The presumption of ignorance and error is a polite manifestation of western ethics of discourse, but it is not however evidenced in history. We err far less than we deceive, and the vast majority of thought is but elaborate deception to perpetuate one fraud, another, or many.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 20:47:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184571621970980868
Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184571257846747137
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MattPirkowski Hmm… I had to work on the eradication of deceit, and came to the opposite conclusion: that conceptual development is discernibly either reciprocal or irreciprocal(fraud), and thus the judgement is possible and necessary: one dark age of ignorance and deceit is enough.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184571257846747137
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@MattPirkowski Hmm… I had to work on the eradication of deceit, and came to the opposite conclusion: that conceptual development is discernibly either reciprocal or irreciprocal(fraud), and thus the judgement is possible and necessary: one dark age of ignorance and deceit is enough.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184571257846747137
Leave a Reply