Author: Curt Doolittle

PAINFUL REALIZATION: THE FAMILY AND PROPERTY RIGHTS

I’ve been wrestling with this problem for a few days now. That is, that :

(a) While intuited morality corresponds to the atomicity of the family structure;

(b) AND therefore determines demand for the state (authority to resolve conflict, prevent conflict, or prevent retaliation);

(c) AND only the absolute nuclear family can EVOLVE individual property rights, and liberty,

(d) AND the absolute nuclear family, as normative and legal, is fragile, and subject to conquest by more familial, tribal, national, and religious organizations;

(e) AND absolute nuclear families facilitate easier movement of human resources to capital (rather than moving capital to resources);

That does not mean that:

(f) An aristocratic, familial and tribal society cannot adopt legal individual property rights, and institute formally in law, and therefore in norm, total suppression of criminal, unethical, immoral, and conspiratorial actions.

(g) And therefore eliminate the need for absolute nuclear and nuclear families, thereby returning to aristocratic families.

(h) Furthermore, that only it is only by violation of rights by the formal institution of immoral and conspiratorial actions, that aristocratic families (natural aristocracy over 3+ generations) are exterminated by competitors.

Therefore,

(i) It is possible to possess both aristocratic families, outlaw persecution of aristocratic families, (inheritance taxes, etc, income taxes for the purpose of redistribution), and individual high trust property rights.

(j) In fact, since violation of the family is a violation of moral and conspiratorial property rights, then of necessity, one cannot suppress the aristocratic families and yet preserve property rights.

THEREFORE

(k) The enlightenment era, particularly the cosmopolitan enlightenment (socialism, libertinism, and neo-conservatism) is a war on the exceptional families by the unexceptional families.