Author: Curt Doolittle

  • Inequality is a Good

    [I]nequality is a good. In evolves man. Invention is a good. In increases our ability to consume. If we were all equal, we would have nothing to trade. And we would be poor. As are extant people who are in practice equal. To create an economy to sustain man we must create equality constantly. To create humans that evolve man, we must create equality constantly. Equality = stasis = extinction.  

  • Inequality is a Good

    [I]nequality is a good. In evolves man. Invention is a good. In increases our ability to consume. If we were all equal, we would have nothing to trade. And we would be poor. As are extant people who are in practice equal. To create an economy to sustain man we must create equality constantly. To create humans that evolve man, we must create equality constantly. Equality = stasis = extinction.  

  • Definition of Class: Reproductive Value

    (profound) (complete decidability) (objective morality)  [S]ocial class refers a rough division of humans into a distribution by their reproductive value. There is a competition between the classes, as there is a competition between all living organisms – and there must be for evolution continue and the species to persist. The competition between the classes is dysgenic at the bottom and eugenic at the top. In other words, classes are the result of evolution in action. And the question of whether an action is eugenic or dysgenic provides us with complete moral decidability in the broadest possible ethical and moral questions facing mankind. There are no moral dilemmas.  There are no morally undecidable questions. It’s just anti-monotheistic, anti-democratic, anti-dysgenic to say so.

    But then, I don’t get to say nice things. My job is true things. Or isn’t that the function of philosophy?
  • Definition of Class: Reproductive Value

    (profound) (complete decidability) (objective morality)  [S]ocial class refers a rough division of humans into a distribution by their reproductive value. There is a competition between the classes, as there is a competition between all living organisms – and there must be for evolution continue and the species to persist. The competition between the classes is dysgenic at the bottom and eugenic at the top. In other words, classes are the result of evolution in action. And the question of whether an action is eugenic or dysgenic provides us with complete moral decidability in the broadest possible ethical and moral questions facing mankind. There are no moral dilemmas.  There are no morally undecidable questions. It’s just anti-monotheistic, anti-democratic, anti-dysgenic to say so.

    But then, I don’t get to say nice things. My job is true things. Or isn’t that the function of philosophy?
  • THE FIRST PRINCIPLES OF PROPERTARIANISM 1 – Man must acquire resources. 2 – Man

    THE FIRST PRINCIPLES OF PROPERTARIANISM

    1 – Man must acquire resources.

    2 – Man must act to acquire resources.

    3 – Man must act cooperatively to disproportionately improve acquisition of resources.

    4 – Man must act to preserve and extend cooperation to preserve the disproportionate rewards of acquisition through cooperation.

    5 – Man acts to preserve and extend cooperation by the suppression of parasitism that creates the disincentive to cooperate, and therefore decreases the disproportionate rewards of acquisition through cooperation.

    6 – Man conducts parasitism by violence, theft, fraud, fraud by obscurantism, from by moralizing, fraud by omission, externality, free riding, privatization of commons, socialization of losses, conspiracy, conversion, immigration, conquest, war and genocide.

    7 – Man suppresses parasitism by threats of interpersonal violence, promises of interpersonal violence, interpersonal violence, organized ostracization in norms and commerce, when must by remuneration, and when he can by organized violence in law and war.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-29 06:43:00 UTC

  • WE HAVE FAILED TO CREATE A MARKET FOR COMMONS (from elsewhere) (division of perc

    WE HAVE FAILED TO CREATE A MARKET FOR COMMONS

    (from elsewhere) (division of perception)

    I usually argue that our moral biases reflect our reproductive strategies. And that together, we form an intertemporal division of reproductive perception, cognition, knowledge, negotiation, and labor. And by exchanges of cooperation we exchange information, just as by exchanging goods and services we exchange information, just as by the result of our exchanges for goods and services we create prices which inform us to one another’s demands.

    While we have succeeded in creating a market for goods and services, we have failed to create a market for commons. As such we have constructed no equivalent of the pricing system to tell us what is in fact in demand.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-29 05:51:00 UTC

  • POPPER IS NO REPLACEMENT FOR GOD – HE FAILED TOO (from elsewhere) (good piece) B

    POPPER IS NO REPLACEMENT FOR GOD – HE FAILED TOO

    (from elsewhere) (good piece)

    Bruce. (All)

    You’re a good guy. A moral man. But you do realize that Popper failed to complete his program – even the falsificationary program – and most of what he says is pseudoscience with moral loading?

    If you cannot describe something as a series of actions, then you are engaging in pseudoscientific double speak – an error of aggregation not dissimilar from the averaging of averages. Popper’s double-speak is not as artful or complete as Marx’s pseudoscientific double speak (dialectic), but it is equally untruthful: claiming parsimony that it does not contain.

    We may indeed face a kaleidic future but that’s immaterial. We divide our perception, cognition, knowledge and labor, and constantly try to outwit the course of events in a deterministic non-sentient universe, for our benefits: consumption. That future needn’t be known by anyone, and cannot be. It is not the individual perception of the future that matters, but the collective outwitting of the course of events, so that we can seize the difference and call it ‘production’.

    It’s true that justificationism is dead. But Critical Rationalism was incomplete. Critical Preference is a logical, not empirical statement. In fact, it appears at least, that we can choose which avenue to pursue by that which requires the lowest cost. This is identical to the means nature uses. So the least cost route appears to be the most efficient route we can ever know. So it appears that critical preference is a moral argument – a bit of advice – rather than logical or empirical argument.

    I am fairly certain at this point that you are somehow desperately trying to find a source of supernatural wisdom to replace the supernatural wisdom of scripture. But it’s not to be found in Popper. Popper and his entire generation of thinkers failed to solve the problem of the social sciences. All of them. Because they were logically attached to enlightenment egalitarian, equalitarian, universalism: an advocacy of monopoly if there ever was one.

    We can never stop problem-solving. Never cease innovation. Never cease competition. We can never ‘relax’ and fall upon past wisdom. Because submission is not available to man. We are the only gods we know of in this universe. Those we imagine are merely those we aspire to be. And by that aspiration we achieve.

    If there is any devil, any fallen god, any fallen angel, it is the one who whispers that there is but one god. If there is one evil scripture it is equality. If but one sin it is submission. We divide our perception, cognition, knowledge, advocacy and labor, and by exchange we collectively compute that which is necessary to persist.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-29 05:49:00 UTC

  • THE CHURCH WAS AN AMPLIFIER NOT A CREATOR The Church federalized the Aristocracy

    THE CHURCH WAS AN AMPLIFIER NOT A CREATOR

    The Church federalized the Aristocracy into The Christian Monarchies. And the church amplified our hunter-gatherer lack of aggression. But that is very different from saying that the church created western civilization. The church was an amplifier, not a creator. The church did good, but it has done both damage and good. And the enlightenment failed to overcome the damage. Our generation’s objective is to overcome the failure of the enlightenment, and overcome the damage of the church, and overcome the damage of the state that cast itself as a replacement for the church.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-29 04:03:00 UTC

  • RT @RealJamesWoods: The Left will tolerate no dissent. Convert or be destroyed (

    RT @RealJamesWoods: The Left will tolerate no dissent. Convert or be destroyed (shunned, humiliated, forcefully unemployed, etc.) http://t.…


    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-29 04:02:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/615369645944664064

  • AMAZON Amazon has this wonderful cloud system. Far better than Google’s or Micro

    AMAZON

    Amazon has this wonderful cloud system. Far better than Google’s or Microsoft’s. And it’s generating profits for them. But it’s a disincentive. After a while, it’s more profitable to borrow the money to build your own, then to use their service.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-29 03:15:00 UTC