Smart.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 21:45:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881820539628700092
Reply addressees: @JohannNetram
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881801311580291317
Author: Curt Doolittle
-
A monument is a claim on territory, on morality, on law, on government. A monume
A monument is a claim on territory, on morality, on law, on government. A monument, a temple, a church, and certainly a mosque, are not social institutions. They are political institutions that can be put to good or ill, and to ill in achieving by socially seditious means that which can only be prevented by military means.
Wake up.
Total Integration.
Or Forcible Repatriation.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 21:43:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881819953755754497
-
WHY DO THE FRENCH HATE THE ANGLOSPHERE – AND TRUMP IN PARTICULAR? The french hav
WHY DO THE FRENCH HATE THE ANGLOSPHERE – AND TRUMP IN PARTICULAR?
The french have retained (a) pagan era venus worship (the feminine), (b) the feudal feminization of the language (c) the feminization of the catholic church (d) the authoritarianism of the feminine (d) the invention of socialism as an extension of feminine, catholic, authoritarian MATERNALISM, and so of COURSE the french favor the feminine > venus-worship > maternal > abrahamic Socialist > marxist > feminist > woke > face-before-truth objection to the steppe, ancient aristocratic, germanic, masculine, rational, empirical, truth-before-face of the anglosphere and it’s PATERNALISM in order to maximize individual responsibility and therefore liberty versus maternal minimization of individual responsibility and therefore a preference for authority.
I mean, who started this cascade of feminine destruction of the west? It was the french, industrialized and institutionalized by the jews, and adopted almost universally by the irresponsible majority of women.
Women hate men. Women hate responsibility. Women hate accountability. Women hate truth before face. And so women hate paternalism.
It stops them from seducing, parasitism, undermining, and lying to avoid responsibility and accountability.
The french are the political expression of the authoritarian feminine, just as the jews are the political expression of the seditious feminine.
It’s not complicated.
In fact, it’s deterministic.
And obvious.
It’s just offensive.
Because it’s truth before face.RE: https://t.co/S1bSKDdlxH
Reply addressees: @expatanon
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 21:40:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881819211871436800
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881812861816865086
-
That has, unfortunately, become the central question, hasn’t it?
That has, unfortunately, become the central question, hasn’t it?
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 21:30:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881816773626040358
Reply addressees: @Johnny2Fingersz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881795811450970498
-
RT @elonmusk: That’s what is really gutting them
RT @elonmusk: That’s what is really gutting them
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 21:17:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881813413975957991
-
Today: David Shapiro Confirms AI Commoditization. AI’s are a basic technology th
Today: David Shapiro Confirms AI Commoditization.
AI’s are a basic technology that is easily reproducible.
We can literally compress all human knowledge into a single model (see my work on representation).
DeepSeekR1 proves there is no moat.
AIs are a massive capital investment on the scale of the internet boom – but worse.
AIs can vary in specialization, sure. But they need to be faster, cheapter, or smarter to find market space.
You can run DeepSeek on a mac mini for goodness sake because M(x) chips come with onboard NPUs.
AI’s are going to be ubiquitous and commoditized. Every nation will have it (truly, all organizations and most people can have one – the difference is in the bias you insert into your data structures.
For example, once the printing press was invented within a decade it jumped borders, and was universal within a century. The ottomans were the only people to prohibit it (defending islamic ignorance) and they fell behind.
Cooperation and competition between AIs is mutually improving. (just like us, just like neurons…)
In other words, there will be no competitive advantage to the AI, only on the materialization of AI IDEAS into research, development, production, and trade.
Governments are gonna have a HELL OF A TIME with propaganda. And early uses of AI for spam are going to be in a race for attention vs filtering.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 20:57:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881808382165991424
-
I understand. (sigh) 😉
I understand. (sigh) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 19:51:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881791866007695416
Reply addressees: @trust_gabe
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881779950245806142
-
He just doesn’t ‘get it’ in the context of history, philosophy, law, and institu
He just doesn’t ‘get it’ in the context of history, philosophy, law, and institutional development – which is, of course, the context in which we were speaking. Ergo the meaning is a bit more profound in that context. Because it tells us how to FIX the problem.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 19:21:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881784177428996523
Reply addressees: @Wodenshot @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881782059452240032
-
RT @curtdoolittle: @CuriousKonkie @RichardArion1 EXPLANATION: “What’s going on h
RT @curtdoolittle: @CuriousKonkie @RichardArion1 EXPLANATION: “What’s going on here?”
GROK: —“Does Curt Doolittle use “testifyable testi…
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 19:18:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881783407707107475
-
EXPLANATION: “What’s going on here?” GROK: —“Does Curt Doolittle use “testifya
EXPLANATION: “What’s going on here?”
GROK: —“Does Curt Doolittle use “testifyable testimony” to mean something specific or is it a typo?”—
OK this is an awesome example of hallucination. lol.
The encoder doesn’t retain the text, it only converts it to a numerical code, and then the decoder just spits out the original term.
So the AI can’t tell the difference in this case between “Testifiable” and “Testifyable” because roughly speaking, numerically it’s encoded as two numbers for “Testify” and “able”.
Secondly, it’s because I DO redefine or modify terms to remove ambiguity so that terms can be used as measurements. So it’s ‘Assumption’ (hallucination) is rationally explicable in the context of my work.
It’s just wrong. lol
And yeah, it’s a typo. And at this point in my life my reputation for typos will never die even if I could find a spell checker that didn’t cause hanging from memory leakage. 😉
Thanks for the chuckle. 😉
Reply addressees: @CuriousKonkie @RichardArion1
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 19:18:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881783363792752640
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881780702859120996