My accusation is that each of your points “quotes” is a sophistry (lie) to cover the lies and intended thefts that your arguments seek to support. I deflated one of them, and I can (if I wish) deflate the entirety of them, showing the same attempted fraud in each case.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 23:33:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055603165691817985
Reply addressees: @PhilosophyCuck @MrKennan1948 @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055558405501452289
IN REPLY TO:
@Jonas_Ceika
@curtdoolittle @MrKennan1948 @WorMartiN The main confusion seems to be that you think I’m only talking about intent, I’m not. I’m literally showing how Hicks is misinterpreting the relevant theory and backing it up with sources. Again, you’re not addressing my points. You’re also not making arguments for your case.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055558405501452289
Leave a Reply