Great Term Of The Day: “Positive Here-say” – Juan Sebastian Ortiz
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-08 13:45:00 UTC
Great Term Of The Day: “Positive Here-say” – Juan Sebastian Ortiz
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-08 13:45:00 UTC
SELF DECEPTION: THE ELEPHANT, THE RIDER, THE DEMON, AND THE MACHINE
The “Rider” may not be able to engage in self deception, but the “Elephant” can absolutely deceive the “Rider”.
The Rider: Reason (System 2) (the calculative system)
The Elephant: Intuition (System 1) (The “Search” system)
The Demon : The Cooperative Instinct (System 0) (Biases Property to Reproductive strategy)
The Machine : The “Property” Instinct : (System Null) (Acquisitiveness)
I knew it was possible to engage in self-deception, but I wasn’t able to articulate it before. Since ‘self’ consists of three entities, and the ‘self’ we are cognizant of is only one of three agents, the elephant can train the rider. Easily it turns out.
The Demon is not aware of itself, it merely responds to commands. The Rider is cognizant of the elephant, but the Elephant chooses between the rider and the Demon, and never tells the rider of the Demon.
HUMANS ENGAGE IN SELF DECEPTION. THE SINGULAR SELF IS A FALLACY. THE ARGUMENT AGAINST SELF DECEPTION DEPENDS UPON THIS FALLACY.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-08 13:19:00 UTC
Moral, Ratio-Empirical Libertarians. Must tolerate the truth.
Immoral, Rationalist Libertines. Must engage in deception.
Immoral dysgenic progressives. Must justify their immoral dysgenia.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-08 12:34:00 UTC
CURIOUS: CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS
As a CEO my style is very American: meaning libertarian in management: I try to create as much of a bottom-up organization as possible with as little management as possible, and to attract the best talent possible, because the best talent wants to demonstrate creative expression – in a country where creative expression is a competitive value.
The general thinking in the states is that employees know customers the best and so we need to empower them to serve customers. We get profits from helping them serve customers. The more we help them the more profits we make. The increase in credit capacity and the petro dollar has not been good for us in this respect, because it has given consumers a lot of free money to inflate the economy while reducing our discipline. In Europe consumers are much ‘poorer’ by every possible measure and so companies must fight for their attention. Conversely, people are much more patient with companies and regulations and rules than americans would be. So the culture tolerates the business climate and visa versa.
But where this shows up is lack of rotation in Europe, and less radical innovation, while we get better engineering out of germans (again, who I think ‘do it right’) in education at least – if not in an oppressiveness that is beyond my comfort. And without the humor that my anglo peers survive on. 🙂
I wonder how Oversing will play in european countries? Will europeans be able to handle(tolerate) that much transparency? That much honesty? That much measurement? That much social rather than hierarchical feedback? That much customer service? Or will just young competitors make use of such a product? Or will more hierarchical companies turn off the transparency and use it as command and control? Young people get it. Technology people worldwide seem to get it. Ukrainian’s get it. Russians get it. South American’s get it.
Hmmm…. What else….
In the states we try to push independent thinking farther down the chain than is possible. And we don’t train the bottom to be capable. We pretend everyone can become a member of the middle (or upper middle) class and fail the majority by doing so. (we have the world’s most absurd education system in that regard. for the upper half it’s awesome. but for the lower half its a tragedy.)
Germany does it about right. They focus on making the lower half excellent and so the upper half has better assets to work with that way. And it shows. Maybe Finland does it better. But they have a more homogenous society to work with so they can create a better universal educational system. But Finn’s are too timid in business. Germans are the most honest after americans. I notice that it’s actually easier to deal with germans than other americans and I have to stop myself from couching everything inoffensively when talking.
I don’t really understand the UK system. And I have had very bad experiences there. So maybe I’m biased. People turn out more literate. The middle turns out pretty well and the top excellent. But the bottom is… not as bad as the states in incompetence, but worse than the states in rent seeking behavior. Our bottom end can’t find work but they don’t try to avoid it. I don’t understand the class in the UK that seeks to avoid labor at all costs, and do the minimum whenever possible. It could be that class exists all over Europe but I only have access to it in the UK and Canada. And it’s really visible to me in both the UK and Canada.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-08 11:53:00 UTC
OMG I FORGOT TO DOWNLOAD AND EDIT THE NEW VIDEO!!!!
Guess I have work to do tonight.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-08 11:24:00 UTC
TOMORROW IN L’VIV! LVOV, LEMBERG, PARADISE
Where it’s like having a PFS meeting every day of the week!!! WHOOT!
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-08 11:24:00 UTC
Moral, Ratio-Empirical Libertarians. Must tolerate the truth.
Immoral, Rationalist Libertines. Must engage in deception.
Immoral dysgenic progressives. Must justify their immoral dysgenia.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-08 11:20:00 UTC
WHY ARE CLASSICAL LIBERALS (LIBERTARIANS) CONCERNED WITH “RIGHTS”? ANSWER: RULE OF LAW.
Our only known method of eliminating authority, is to create rules of behavior under rule of law, where (a) all rights are expressed as property rights, (b) all obligations and prohibitions apply to all, without exception, (c) all rights evolve from property rights by judicial application of the principles of property rights: (i)requirement for production/ prohibition on parasitism / non-conflict, via (ii) homesteading/first-use/abandonment and voluntary-exchange/construction, under (iii) the presumption of reasonable knowledge, and reasonable actor (Propertarianism:sympathetic testing), (iv) truthful testimony, (v) judged by peers – to new circumstances. Propertarianism requires also, (vi) such judgements be expressed as (vi.i) original intentions and (vi.ii) strict construction, and (vi.iii) in operational language.
NOTES
1) Progressives: Moral intuitions are insufficient for judgement in these matters, regressive, and dysgenic for these matters. Reason is insufficient for these matters. Our reason has ALWAYS failed us, in no small part because we are victims of cognitive bias that only disciplined application of science can moderately mitigate.
2) Conservatives: Moral traditions are insufficiently adaptive in real time for these matters. Our traditions evolved when technology was relatively static. and our traditions failed us when technology changed faster than our traditions could adapt.
3) Libertines: amorality is insufficient for the formation of a polity that does not resort to either retaliation or authority to prevent retaliation.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-08 11:18:00 UTC
THINKING OUT LOUD (Product Development)
CLOUD DRIVES.
We’ve been discussing external file systems, because some people integrate with Google docs, or Sharepoint. And I’ve considered (my favorite) integrating with Dropbox. But honestly, while it originally made sense, i can’t see the point in it.
I mean, lets say that Facebook allowed file sharing. They can’t because it would turn into a pirate bay. But Oversing is not very different from FB except it’s for business instead of social activity, and it costs money, rather than advertising, and so liability remains with the content originator, and anonymity isn’t possible like it is in social media. Just the opposite. So, if you upload a file of any kind to Oversing, it’s within that business-social network, and you have to be in the network to use it. We do that on purpose. Furthermore, Dropbox is in the amazon cloud and so is oversing. I mean, the only reason we can think of is to separate file system costs. But that’s meter-able anyway.
So the only reason I get to, I guess, is for really large files we will have a problem with our technology, because we would have to provide a background upload manager of some sort.
I can see adding external links, but we do that anyway. I mean, if you’re doing large media gigs, it’s much easier to just mirror your local drive in Dropbox or share on Google Drive and then send links to customers.
So do we implement a max file size and then ask customers to link external files for over that size? That seems like the best option to me.
But I would love advice.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-08 10:26:00 UTC
PROGRESSIVES VS CONSERVATIVES – IRRESPONSIBILITY VS INCOMPETENCE.
(I love how the socialists, progressives and the postmoderns have argued and transformed the language in favor of hedonism, and for irresponsibility for externalities; while conservatives argue for asceticism, stoicism and a prohibition on externalities, without having any idea that’s what they’re doing or why other than their moral intuitions.
Everyone is talking past each other. Progressives are morally blind, and conservatives are rhetorically incompetent. Libertines are morally as bad or worse, and as morally blind as progressives.
It’s no wonder we can’t resolve conflicts. )
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-08 10:00:00 UTC