So sorry if I seem pedantic but just wanted to work through this nit because it’s a common equivalency I want to be able to answer cogently. – Thanks. ( And yeah, there is something very wrong with physics. 😉 )
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 16:12:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175080333739532288
Reply addressees: @PoseidonAwoke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175080080873349122
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@PoseidonAwoke And so, I assume what you’re pointing out is that bias and deceit is available in each of these grammars – and the knowledge of the difference between collective consistency and correspondence and coherence, and an act of deceit, depends on deltas of knowledge in and across each.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175080080873349122
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@PoseidonAwoke And so, I assume what you’re pointing out is that bias and deceit is available in each of these grammars – and the knowledge of the difference between collective consistency and correspondence and coherence, and an act of deceit, depends on deltas of knowledge in and across each.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175080080873349122
Leave a Reply