And on top of that: hugs. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 19:07:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881780768068063507
Reply addressees: @trust_gabe
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881780030004748738
Author: Curt Doolittle
-
You are. Right now. The more of us there are. The more influential we become. Th
You are. Right now. The more of us there are. The more influential we become. The problem is, unlike leftist gossip rallying and undermining, it’s actually kind of HARD to do what we do. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 19:07:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881780688715911434
Reply addressees: @trust_gabe
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881780030004748738
-
The only implication I’m making is that without the incentives of the government
The only implication I’m making is that without the incentives of the government the other incentives wouldn’t matter, so I suggest you are falling into conspiracy because it suits a secondary (even if meritorious) agenda, instead of the one in question.
You are engaging in conflation and obscurantism instead of disambiguation and explanation. It’s probably subconscious but it’s also dishonest or at least untruthful.
And if I can get you to understand, accept, and habituate that behavior, then I can help you improve your ability and persuasion for decades to come (which is why I do this kind of thing).Reply addressees: @calabrianvice @ovensoflove @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 19:06:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881780314525356032
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881778274818539872
-
“…my age cohort are the first demographic of elite aspirant white men in centu
–“…my age cohort are the first demographic of elite aspirant white men in centuries that the system didn’t bribe with comfort”– Rudyard Lynch (@whatifalthist)
This is the insight, the frame, and the answer. This how to reduce the problem of apparent. complexity to it’s first…
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 19:02:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881779363869577351
-
Q: —“is there ever escaping this cycle?”– Ah. I see. Thank you. 😉 Yes we can
Q: —“is there ever escaping this cycle?”–
Ah. I see. Thank you. 😉Yes we can escape the cycle, (which is covered in my presentations this fall and in book 1 of the series we’re getting close to completing.)
Laws and institutions do not always keep up with inventions in criminality, because our systems of identifying and measuring novel criminalities as they evolve from obvious to obscured, is a technology that must evolve in concert.
Hence why I work on such a thing with such determination. 😉
Reply addressees: @trust_gabe
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 19:00:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881778817381081088
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881777553586917787
-
Just posted a clarification. Not that you’re wrong, but that ‘scientific’ is pro
Just posted a clarification. Not that you’re wrong, but that ‘scientific’ is probably point not a direction.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 18:50:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881776473402748993
Reply addressees: @RichardArion1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881775471530291528
-
WHAT DOES SCIENTIFIC MEAN? 😉 Given that we failed to define science and the sci
WHAT DOES SCIENTIFIC MEAN? 😉
Given that we failed to define science and the scientific method in the 20th century, and my work that it’s the production of testimony which is why it evolved out of the greek political system (courts), is only over the past 15 years, I think you’d need to rephrase any assertion of when natural philosophy evolved into empiricism and then into science.
In general we separate rational, from logical, from empirical, from scientific, from operational.
In my understanding that’s the evolution of epistemology necessary for the production of increases in precision of testifiable testimonyReply addressees: @RichardArion1
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 18:50:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881776338216124416
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881774820544880955
-
Also yes, I do use it largely to help me understand how others might interpret w
Also yes, I do use it largely to help me understand how others might interpret what I’ve written in my usual ‘density’.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 18:46:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881775453100544090
Reply addressees: @BlameMaxSand
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881771928916214043
-
RT @curtdoolittle: @calabrianvice @ovensoflove @AutistocratMS The way to be cert
RT @curtdoolittle: @calabrianvice @ovensoflove @AutistocratMS The way to be certain you are not thinking conspiratorially is to enumerate A…
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 18:45:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881775238872179022
-
The way to be certain you are not thinking conspiratorially is to enumerate ALL
The way to be certain you are not thinking conspiratorially is to enumerate ALL the reasons. The fact that the ADL is against something that propagates antisemitism isn’t meaningful because they rail against everyone because antisemitism is reemerging as postwar guilt ages out of the population and the internet overcomes informational suppression.
Tthe fact that other companies YT, X, Meta et al compete is nothing to the government. All tech competitors sue each other. The market eventualy wins.
The issue here is you’re not addressing the causal problem wichis is the CCP’s access to information, the CCP’s capacity to weaponize the platform by suggestion , especially when its primary audience consists of the most suggestible people. It’s not like TikTok is a bastion of intellectual fortitude. It’s for young girls as much as YT is for men.
Reply addressees: @calabrianvice @ovensoflove @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 18:45:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881775217921699840
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881772971435680247