I am not confused. I’m waiting for you to put together an argument. And since you haven’t, I’m framing the argument as we do (hicks and I), as marxists and postmodernists seeking to construct a fiction using sophistry and pseudoscience to replace the sophistry of religion.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 23:31:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055602738476785664
Reply addressees: @PhilosophyCuck @MrKennan1948 @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055558405501452289
IN REPLY TO:
@Jonas_Ceika
@curtdoolittle @MrKennan1948 @WorMartiN The main confusion seems to be that you think I’m only talking about intent, I’m not. I’m literally showing how Hicks is misinterpreting the relevant theory and backing it up with sources. Again, you’re not addressing my points. You’re also not making arguments for your case.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055558405501452289
Leave a Reply