Curt Doolittle

Author: Curt Doolittle

  • 2015-06-29

    2015-06-29

    http://www.propertarianism.com http://t.co/G1VSaAvbks

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-29 14:15:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/615523923510329344

  • The Church Amplified Western Civilization. It Did Not Create It.

    [T]he Church federalized the Aristocracy into The Christian Monarchies. And the Church amplified our hunter-gatherer lack of aggression. But that is very different from saying that the Church created western civilization. The Church was an amplifier, not a creator. The Church did good – but it has done both damage and good. And the enlightenment failed to overcome that damage. Our generation’s objective is to overcome the failure of the enlightenment, and overcome the damage of the church, and overcome the damage of the state that cast itself as a replacement for the church. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine Source: Curt Doolittle – THE CHURCH WAS AN AMPLIFIER NOT A CREATOR The…

  • The Church Amplified Western Civilization. It Did Not Create It.

    [T]he Church federalized the Aristocracy into The Christian Monarchies. And the Church amplified our hunter-gatherer lack of aggression. But that is very different from saying that the Church created western civilization. The Church was an amplifier, not a creator. The Church did good – but it has done both damage and good. And the enlightenment failed to overcome that damage. Our generation’s objective is to overcome the failure of the enlightenment, and overcome the damage of the church, and overcome the damage of the state that cast itself as a replacement for the church. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine Source: Curt Doolittle – THE CHURCH WAS AN AMPLIFIER NOT A CREATOR The…

  • Aspie-Twit Seb Ortiz is off his meds again and calling me a Nazi apparently. I s

    Aspie-Twit Seb Ortiz is off his meds again and calling me a Nazi apparently. I suppose the fact that he basically lied then stole $2,000 from me when I was being charitable friend to a man in desperate need. But then, you know, it’s just more evidence that he has no argument to stand on. And he’s evidence of the magnetism that rothbardianism has for social rejects. Now Seb. Be a nice little aspie and take your meds. Lay in the sun. And enjoy life a bit.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-29 10:43:00 UTC

  • @FFloodgates (Hey, on the FF home page, do you pull any image from the post? How

    @FFloodgates (Hey, on the FF home page, do you pull any image from the post? How do I ensure an image appears, instead of a blank square?)

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-29 09:07:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/615446599314067456

  • Aristocratic Egalitarianism

    [T]o say that European Aristocracy is Egalitarian is somewhat of a tautology.  An aristocracy requires numbers, and has an interest in creating large numbers in a hierarchy of aristocratic peers.  So aristocracy is egalitarian – open to meritocratic entry.

  • Aristocratic Egalitarianism

    [T]o say that European Aristocracy is Egalitarian is somewhat of a tautology.  An aristocracy requires numbers, and has an interest in creating large numbers in a hierarchy of aristocratic peers.  So aristocracy is egalitarian – open to meritocratic entry.

  • Sorry: Propertarianism is an Amoral and Objective Language – And That Can Be Emotionally Unsatisfying.

    [I] know that you want to feel emotionally vindicated, and that you want to vent your frustrations when conducting an argument, but the fact of the matter is Propertarianism and Testimonialism are constructed amorally (( amoral adjective “not involving questions of right or wrong; without moral quality; neither moral nor immoral.” )) so that all moral propositions can be objectively described, and all moral questions are objectively decidable. Propertarianism(ethics) and Testimonialism (epistemology) let you construct and win arguments wherein the other party is using various means of deception in order to obscure their advocacy for thefts. So, assuming you’re right (and conservatives are usually right, even if argumentatively incompetent) then using Testimonialism and Propertarianism will allow you to win arguments. But unlike simple (cheap) quips, they are expensive arguments to construct and require that you have a bit of skill. And if that isn’t enough. Well. You don’t have reason to feel good, or to win.  We leave that to the liars and theives.

  • Sorry: Propertarianism is an Amoral and Objective Language – And That Can Be Emotionally Unsatisfying.

    [I] know that you want to feel emotionally vindicated, and that you want to vent your frustrations when conducting an argument, but the fact of the matter is Propertarianism and Testimonialism are constructed amorally (( amoral adjective “not involving questions of right or wrong; without moral quality; neither moral nor immoral.” )) so that all moral propositions can be objectively described, and all moral questions are objectively decidable. Propertarianism(ethics) and Testimonialism (epistemology) let you construct and win arguments wherein the other party is using various means of deception in order to obscure their advocacy for thefts. So, assuming you’re right (and conservatives are usually right, even if argumentatively incompetent) then using Testimonialism and Propertarianism will allow you to win arguments. But unlike simple (cheap) quips, they are expensive arguments to construct and require that you have a bit of skill. And if that isn’t enough. Well. You don’t have reason to feel good, or to win.  We leave that to the liars and theives.

  • Revising Woods: The Catholic Church was also a product of western civ. Not its c

    Revising Woods: The Catholic Church was also a product of western civ. Not its creator. Influence.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-29 07:22:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/615420164692144129

    Reply addressees: @ReactionaryTree @JamesBluejay @NRxGroup

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/615418589286395904

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/615418589286395904