ON THE FUTURE OF THE WESTERN “POLYTHEISTIC” SOCIAL ORDER I am trying to find a way to talk about the fact that we have never had a conflationary system of thought (monotheism) in the west, and have always had separation of church (peasantry) and state (nobility) and burgher/freeman (commerce). And taht the church (religion), the burgher (philosophy), and the state (law) all competed with their own narratives. The problem is the BINDING narrative. If christianity fails as teh binding narrative, how do we replace that binding narrative, yet preserve christianity for the underclasses (the weak) who need it? Germanicized christianity, even latinized christianity, differs from byzantine christianity, differs from judaism, differs from islamism, differs from egyptian and prior eras’ shamanism. Germanized christianity always possessed ALL models of thought, from the aristocratic and martial law, to the philosophy, to the religion of the poor. But we used each in its place. And christianity did serve as the majority doctrine since the vast majority of people were poor and ignorant. When that is true, it’s easy for the martial/legal, and the philosophical/commercial to ‘go along’ with the civic bingding narrative and rituals. The question is, now that the majority are not poor and ignorant, what is the binding narrative under which we can still make use of science, law, philosophy and christianity? I mean. christianity is fucking ridiculous. Church isn’t. Myth, Festival, Ritual, Discipline aren’t. They’re necessary. The content of jesus’ philosophy is trivial. The magical shit is nonsense. nothing but jewish and syrian and byzantine lies. the natural law that the church inherited from the romans and the stoics, and the science that the modern era inherited from the greeks and the engineering from romans is all there for us to use. History is there for us to use. By any measure we have ‘discovered’ that we, and less so the chinese, are ‘right’ and that everyone else is not only wrong but catastrophically and degeneratively wrong. So, how do we modernize the church, retain jesus’s (valuable teaching) but achieve in the modern world what Acquinas achieved in the ancient? how do we modernize the teachings of jesus, and the ancient lessons of babylonians so that they are compatible with the ancient lessons of the european peoples in greek, roman, germanic form? How do I start with sovereignty, agency, natural law, markets in everything and the transcendence of man of our ancestors, and include jesus’ advice that if we increase the size of our kin, but our understanding that there is a limit of our kin to those who are in fact our genetic kin, that we will be buying options on future cooperation that together make us more competitively powerful than all alternatives? There is only one ‘story’ of such a thing. IT IS THE STORY OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION FROM THE YAMNA TO TODAY, and the lionization of all those who demonstrated their continuance of it, and the demonization of all those who impeded or harmed it. And the semites and iranians (byzantines) seem to have done been those who impeded it.
Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology
-
History: Cimmerians, Scythians, Slavs
CIMMERIANS, SCYTHIANS, AND SLAVS The Cimmerians (also Kimmerians, Greek Κιμμέριοι Kimmerioi) are an ancient people, first mentioned in the late 8th century BC in Assyrian records. Likely originating in the Pontic steppe and invading by means of the Caucasus, they probably assaulted Urartu, a state in north eastern Anatolia subject to the Neo-Assyrian Empire, in c. 714 BC. They were defeated by Assyrian forces under Sargon II in 705 and turned towards Anatolia, conquering Phrygia in 696/5. They reached the height of their power in 652 after taking Sardis, the capital of Lydia; however an invasion of Assyrian controlled Anshan (Persia) was thwarted by the Assyrians. Soon after 619, Alyattes of Lydia defeated them. There are no further mentions of them in historical sources, but it is likely that they settled in Cappadocia. They may have been related to either Iranian or Thracian speaking groups which migrated under pressure of the Scythian expansion of the 9th to 8th century BC. According to Herodotus, the Cimmerians inhabited the region north of the Caucasus and the Black Sea during the 8th and 7th centuries BC (i.e. what is now Ukraine and Southern Russia), although it isn’t possible to identify the Cimmerians as the bearers of any specific archaeological culture in the region. The Scythians were among the earliest peoples to master mounted warfare. In the 8th century BC they possibly raided Zhou China. Soon after they expanded westwards and dislodged the Cimmerians from power on the Pontic Steppe. At their peak, Scythians came to dominate the entire steppe zone, stretching from the Carpathian Mountains in the west to central China (Ordos culture) and the south Siberia (Tagar culture) in the east, creating what has been referred to as the first Central Asian nomadic empire. They kept herds of horses, cattle, and sheep, lived in tent-covered wagons, and fought with bows and arrows on horseback. They developed a rich culture characterized by opulent tombs, fine metalwork, and a brilliant art style. Based in what is modern-day Ukraine, Southern European Russia, and Crimea, the western Scythians were ruled by a wealthy class known as the Royal Scyths. The Scythians established and controlled a vast trade network connecting Greece, Persia, India and China, perhaps contributing to the contemporary flourishing of those civilizations.[19] Settled metalworkers made portable decorative objects for the Scythians. These objects survive mainly in metal, forming a distinctive Scythian art. In the 7th century BC the Scythians crossed the Caucasus and frequently raided the Middle East along with the Cimmerians, playing an important role in the political developments of the region. Around 650–630 BC, Scythians briefly dominated the Medes of the western Iranian Plateau, stretching their power all the way to the borders of Egypt. After losing control over Media the Scythians continued intervening in Middle Eastern affairs, playing a leading role in the destruction of the Assyrian Empire in the Sack of Nineveh in 612 BC. The Scythians subsequently engaged in frequent conflicts with the Achaemenid Empire. The western Scythians suffered a major defeat against Macedonia in the 4th century BC, and were subsequently gradually conquered by the Sarmatians, a related Iranian people from Central Asia. The Eastern Scythians of the Asian Steppe (Saka) were attacked by the Yuezhi, Wusun and Xiongnu in the 2nd century BC, prompting many of them to migrate into South Asia, where they became known as Indo-Scythians. At some point, perhaps as late as the 3rd century AD after the demise of the Han dynasty and the Xiongnu, Eastern Scythians crossed the Pamir Mountains and settled in the western Tarim Basin, where the Scythian Khotanese and Tumshuqese languages are attested in Brahmi scripture from the 10th and 11th centuries AD. In Eastern Europe, by the early Medieval Ages, the Scythians and their closely related Sarmatians were eventually assimilated and absorbed (e.g. Slavicisation) by the Proto-Slavic population of the region. -
History: Cimmerians, Scythians, Slavs
CIMMERIANS, SCYTHIANS, AND SLAVS The Cimmerians (also Kimmerians, Greek Κιμμέριοι Kimmerioi) are an ancient people, first mentioned in the late 8th century BC in Assyrian records. Likely originating in the Pontic steppe and invading by means of the Caucasus, they probably assaulted Urartu, a state in north eastern Anatolia subject to the Neo-Assyrian Empire, in c. 714 BC. They were defeated by Assyrian forces under Sargon II in 705 and turned towards Anatolia, conquering Phrygia in 696/5. They reached the height of their power in 652 after taking Sardis, the capital of Lydia; however an invasion of Assyrian controlled Anshan (Persia) was thwarted by the Assyrians. Soon after 619, Alyattes of Lydia defeated them. There are no further mentions of them in historical sources, but it is likely that they settled in Cappadocia. They may have been related to either Iranian or Thracian speaking groups which migrated under pressure of the Scythian expansion of the 9th to 8th century BC. According to Herodotus, the Cimmerians inhabited the region north of the Caucasus and the Black Sea during the 8th and 7th centuries BC (i.e. what is now Ukraine and Southern Russia), although it isn’t possible to identify the Cimmerians as the bearers of any specific archaeological culture in the region. The Scythians were among the earliest peoples to master mounted warfare. In the 8th century BC they possibly raided Zhou China. Soon after they expanded westwards and dislodged the Cimmerians from power on the Pontic Steppe. At their peak, Scythians came to dominate the entire steppe zone, stretching from the Carpathian Mountains in the west to central China (Ordos culture) and the south Siberia (Tagar culture) in the east, creating what has been referred to as the first Central Asian nomadic empire. They kept herds of horses, cattle, and sheep, lived in tent-covered wagons, and fought with bows and arrows on horseback. They developed a rich culture characterized by opulent tombs, fine metalwork, and a brilliant art style. Based in what is modern-day Ukraine, Southern European Russia, and Crimea, the western Scythians were ruled by a wealthy class known as the Royal Scyths. The Scythians established and controlled a vast trade network connecting Greece, Persia, India and China, perhaps contributing to the contemporary flourishing of those civilizations.[19] Settled metalworkers made portable decorative objects for the Scythians. These objects survive mainly in metal, forming a distinctive Scythian art. In the 7th century BC the Scythians crossed the Caucasus and frequently raided the Middle East along with the Cimmerians, playing an important role in the political developments of the region. Around 650–630 BC, Scythians briefly dominated the Medes of the western Iranian Plateau, stretching their power all the way to the borders of Egypt. After losing control over Media the Scythians continued intervening in Middle Eastern affairs, playing a leading role in the destruction of the Assyrian Empire in the Sack of Nineveh in 612 BC. The Scythians subsequently engaged in frequent conflicts with the Achaemenid Empire. The western Scythians suffered a major defeat against Macedonia in the 4th century BC, and were subsequently gradually conquered by the Sarmatians, a related Iranian people from Central Asia. The Eastern Scythians of the Asian Steppe (Saka) were attacked by the Yuezhi, Wusun and Xiongnu in the 2nd century BC, prompting many of them to migrate into South Asia, where they became known as Indo-Scythians. At some point, perhaps as late as the 3rd century AD after the demise of the Han dynasty and the Xiongnu, Eastern Scythians crossed the Pamir Mountains and settled in the western Tarim Basin, where the Scythian Khotanese and Tumshuqese languages are attested in Brahmi scripture from the 10th and 11th centuries AD. In Eastern Europe, by the early Medieval Ages, the Scythians and their closely related Sarmatians were eventually assimilated and absorbed (e.g. Slavicisation) by the Proto-Slavic population of the region. -
Western Polytheism Expressed in Languages of the Classes
WESTERN POLYTHEISM AND THE LANGUAGES OF THE CLASSES While truths must exist universally but are invariant (the meaning of a truth), there are also some universal goods (like truth), but many variable and often competing goods (wants and needs). And as such we require narratives to explain both the universal truth, the universal good, and the particular goods that are used by each class.
That said, the strong rule and decide, the burghers organize, produce, distribute, and exchange, and the poor and weak gossip and complain. And each tells the story of his class by attributing virtue to his utterances. We learn to speak the law of the strong, the philosophy of the utilitarian, and the religion of the weak. These are not complicated concepts to master. -
Western Polytheism Expressed in Languages of the Classes
WESTERN POLYTHEISM AND THE LANGUAGES OF THE CLASSES While truths must exist universally but are invariant (the meaning of a truth), there are also some universal goods (like truth), but many variable and often competing goods (wants and needs). And as such we require narratives to explain both the universal truth, the universal good, and the particular goods that are used by each class.
That said, the strong rule and decide, the burghers organize, produce, distribute, and exchange, and the poor and weak gossip and complain. And each tells the story of his class by attributing virtue to his utterances. We learn to speak the law of the strong, the philosophy of the utilitarian, and the religion of the weak. These are not complicated concepts to master. -
Militia > Sovereignty > Natural Law > Markets > Transcendence. You want to see t
Militia > Sovereignty > Natural Law > Markets > Transcendence. You want to see the whole tree of western civ? Here: https://propertarianism.com/2017/05/02/the-causes-of-the-west/
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-02 16:46:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/859449055977648129
-
The western group evolutionary strategy can be summed up in one word: INTOLERANC
The western group evolutionary strategy can be summed up in one word: INTOLERANCE. We call it ‘sovereignty’ because we’re polite. #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-02 16:44:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/859448634198372352
-
The Causes of the West
Cool or Cold Climate > Low Population Density > Low Survival of Unfit > Greater Cooperation > Low ‘Clannishness’Distributed Production (low returns of hunting, farming, raiding) > Voluntary Militia ( Defense and Raiding/Offense)Distributed Production(low returns) > Voluntary Militia + ‘Advanced’ Technology + Maneuver > Military Superiority > Prosperity (defense and offense) > High Risk Heroism as a means of climbing the dominance hierarchy > Broad Opportunity and Incentive.Voluntary Militia (Raiding) + Military Superiority > Superior competition > Raiding for Profit > Rule for Profit > Domestication for profit > Production for Profit > Trade for Profit > Innovation for profit > Rents for Profit > Maximization of rents > Fragility to Shocks > Overextension or Inability to adapt. > Defeat.Voluntary Militia > Sovereignty(Intolerance)> Natural Law (Reciprocity) > Markets in Everything > Association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities.Markets in Everything > Climbing Dominance Hierarchy> Innovation > Faster Evolution > Division of Labor and Knowledge > Ever-Decreasing Costs > Imitation by Competitors > Co-Evolution.Voluntary Militia > Reporting/Testimony > Natural Law (Reciprocity) > Markets for Dispute Resolution > Jury > Reason, Rationalism, Logic, Empiricism, Science, Operationalism, ‘Coincidence-ism’. > Incremental and Rapid Suppression of parasitism > minimization of oppy for rents/frauds > forced maximization of effort and innovation for survival > increasing productivity > increasing competitive ability.THE INDUSTRIALIZATION OF MARKETS AND INNOVATION VIA COMMONS RATHER THAN MONOPOLY AND RENTS VIA PRIVATIZATION. Or stated differently: the maximization of production vs the maximization of rents because of constant pressure of coevolution.THE RESULT:Militia > Sovereignty > Natural Law > Markets In Everything > Transcendence of Man. -
The Causes of the West
Cool or Cold Climate > Low Population Density > Low Survival of Unfit > Greater Cooperation > Low ‘Clannishness’Distributed Production (low returns of hunting, farming, raiding) > Voluntary Militia ( Defense and Raiding/Offense)Distributed Production(low returns) > Voluntary Militia + ‘Advanced’ Technology + Maneuver > Military Superiority > Prosperity (defense and offense) > High Risk Heroism as a means of climbing the dominance hierarchy > Broad Opportunity and Incentive.Voluntary Militia (Raiding) + Military Superiority > Superior competition > Raiding for Profit > Rule for Profit > Domestication for profit > Production for Profit > Trade for Profit > Innovation for profit > Rents for Profit > Maximization of rents > Fragility to Shocks > Overextension or Inability to adapt. > Defeat.Voluntary Militia > Sovereignty(Intolerance)> Natural Law (Reciprocity) > Markets in Everything > Association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities.Markets in Everything > Climbing Dominance Hierarchy> Innovation > Faster Evolution > Division of Labor and Knowledge > Ever-Decreasing Costs > Imitation by Competitors > Co-Evolution.Voluntary Militia > Reporting/Testimony > Natural Law (Reciprocity) > Markets for Dispute Resolution > Jury > Reason, Rationalism, Logic, Empiricism, Science, Operationalism, ‘Coincidence-ism’. > Incremental and Rapid Suppression of parasitism > minimization of oppy for rents/frauds > forced maximization of effort and innovation for survival > increasing productivity > increasing competitive ability.THE INDUSTRIALIZATION OF MARKETS AND INNOVATION VIA COMMONS RATHER THAN MONOPOLY AND RENTS VIA PRIVATIZATION. Or stated differently: the maximization of production vs the maximization of rents because of constant pressure of coevolution.THE RESULT:Militia > Sovereignty > Natural Law > Markets In Everything > Transcendence of Man. -
The Names of Aryanism (Sovereignty)
THE NAMES OF ARYANISM : THE CAUSE OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION Aryanism: (19th Century) Associating the name of set of tribes with their strategy, telling us nothing about the constitution of their strategy.
The Faustian Spirit: (German Legend ~1400?) A literary allusion to the western predilection for experiment, change, and achievement. Again, this tells us almost nothing about causality, only the description of a few values. Aristocratic Egalitarianism: (Duchesne) A descriptive title of a military and political strategy that states that distributed rule of peers can scale by opening the franchise for participation in rule, and its benefits (property and commissions/taxes) is open to all who will pay for it by demonstrating merit in family, industry, and war. (compare to the chinese method of entering the bureaucracy through examination and the consequences thereof) Aryanism as Markets for Rule: (Duchesne) A descriptive insight expanding upon Aristocratic Egalitarianism, by adding that aryanism spread through the construction of markets for polities. Sovereignty. (Doolittle) A causal description. Since by the demand for sovereignty one can only scale through aristocratic egalitarianism, and one is limited to the resolution of conflicts by natural law of reciprocity, meaning that all association, cooperation, reproduction, production, production of commons, and production of polities must be achieved through sovereign, productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of negative externality. And By the combination of sovereignty, natural law, markets in everything, the need to scale, the provision of scale through the selection for agency, and thereby the incremental domestication of man, transcends man through imitation of sovereignty, reward for agency and sovereignty, and the deprivation and diminution of those who lack agency, cannot act in sovereign fashion, and therefore cannot cooperate via markets, and therefore cannot participate in rule. And that is the CAUSE of western civilization. For a militia of voluntary warriors, desirous of preservation of their sovereignty, Sovereignty is the only political solution, leading to natural law and markets in everything. DO YOU UNDERSTAND YET? ARYANISM: MARKETS IN EVERYTHING? Abrahamism imposes artificial equality where we are only equal if we are slaves. Western religion was originally pagan, meaning a hierarchical family, infinitely extensible, where individuals could find both virtues to imitate, sins to avoid, and advocates for their roles in society at every single level. Abrahamism is not a market strategy for a division of knowledge, labor and advocacy among many small extended clans organized into nation states, but an authoritarian and monopolistic one for the production and maintenance of a despotic empire.Aryanism *IS* a market strategy, and our original religion provided us with a both a unifying narrative of an extended family with virtues, sins, roles, and interests, custom tailored gods, demi gods, heroes, and great men to appeal to. Our god was not demanding, or commanding, or even engaged, but provided wisdom, justice, and decisions in exchange for offerings – *a trade*. Do you understand the difference between Aryanism and Semitism yet? Markets and families, vs Monopoly and Empire. No excuses. No more lies. End the pollution of the west. Imitate the only other superior people on this earth, the east asians, and insulate ourselves from the ‘people of the center’ who failed to transcend from beast to man.