain geographic advantages that allowed them to avoid developing monolithic civilizations in order to defend against competitors from multiple directions so endemic to warmer climates.
The general argument is that X civilization did something or other first. And this will always be true of the irrigated river valley civilizations, because of the caloric savings provided by those river valleys.
But as a consequence whites never developed the ‘bads’ that came with monolithic social and political orders, or intellectual orders, or religious orders. So, while whites were individually wealthier, they were institutionally poorer. And as a consequence, whites preserved a professional warrior caste and dependence upon a militia.
So because of this constant competition in all walks of life, combined with the ‘testimonial’ epistemology necessary in militia and warrior armies, whites advanced FASTER than the rest in each era.
In other words, good farm land but lack of concentration of river floods, left the west with institutional disadvantages and lack of concentration of wealth, and preserved competition between individuals, families, tribes, nations, and later states.
The consequence of preserving military epistemology (testimony: objective truth telling) across the land holding polity, and the competing institutions is *rapidity*.
Whites calculate change more comfortably and faster than all other social orders, and this is even evident in our very precise (high syntax, low context) languages.
And it is this organized chaos we call ‘markets in every aspect of life’ that produces such stressful uncertainty in western civilization, and we export that stress to all other civilizations, as we drag them against their will out of ignorance, superstition, stagnation, poverty, violence, tyranny and disease.
So yes. Except for that period around 1000 between the plagues of Justinian and the black plague (Both brought from Asia), whites have been demonstrably superior. Not first. But always best.
Are whites inferior?
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-04 21:20:00 UTC
—“Anyone ever read Weber’s “The Protestant Ethic?”—
I think the intellectual consensus is that weber confused cause and consequence. The protestant ethic was around for 4000 years, but was brought into its peak starting in 7-800 by the use of manorialism starting in holland. Spreading rapidly across the Hajnal line, and roughly in concert with the prohibition on cousin marriage. Protestants possessed the work ethic, but protestantism did not create it. Conversely it appears the work ethic created or justified protestantism.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-04 10:30:00 UTC
As we developed polities, economies, empires, and civilizations we cooperate in greater numbers, with greater anonymity, first across families, then tribes, then nations, and then races.
People in every region, in every race, in every era act POLITICALLY as a group even if they act pragmatically when acting individually in daily life.
The more possible it is to use political, economic, or military power to increase status for a group, the more likely it is to cause racial tensions.
Those states that have been most successful at minimizing racial and tribal tensions have been those that preserve majority control of political, economic, and military institutions such that while people may cooperate as individuals, they cannot compete as groups.
https://www.quora.com/How-does-civilization-lead-to-racism