Category: Business, Organization, and Management

  • HOW THE PROPERTARIAN ORGANIZATION FUNCTIONS Listen. John opens the sales funnel

    HOW THE PROPERTARIAN ORGANIZATION FUNCTIONS

    Listen. John opens the sales funnel – with promise of revolution and renaissance. I produce content that creates the legitimacy of the solution. The team picks up on the people with potential. The SN group then educates them in how to convert political natural law to applied personal philosophy. The Institute takes the best and teaches them the law. This is our “organization”. We will need to move to promotion this year and we will be able to do that because enough parties are involved now, and we have enough momentum. We need to roughly double the number of top people this year. And do it again the next. Then we will start owning the discourse. (And when I start making the videos on lying it’s going to go viral.)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 11:58:00 UTC

  • MEN… Don’t be the idiot in the meeting ‘reminding’ others of the obvious risks

    MEN…

    Don’t be the idiot in the meeting ‘reminding’ others of the obvious risks – it means you’re a coward and think in cowardly terms, and offer advice as pretense of courage. Instead, be the person looking for, seizing, and assisting on the seizure of opportunities to exploit.

    We need brave men, not cowardly women.

    You demonstrate what you are by what you say.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-17 14:07:00 UTC

  • Control or Liquidity. Choose. You don’t get both. That’s why shares are sold by

    Control or Liquidity. Choose. You don’t get both. That’s why shares are sold by false promise.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-17 11:38:00 UTC

  • I run tests. I don’t put all eggs in a basket. We learn from every test

    I run tests. I don’t put all eggs in a basket. We learn from every test.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-16 18:27:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217876016372375554

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217870079507017728


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1217870079507017728

  • I think the business model problem is more cause of distraction than decline in

    I think the business model problem is more cause of distraction than decline in ability.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-13 22:35:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216851295451205638

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216841864843800578


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216841864843800578

  • GOHN I’ve followed this guy for quite a few years as an example of someone whose

    https://www.bing.com/search?q=carlos+gohn+arrested&PC=U316&FORM=CHROMNCARLOS GOHN

    I’ve followed this guy for quite a few years as an example of someone whose empirical management and workload was something I simply had to be in awe of. I don’t know if he’s guilty of anything yet but his skill is certainly something to study. He was brutal (american) in both France and Japan. He did a job wth Renault. Then he saved Nissan. But he’s been accused of financial reporting issues. Running both Renault and Nissan at the same time. But this put Japanese and french companies in conflict because Nissan is far better in engineering and selling into both Asia and america. This was a mistake. He should have taken one or the other. And he was … excessively greedy in executive compensation. Japan, esp, does not tolerate high exec pay. I”m not sure what he’s being accused of is a ‘crime’.

    Mixing companies across cultures does not work well.

    https://www.bing.com/search?q=carlos+gohn+arrested&PC=U316&FORM=CHROMNUpdated Jan 13, 2020, 4:04 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-13 04:04:00 UTC

  • YOU DON”T NEED TO BE AN ENTREPRENEUR, JUST ON AN ENTREPRENEURIAL TEAM Competitiv

    YOU DON”T NEED TO BE AN ENTREPRENEUR, JUST ON AN ENTREPRENEURIAL TEAM

    Competitiveness isn’t always a good thing to wish in yourself. For those of us that are hyper competitive, the warfare – so to speak – is more enjoyable than the loot that comes from winning it. I don’t like internal conflict but I love external competition. All of us that ‘achieve’ are the same. We love the battle. We’d rather fight hard and lose than not fight at all. You probably can’t make yourself do that. You can however, get on a TEAM with those that do. And use loyalty, work, and discipline to assist them – and get the loot. In other words, don’t necessarily want to be in CHARGE of warfare. Benefit from supporting those who do.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-10 14:48:00 UTC

  • THE WORK IS DONE FOR YOU; JUST PLUG AND PLAY by @[11019687:2048:Brandon Hayes] D

    THE WORK IS DONE FOR YOU; JUST PLUG AND PLAY

    by @[11019687:2048:Brandon Hayes]

    Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth; it’s 2020. Take a good look at it. Look at it again. If you don’t like it, there’s a single way to change it; accept it and modify it along the lines of natural law; reciprocity; and make something of it for yourself.

    You’re brilliant and technologically advanced; only your addictions and lies stand in your way. Accepting reality isn’t a burden; that’s always been a lie. A lie to keep you from seeing the simple truth. Life is simple and beautifully so.

    You want Eden; this is the closest you get with resorting to fantasy. No lies; just calculation for cooperation. Worried about restitution, P’s got it in spades.

    Let those most fit to bear the burdens of the world bear them as they ought; know it’s your duty to do your damnedest not to add to this burden; the attempts to fit round pegs into square holes and similar unfruitful endeavors ought cease. We have acted in a counter-productive fashion long enough.

    P does parsimony so you can do action. I’m not interested in your abstract expressions nor your virtue signals… can you be the change you scream about needing so badly? Cause now’s your chance.Updated Jan 10, 2020, 12:57 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-10 12:57:00 UTC

  • As far as I know Trump manages just like I do, and it’s the optimum method of ge

    As far as I know Trump manages just like I do, and it’s the optimum method of getting the truth out of people. He brings in the staff, he puts the person reporting to one side, and senior staff sits on the couches behind. He fosters debate. He instigates debate. He even instigates conflict.

    Now, what happens when you read reports instead? What happens if you listen to briefings instead? You are captured (as was obama) by the frame.

    Trump falsifies. (I do the same fking thing)

    Then he stays on mission: what will advance america’s interests first *now that peace and harmony are no longer in american interests, but each country’s taking full responsibility is on our interests.*

    King of the hill.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 17:05:00 UTC

  • NOTES ON CORP OWNERSHIP REFORM Legal Perspective True: “The purpose of the corpo

    NOTES ON CORP OWNERSHIP REFORM

    Legal Perspective

    True: “The purpose of the corporation is to do anything lawful.” And “Corporations are real, shareholders are a fiction.” In other words, shareholders are not owners. Companies do not work to maximize shareholder value. That is a fiction to sell investors.

    A management team balances brand awareness, market share, customers, employees, bankers, investors, and vendors, each of which is competing to maximize their take of the profits if their are any.

    Thoughts: (a) Owners ‘invest’ to obtain income and appreciation but lack liquidity.

    (b) Shareholders function as lenders who purchase liquidity and opportunity for dividends and appreciation – they are not owners, that is the myth.

    (c) From the company’s perspective, dividends and appreciation are the cost of maintaining borrowing capacity in capital markets so that opportunities can be seized by rapid appeal to capital markets.

    (d) Boards of other than owners are a wast of time money and energy – a kabuki theater – and instead, companies should be, and are, insured to act in the interest of their contract with the shareholders. The very best you can say about boards is (i) you can pay people for relationships, assistance, and information. (ii) when you are unsure and want to bounce ideas off peers rather than employees but be sure it won’t leak, they’re useful. (iii) preparing for board meetings makes sure that you and your team are on the same page and understand your own business. (iv) I use my boards exclusively to test my ideas and rarely do anything if I can’t convince them unanimously. This tempers my too-high risk tolerance. It gives me political cover with the staff and others if I make a mistake.

    (e) It’s not even clear that financial reports other than to auditors and insurers are of any value other than in selling to lenders (shareholders). Randomly select financial reports from your favorite companies. You will learn far more from analyst calls.

    (f) Trying to maintain or improve shareholder value, is a terrible practice because investment cycles (capital requirements necessary for returns) have been increasing, and the division of production distribution and trade fragmenting, but lifespan of companies are decreasing – for this very reason. Innovators dilemmas everywhere. No one tries to maximize shareholder value. That’s nonsense. You try to preserve it. the objective of nearly every business is to preserve it’s existence as a going concern for all those involved: customers, employees, owners, vendors, investors. It is very hard to build a business that produces a durable income stream because the customer vendor employee network is the most difficult organization to produce.

    (g) There is no reason whatsoever that companies should direct resources to ‘charities’ or ‘movements’, instead of requiring such donations come from individuals. Social responsibly is a code word for rent-seeking because the government is incapable of providing results. The current condition is that companies are frequently blackmailed if they don’t contribute to certain causes. That’s an injustice. That one shall do no harm is the best an organization can do and is the best therefore we can ask them to do.

    Lastly unless you’ve run a company of at least say, 50M, and preferably over 100M you have no idea just how difficult it is to produce a profit. (i) My primary complaint is that companies do not themselves maintain accounting for operations (cash: profit and loss from operations), management (ops plus overhead), owners (ops, overhead, assets, and yes, market share ), lenders (EBITDA), and the state (taxes, amortization, and depreciation).

    Most executives I’ve consulted, companies I’ve acquired, or accounting departments I’ve fought with, have too poor a grasp of operations and obscure it by conflating accounting data so to obscure normal volatility and variation in risk from investors and lenders, and to minimize taxes.

    Drive employee quality, operations, marketshare, and leave everything else to finance and accounting. Money is just another resource provided by vendors.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-01 20:47:00 UTC