NUTSHELL: SOCIAL ORDERS
As far as I know, the traditional family is the optimum association of kin for the purpose of reproduction and production.
As far as I know, only the Absolute nuclear family could evolve total suppression of parasitism.
As far as I know, nothing prevents the total suppression of parasitism (high trust) while at the same time advocating the traditional family.
Law must be constructed for individuals, but policy can easily be constructed for families.
But this means that the quality of one’s family influences one’s life.
So the underclass want to be free of their family constraints.
And to parasitically consume the better families as a reproductive strategy: to reduce the competition of good genes, by expanding the production of bad genes.
As far as I know the only substantive differences between groups are in the distribution of intellectual biases, intellectual capabilities and aggression.
As far as I know the reason groups defeat other groups is that they increase the rates of reproduction of either their underclasses and expand territorially, or they decrease the rates of reproduction of their underclasses and expand economically and intellectually.
So we can choose between equalitarian poverty (islam), poverty and castes (india/brazil), hierarchy and totalitarianism (china), or egalitarianism and aristocracy (old northern europe).
The question is only whether we suppress the rates of reproduction of the underclasses and expand the rates of reproduction of the upper classes.
Source date (UTC): 2015-06-18 05:13:00 UTC