6) And that under Pilpul(Justificationism) and Critique (Straw Manning, disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossiping, rallying) any internal consistency (constant relations) can be argued (story or fraud constructed) to violate correspondence, reciprocity, limits, and completeness.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 13:15:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055447879790313473
Reply addressees: @PhilosophyCuck @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055224404764999680
IN REPLY TO:
@Jonas_Ceika
@curtdoolittle @WorMartiN You also end by saying one should study law, not literature. First off, I don’t study literature. Secondly, how is that an argument? And how is if Marx is liable for murder at all relevant to my points? I’m genuinely confused.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055224404764999680
Leave a Reply