http://www.nationalreview.com/node/388336/printWHERE THE MIDDLE CLASS GOES TO DIE
Urban policy.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 15:17:00 UTC
http://www.nationalreview.com/node/388336/printWHERE THE MIDDLE CLASS GOES TO DIE
Urban policy.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 15:17:00 UTC
http://www.city-journal.org/2014/24_3_nyc-private-wealth.htmlWhat the Rich Give to New York by Nicole Gelinas, City Journal Summer 2014
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 15:15:00 UTC
–“UNAPOLOGETIC LIVING”–
Masculinity for the 21st century.
No more apologies.
For anything.
It was messy dragging the world out of ignorance and poverty.
Yeah, we could have done a better job at it for sure.
But the fact is, that from Burke forward, we did it.
So I don’t apologize.
Sorry.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 10:51:00 UTC
(Dropped my iphone 6 again today – albeit within a nice safe case. I bought a new case that’s easier to hold onto. But net is, that it’s too big to operate with one hand while maintaining a grip, unless you get a much bigger case to give it weight and volume. I am constantly nervous about. And it sure seems like the SONY, LG, Samsung and Nokia phones are at least as good if not better than the apple phones. The only thing I really appreciate is how easily my apple products work together. So at this point I don’t know what to do. Sure seems like a 5S is the best companion for apple products. I do notice that I need my laptop a lot less with the 6, because I can do so much more on the 6 screen than the 4S.)
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 10:50:00 UTC
ROTHBARDIANS AS FEMINIST CONSPIRATORS – THE PHILOSOPHY OF BETAS.
It’s true that rothbardians have constructed an elaborate system of justification, and a set of arguments to advance that justification. It is only that your argument requires belief and normative adoption. It’s a cult. And that cult has failed. Because only socially dysfunctional people are capable of holding that belief. And only with such an elaborately justified edifice to maintain that belief.
Instead I am suggesting a social science that fully explains all political systems as evolutionary and competitive strategies, and that all belief is justification, while this particular science is an explanation.
I choose aristocratic egalitarianism because I do not have to be socially dysfunctional, adopt a belief, suspend disbelief, or engage in justification. I must only observe and acknowledge man as he demonstrates himself, and understand which institutions are necessary to provide the incentives to produce Liberty – while suppressing all free riding, and therefore both demand for the State and ability to construct a state.
You in the other hand require the fantasy – the fallacy – that ghetto ethics constitute a rational choice. They don’t. Which is why people won’t adopt them.
No one wants jews and gypsies. We murdered Jews and gypsies. We are getting close to the same with Muslims. We didn’t try to imitate them. That would be to devolve our civilization. We conquered, ostracized, oppressed and killed them. Justifiably. Necessarily. Usefully. Even if immorally. What is remarkable is that unlike all other civilisations we are tolerant enough not to exterminate them. The reason we are tolerant is that we obtain status signals from maintaining their inferiority.
No one wants low trust people’s. All lower trust people’s that one can possibly defend against, must be conquered, converted, oppressed, or killed. If not, in ghettos, whether real or virtual, we can keep low trust people as useful pets, and cheap status signals that remind us our our higher station, our superior civilization, and our superior ethics, morality, and institutions.
Unfortunately, women have entered the political domain under open enfranchisement, and have not had to earn their enfranchisement through demonstrating good judgement. And have, therefore, devolved our society rapidly, by undermining the means of suppressing unethical, immoral, and conspiratorial behavior, because women practice, unethical, immoral, and conspiratorial behavior in order to advance themselves and their offspring regardless of their merit.
(wow. I think that’s about as offensively direct as I currently know how to construct the argument. lol )
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 09:52:00 UTC
THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE NORTH SEA AND THE LEVANT.
Action vs verbalism
Operations vs meaning
Testimony vs Platonism
Recipe vs allegory
Promise vs convenience
Warranty vs irresponsibility
Innovation vs criticism
Landholding vs migrants
Commons vs parasitism
Honest Debate vs loaded gossip
Warriors vs priests
Liberty vs authority
Public truth vs private pragmatism.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 05:02:00 UTC
http://www.businessinsider.com/best-jobs-for-every-personality-2014-9Yes
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 03:31:00 UTC
http://carcinisation.com/2014/10/02/socially-enforced-thought-boundaries/—“Everything deemed politically incorrect, hatespeech or other names for communicating fact touches the Core beliefs of the Cathedral.”—
Johannes Meixner
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-06 03:07:00 UTC
Jul 01, 1975Mustang. 1967. Blue.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-05 17:19:00 UTC
Jan 01, 2013
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-05 17:17:00 UTC