yeah, well, as someone else said, it has a tendency to just repeat whatever you say.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 18:41:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881774189855838357
Reply addressees: @BlameMaxSand
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881771928916214043
Smart. though oddly, Nietzche, in his first book, was the first to truly understand the problem.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 18:40:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881773941083320463
Reply addressees: @JRuebl47185
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881772600948556015
Q: “A DANGEROUS PLACE TO BE?”
We are just going through the same cycles over and over again. We’re ending the domestic internal seditions just as we ended the foreign external seditions. )Reagan used the economy to bankrupt the soviets and ended the communist movements worldwide.)
And we will continue to until we end the feminine – abrahamic – marxist – progressive – left’s attempts to use government to facilitate individual and collective irresponsibility instead of facilitate the maximum responsibility each can carry – which of course, will bring back the british awareness of class. Which we can then use to facilitate the needs of classes versus pretending we can all join the upper middle class – a lie which leads to the massive perception of either failure or being left behind.
The secret to the west’s success versus the rest, in all three ages of history, is institutionalization of universal insurance of self determination by self determined means (freedom), by sovereignty in demonstrated interests (merit), and reciprocity in display word and deed (morality) requiring truth before face (reals over feels), while attempting to mature the emotional, weak, and fearful into adulthood to bear those responsibilities (paternalism).
The progressive left tried to make domestication into oppression, and irresponsibility and face-before-truth into a norm – thus MATERNAL rather than paternal, and infantilizing rather than maturing. It failed. It failed just as abrahamic religions failed and gave us dark ages, the J-problem of organized crime against the hose, and the Muslim problem of warfare against civilizations that didn’t fail as they did.
Reply addressees: @trust_gabe
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 18:38:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881773445115170816
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881769851204804939
No that’s not it. Don’t always go to conspiracies.
It’s that we have a long history of debate over the pornography to prostitution spectrum. It’s ancient. This is a new debate, and it’s not about personal corruption but POLITICAL corruption on the scale of an invasive and hostile religion (such as judaism and Islam.)
We solve it by understanding both and outlawing both.
And we outlaw the ADL’s techniques as well for the same reason.
Reply addressees: @calabrianvice @ovensoflove @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 18:26:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881770243762290688
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881769587643142404
WHY AM I AN ANTI-PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHER? 😉
(I consider myself a scientist, even if that science is largely epistemology. For what is science but epistemic?)
Philosophy is best understood as a record of the history of our attempt at understanding by the middle and upper middle class’ attempt to persuade the aristocracy to modify their and collective behavior. I didnt study philosophy until I wanted to know what went wrong. And then I studied it from recent to historical – backwards. This is why I have a low opinion of people who try to USE philosophy, despite saying philosophy is often very hard.
You almost can’t grasp all the traps and errors in human thinking whether present or historical without that study, but you can’t really find any answers there. The answers are in history (evidence) and science (and in my case, operationalism which is the end point of science.)
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 18:22:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881769414959452160
You are now more skilled at understanding the problem than four nines to the right of the decimal in the entirety of the population. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 18:13:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881767077876523102
Reply addressees: @calabrianvice @ovensoflove @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881766806106640809
(Everyone is at risk of misreading me, but you are doing a lot better than most. 😉 )
OK. Agreed so far.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 18:12:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881766942643818840
Reply addressees: @calabrianvice @ovensoflove @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881766314085364177
–“Q: Problem: the inability (of moderns) to see that humans are animals”–
Or the false promise of the marxists-to-progressives that we are not has been successfully indoctrinated into the population. After all, the entire. marxist sequence is a denial of the four categories of laws of the universe: measurement and commensurability (logic, truth), scarcity (physical), survival(behavioral, acquisition, self interest), evolutionary (genetic, neoteny, sex, load, differentiation).
But saying we’re animals, is a narrative analogy still – it’s not precise enough to work with. We solve differences in understanding with precision of measurement.
Humanity is just our extraordinary ability capacity to adapt because of the volume of neurons, the time, space, and population capacity to predict using that memory, and our transfer of information by imitation(physical), empathizing (feeling), and sympathize (reasoning) and verbalizing (continuous recursive disambiguation of information into that action we call speech).
Any creature with the same spectrum of senses (spectrum of vibrations, and all neural cells do is respond to vibrations at different frequencies) and same neural density in the same recursive hierarchy in relation to body size and form, should produce the capacity for mutual understanding and eventual communication.
umans are very different from animals in capacity for adaptability in time but not different in dependence upon defeat of entropy by acquiring more complex caloric sources than we expend in time, nor in our instinct, intuition, and valuations.
Affections
CD
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 18:01:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881763956701929472
WHY PHILOSOPHY AS WE UNDERSTAND IT IS DEAD: A CONVERSATION WITH A FRIEND
–“Q: What’s the point of [any] f*cking book [of philosophy] if you don’t say any of the contextual details of the situation”–
Ergo why philosophy died with darwin. The analytic philosophy movement was the last gasp of trying to ‘science’ philosophy. The sciences then defeated philosophy. But they have failed to coalesce into a substitute for philosophy or theology or mythology for that matter. So there is a decoherence between the spectrum of grammars of existence: embodiment, anthropomorphism, spirituality, mythology, philosophy, empiricism, science, and operationalism (I do operationalism in this attempt at unification). Yet we need the entire spectrum of subjective to objective to address the spectrum of human experience, such that we can produce mindfulness as both child and aged, female and male, simple and wise, with the same consistent logic under increasing scales of precision demanding increasing knowledge that humans can only slowly accumulate with the wetware we call a brain.
Your fundamental insight, or at least suggestion of insight when you say: “what’s the point of [any] f*cking book if you don’t say any of the contextual details of the situation” is in the failure of drawing the relationship between the very simple laws of the universe (operationalism), their expression in a given context (point in space time conditions and human experience) creating commensurability, and the grammar of precision necessary to provide understanding to the populatoin needed help in adapting to (understanding), changing behavior (acting), and organizing (scaling) in response to the causal density (problem) of the moment.
Sounds like math, sort of, because it is math effectively: an equation. The universe cannot calculate because it cannot predict, but it can compute by trial and error and record it’s findings in physical, biological, neurological, and the metaphysical presumptions, group strategies, traditions, norms, values, habits, rituals and institutions that store that complexity as a scale version of our minds, just as our minds are a scale version of our cells-and-genes, our genes a scale version of elements, and elements a scale version of particles, and particles a scale version of the vacillations of the quantum background.
Science (truth) should terminate with operationalism just as Embodiment (experience) should terminate with neuroscience. But that only tells us what exists and how the universe behaves. It does NOT advise us what to do with that ‘kit’ of understanding. Parables tell us what is universal, history what is particular, science what is precise, and the purpose of philosophy remains in the production of a theory of the production of the good in a given context produced by a given era, and the state of man in the conditions of that era.
There is nothing preventing us from the european ambition to ascend into gods – other than failing to understand our mission is the knowledge necessary for godhood.
Affections
CD
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 17:52:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881761787525402624
RT @curtdoolittle: @calabrianvice @ovensoflove @AutistocratMS BANS ON TIKTOK, ONLYFANS, PORNHUB:
Bans on Undermining Familial, Social, Pol…
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 17:21:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881753985578881078