Curt Doolittle

Category: Business, Organization, and Management

  • To most men I say either (a) go into the most complicated and technical trade yo

    To most men I say either (a) go into the most complicated and technical trade you can possibly get into. (b) Get into tech if you can (c) get into business if you can. (d) as fast as you can gain expertise get into sales, and from sales to entrepreneurship or executive position – if you have the IQ and discipline. If you stay in a trade plan on your career tanking after 40, and halving your income. If you get into an exec position plan on it tanking after 50 and tanking your income. This means pay off your goddamn house by 40 and you’re golden.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 19:56:00 UTC

  • yep. It’s all about (a) catching the interested, (b) educating the willing, (c)

    yep. It’s all about (a) catching the interested, (b) educating the willing, (c) encouraging the involved, (d) making leaders of the convinced.

    That’s what we do: our organizational funnel:
    Advocates > John Mark > Me > Bill Joslin > The Team > the involved.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 16:54:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224375717137473536

    Reply addressees: @The_Petrichory

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224375182015418372

    IN REPLY TO:

    @The_Petrichory

    @curtdoolittle I feel ya. I’ve said exactly the same in the past myself.

    On the very rare occasion I’ve managed to get someone to concede they were wrong, they were back to saying the same exact shit the next day.

    I can only hope the lurkers gain something from it all.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224375182015418372

  • Boards, Executives, Shareholders, Employees, have limited liability for the Ward

    Boards, Executives, Shareholders, Employees, have limited liability for the Ward (corporation). That’s the purpose of corporations. I am kind of surprised that Platonism, against which legal education should protect, is something you cannot seem to avoid – or even comprehend.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 13:41:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224327002422943744

    Reply addressees: @EBryceLee @CorwinElder @FrostieCash @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224326106419015681

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EBryceLee @CorwinElder @FrostieCash @clairlemon Papers and Titles can’t act, so can’t agree. Only people can act.

    Corporations are not superior to people, they are WARDS of people (children). People can act on behalf of wards, wards cannot act. All corporations regardless of tax and decision constraint are operated by people.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224326106419015681

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @EBryceLee @CorwinElder @FrostieCash @clairlemon Papers and Titles can’t act, so can’t agree. Only people can act.

    Corporations are not superior to people, they are WARDS of people (children). People can act on behalf of wards, wards cannot act. All corporations regardless of tax and decision constraint are operated by people.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224326106419015681

  • (We cannot ‘launch’ early. It’s why most startups fail. A movement is no differe

    (We cannot ‘launch’ early. It’s why most startups fail. A movement is no different from a business. We will ‘launch’ this year. But we lead with solution not emotionally satisfying but ultimately defeating rallying for the sake of rallying without a definite ‘contract’. )

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 11:21:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224291842159783936

    Reply addressees: @NISquadron @HeadProph @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224195111527092224

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224195111527092224

  • LAUNCHING THIS YEAR We cannot ‘launch’ early. It’s why most startups fail. A mov

    LAUNCHING THIS YEAR

    We cannot ‘launch’ early. It’s why most startups fail. A movement is no different from a business. The market timing matters. We will ‘launch’ this year. But we lead with the solution – not an emotionally satisfying but ultimately defeating rallying for the sake of rallying without a definite ‘contract’.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 11:09:00 UTC

  • Another of my favorite CEO tactics: “Curt, we should do this…” OK. How would w

    Another of my favorite CEO tactics:

    “Curt, we should do this…”

    OK. How would we do that? What would we not do in order to do that instead? Who will do it and be responsible for doing it? I’m willing to do it if you can make it happen.

    Teaching moment.

    I save up those ideas and sort of auction them off during the next strategy session. 😉

    People make sh-t happen if they commit to it in public.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 11:16:00 UTC

  • When looking at the numbers in SN (Sheepdog Nomocracy), at any given moment abou

    When looking at the numbers in SN (Sheepdog Nomocracy), at any given moment about 5% of total followers actively participate. of those that actively participate roughly 10% (a bit lower) actually contribute through learning operationalism.

    this breaks out number as

    1) those that follow or stay connected passively

    2) those that find and work at learning P arguments for their purposes

    3) those that use the methodology.

    So really we have those that use the product of P and those that generate the product of P.

    Learning e-prime shifts P participation from consumption to production.

    P exists as

    1) (noun) output of the methodology.

    2) (verb) doing the methodology

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 17:54:00 UTC

  • Vet Transition (anti war anti military rhetoric, and they internlize it, and the

    Vet Transition (anti war anti military rhetoric, and they internlize it, and they’re told they’re traumatized when they don’t think they are. Something like an ed program for them and how to form arguments and defend themselves. the school on line might be a perfect platform for it. Give them tools to be able to fight the hostility from civilians when they get back. Recreate that brotherhood in back in civilian life. “Professors for a warrior class”. Three themes 1) mimicry – stolen valor, appropriating military identify cheapening what’ they’ve earned, 2) feel isolated, because they don’t have the command structure. 3) being told the struggles because they’re missing it, that they’re traumatized. 5) the hostility from civilians … you’re fighting unjust wars. 6) acquisitionalism will clarify what they’re going thru personally. … 7) train the trainers so that they can do it…. 8) The language is a big problem but they see the value neutral language. You do’t have time for … non military ‘epistemology’ and they come back to white noise and posturing and ‘female’ nonsense. 9) military life is disambiguated, and the current churn is ambiguous. We’re offering this ‘clarity’ this value neutral clarity. 10) having a higher purpose .. especially these special forces guys. They’re only team players in pursuit of a higher purpose.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 12:37:00 UTC

  • JOIN US ON TELEGRAM IF… So yes. And please invite others. I don’t tolerate spa

    JOIN US ON TELEGRAM IF…
    https://t.me/propertarians

    So yes. And please invite others. I don’t tolerate spamming, or memes, or anything other than intelligent discourse. It’s for discussion only.

    I’m not dissident right. I’m a revolutionary constitutionalist like Washington. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 22:43:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223014018790645760

  • Telegram: Propertarians. So yes. And please invite others. I don’t tolerate spam

    Telegram: Propertarians.
    https://t.me/propertarians

    So yes. And please invite others. I don’t tolerate spamming, or memes, or anything other than intelligent discourse. It’s for discussion only.

    I’m not dissident right. I’m a revolutionary constitutionalist like washington. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 22:42:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223013757984616448

    Reply addressees: @SirJohn981

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223012219710996480

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223012219710996480