5. Going through say, Langan’s theory of CTMU everything, it’s pretty obvious what he’s trying to do, and why, and when he’s making claims by analogy rather than causality or equality. “that doesn’t follow” is painfully easy. Its sophistry and theology with tacky math dressing.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-21 14:57:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429095371079405577
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429095369854627844
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
4. I’m sympathetic to these people because I can’t do my work in the academy for political reasons and because it’s not possible to assemble a dissertation committee on my topic.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1429095369854627844
Leave a Reply