OPINION:(legal scholar) As I understand it there is no precedent for the State i

OPINION:(legal scholar) As I understand it there is no precedent for the State interfering in the marriage contract, where the marriage contract consists of public insurance of non-interference in a family, thereby preventing moral hazard of children w/ single parent and poverty.


Source date (UTC): 2022-06-24 18:31:34 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1540402268905807872

Reply addressees: @AP

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1540395505796136962

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *